| Literature DB >> 35965830 |
Yongchun Zhou1,2, Xin Liu1,2, Yinjin Guo1,2, Zhuoying Li1,2, Shunhui Zhu3, Quan Li1,2, Xiaoxiong Wang1,2, Ruijiao Yang1,2, Zhenghai Shen1,2, Hongsheng Li1,2, Yaxi Du1,2, Luyao Ma1,2, Shaocong Shen1,2, Yunyi Lan1,2, Yunchao Huang4.
Abstract
Background: In China, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of lung cancer-associated genetic mutations focused on ethnic minorities in the southwestern region. Our study aimed to provide valuable information on lung cancer-associated genetic alterations for cancer diagnosis and treatment, especially in ethnic minorities.Entities:
Keywords: EGFR; Multi-ethnic patients; Yunnan; lung cancer; propensity score matching (PSM)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35965830 PMCID: PMC9372700 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Characteristics of lung cancer patients from ethnic groups in southwestern China after PSM
| Characteristics | Han (n=1,492) | Yi (n=175) | Bai (n=100) | Hui (n=50) | Hani (n=48) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, n [%] | 0.898 | |||||
| Female | 628 [42] | 73 [42] | 45 [45] | 23 [46] | 18 [38] | |
| Male | 864 [58] | 102 [58] | 55 [55] | 27 [54] | 30 [62] | |
| Age (years) | 0.7 | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 57.2±10.4 | 56.7±10.3 | 57.9±11.0 | 55.4±9.75 | 57.0±11.6 | |
| Median (min, max) | 57.0 (17.0, 92.0) | 56.0 (26.0, 81.0) | 59.5 (28.0, 80.0) | 54.0 (28.0, 82.0) | 57.5 (31.0, 82.0) | |
| Smoking, n [%] | 0.965 | |||||
| Non-smoker | 946 [63] | 112 [64] | 62 [62] | 34 [68] | 31 [65] | |
| Smoker | 546 [37] | 63 [36] | 38 [38] | 16 [32] | 17 [35] | |
| Brain metastasis, n [%] | 0.617 | |||||
| No | 1,384 [93] | 159 [91] | 90 [90] | 48 [96] | 44 [92] | |
| Yes | 108 [7] | 16 [9] | 10 [10] | 2 [4] | 4 [8] | |
| Bone metastasis, n [%] | 0.902 | |||||
| No | 1,191 [80] | 137 [78] | 82 [82] | 38 [76] | 39 [81] | |
| Yes | 301 [20] | 38 [22] | 18 [18] | 12 [24] | 9 [19] | |
| Visceral metastasis, n [%] | 0.393 | |||||
| No | 1,386 [93] | 166 [95] | 90 [90] | 44 [88] | 44 [92] | |
| Yes | 106 [7] | 9 [5] | 10 [10] | 6 [12] | 4 [8] | |
| Clinical stage, n [%] | 0.479 | |||||
| I | 306 [21] | 37 [21] | 17 [17] | 14 [28] | 8 [17] | |
| II | 47 [3] | 8 [5] | 6 [6] | 0 [0] | 1 [2] | |
| III | 225 [15] | 29 [17] | 16 [16] | 3 [6] | 6 [12] | |
| IV | 914 [61] | 101 [58] | 61 [61] | 33 [66] | 33 [69] | |
| Histology, n [%] | 0.917 | |||||
| LUAD | 1,328 [89] | 153 [87] | 86 [86] | 45 [90] | 46 [96] | |
| LUSC | 127 [9] | 15 [9] | 11 [11] | 5 [10] | 1 [2] | |
| NSCLC nos. | 17 [1] | 3 [2] | 1 [1] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | |
| ADSC | 9 [1] | 1 [1] | 1 [1] | 0 [0] | 1 [2] | |
| LCLC | 6 [0] | 2 [1] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | |
| SCLC | 5 [0] | 1 [1] | 1 [1] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | |
| Sample type, n [%] | 0.788 | |||||
| Plasma | 511 [34] | 57 [33] | 37 [37] | 16 [32] | 13 [27] | |
| Tissue | 981 [66] | 118 [67] | 63 [63] | 34 [68] | 35 [73] | |
| Xuanwei origin, n [%] | 0.437 | |||||
| No | 1,450 [97] | 168 [96] | 99 [99] | 48 [96] | 48 [100] | |
| Yes | 42 [3] | 7 [4] | 1 [1] | 2 [4] | 0 [0] | |
| Region distribution, n [%] | <0.001 | |||||
| Northeast Yunnan | 465 [31] | 26 [15] | 3 [3] | 19 [38] | 0 [0] | |
| South Yunnan | 224 [15] | 57 [33] | 4 [4] | 6 [12] | 41 [85] | |
| Northwest Yunnan | 150 [10] | 16 [9] | 75 [75] | 5 [10] | 0 [0] | |
| Central Yunnan | 492 [33] | 59 [34] | 17 [17] | 14 [28] | 7 [15] | |
| Yunnan unknown | 5 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | |
| Non-Yunnan | 156 [10] | 17 [10] | 1 [1] | 6 [12] | 0 [0] |
PSM, propensity score matching; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma; NSCLC nos., non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified; ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; LCLC, large-cell lung cancer; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer.
Figure 1Comparison of the prevalence of EGFR mutation among major ethnic groups. (A) The incidence of EGFR mutation in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups; (B) the incidence of EGFR 19 deletion in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups; (C) the incidence of EGFR 19 deletion in Han and non-Han groups; (D) the incidence of EGFR 19 deletion in Hui and others groups; (E) the point mutation frequency of EGFR L858R in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups; (F) the point mutation frequency of EGFR T790M in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups. WT, wild type; Mut, mutation.
Figure 2Comparison of the prevalence of ALK fusion and KRAS mutation among major ethnic groups. (A) The incidence of ALK fusion in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups; (B) the prevalence of ALK fusion in Hui and others groups; (C) the incidence of KRAS mutation in Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups; (D) the incidence of KRAS mutation in Hani, Han, and other ethnic groups. WT, wild type; Mut, mutation.
Figure 3Comparison of the prevalence of ROS1, RET, MET, BRAF, and ERBB2 alterations among major ethnic groups. (A-E) The prevalence of ROS1, RET, MET, BRAF, and ERBB2 alterations in the Han, Yi, Bai, Hui, and Hani groups. WT, wild type; Mut, mutation.
Figure 4Chart depicting the interrelationships between genetic mutations, smoking status (A), and gender (B) in each study ethnic group.