Helen A Powell1, Barbara Iyen-Omofoman2, Richard B Hubbard3, David R Baldwin4, Laila J Tata2. 1. Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England; Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. Electronic address: helen.powell@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. 3. Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England; Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England; Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, England. 4. Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, England.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that for the same quantity of cigarettes smoked, women are more likely to develop heart disease than men, but studies in lung cancer have produced conflicting results. We studied the association between smoking quantity and lung cancer in men and women. METHODS: Using data from The Health Improvement Network (a UK medical research database), we generated a data set comprising 12,121 incident cases of lung cancer and 48,216 age-, sex-, and general practice-matched control subjects. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate ORs for lung cancer according to highest-ever-quantity smoked in men and women separately. RESULTS: The odds of lung cancer in women who had ever smoked heavily compared with those who had never smoked were increased 19-fold (OR, 19.10; 95% CI, 16.98-21.49), which was more than for men smoking the same quantity (OR, 12.81; 95% CI, 11.52-14.24). There was strong evidence of a difference in effect of quantity smoked on lung cancer between men and women (interaction P < .0001), which remained after adjusting for height (a proxy marker for lung volume). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate and heavy smoking carry a higher risk of lung cancer in women than in men, and this difference does not seem to be explained by lung volume. The findings suggest that extrapolating risk estimates for lung cancer in men to women will underestimate the adverse impact of smoking in women.
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that for the same quantity of cigarettes smoked, women are more likely to develop heart disease than men, but studies in lung cancer have produced conflicting results. We studied the association between smoking quantity and lung cancer in men and women. METHODS: Using data from The Health Improvement Network (a UK medical research database), we generated a data set comprising 12,121 incident cases of lung cancer and 48,216 age-, sex-, and general practice-matched control subjects. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate ORs for lung cancer according to highest-ever-quantity smoked in men and women separately. RESULTS: The odds of lung cancer in women who had ever smoked heavily compared with those who had never smoked were increased 19-fold (OR, 19.10; 95% CI, 16.98-21.49), which was more than for men smoking the same quantity (OR, 12.81; 95% CI, 11.52-14.24). There was strong evidence of a difference in effect of quantity smoked on lung cancer between men and women (interaction P < .0001), which remained after adjusting for height (a proxy marker for lung volume). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate and heavy smoking carry a higher risk of lung cancer in women than in men, and this difference does not seem to be explained by lung volume. The findings suggest that extrapolating risk estimates for lung cancer in men to women will underestimate the adverse impact of smoking in women.
Authors: Young Duk Yun; Joung Hwan Back; Haryeom Ghang; Sun Ha Jee; Yeol Kim; Sun Mi Lee; Jonathan M Samet; Kang Soo Lee Journal: Lung Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: J Remon; E Molina-Montes; M Majem; P Lianes; D Isla; P Garrido; E Felip; N Viñolas; J de Castro; A Artal; M-J Sánchez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: A Papadopoulos; F Guida; K Leffondré; S Cénée; D Cyr; A Schmaus; L Radoï; S Paget-Bailly; M Carton; G Menvielle; A-S Woronoff; B Tretarre; D Luce; I Stücker Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 7.640