| Literature DB >> 35959482 |
Thuy Nguyen Dac Luong1, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen1, Al-Niaimi Firas2, Trung The Van1.
Abstract
Background: Genital warts are a common sexually transmitted disease (STD), and there is no method that completely prevents its recurrence. Recently, zinc has been used in the treatment of cutaneous warts. Nondestructive action, ease of use, and promising results with low chances of relapse were reflected in the treatment. These effects may arise from the immunomodulatory activity of zinc in the event of a viral infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35959482 PMCID: PMC9363164 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7616453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 1064-7449
The clinical characteristics of patients with genital warts.
| Clinical characteristics | Male ( | Female ( | Total ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (q1, q3, wk) | 16 (4–25) | 7.5 (4–16) | 8 (4–22) | 0.13∗ |
| Recurrence, | 27 (66%) | 14 (38%) | 41 (53%) | 0.01† |
| Number of lesions (q1, q3) | 6 (3 – 9) | 8 (4–11) | 7 (4–10) | 0.07∗ |
| Sites of lesions (%) | Glans, 61% | Vulva, 89% | ||
| Shaft, 24% | Vagina, 24% | |||
| Anal, 24% | Cervix, 35% | |||
| Meatus, 20% | Meatus, 14% | |||
| Perineum, 10% | Perineum, 5% | |||
| Number of sites, | 0.19† | |||
| 1 | 27 (66%) | 19 (51%) | 46 (59%) | |
| >1 | 14 (34%) | 18 (49%) | 32 (41%) | |
| Spread, | 0.41† | |||
| Mild | 18 (44%) | 13 (35%) | 31 (40%) | |
| Moderate | 16 (39%) | 13 (35%) | 29 (37%) | |
| Severe | 7 (17%) | 11 (30%) | 18 (23%) | |
| Number of lesions, | 0.08† | |||
| <10 | 31 (76%) | 21 (57%) | 52 (67%) | |
| ≥10 | 10 (24%) | 16 (43%) | 26 (33%) |
q1: 1st quartile; q3: 3rd quartile; wk: weeks; ∗: Mann-Whitney U test; †: chi-squared test. There was a significant difference in recurrence between male and female patients (P = 0.01, chi-squared test), but not in the number of sites affected, number of lesions, or the spread.
Figure 1Comparison of the serum zinc levels between the patient group and the control group (Student's t-test). The round dots show values of serum zinc level, and the orange square dot lines show mean values.
The association between the serum zinc level and the duration of the disease (ANOVA test).
| Disease duration ( | Serum zinc level ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients ( | Controls ( | ||
| <3 months ( | 81.01 ± 15.97 | 86.66 ± 17.58 | >0.05 |
| ≥3 months ( | 82.60 ± 11.96 | ||
| <6 months ( | 81.48 ± 14.71 | 86.66 ± 17.58 | >0.05 |
| ≥6 months ( | 82.84 ± 11.93 | ||
| <9 months ( | 81.71 ± 14.53 | 86.66 ± 17.58 | >0.05 |
| ≥9 months ( | 82.63 ± 10.03 | ||
There was no significant difference between serum zinc levels of patients with different disease durations and healthy people (P > 0.05, ANOVA test).
Figure 2The relationship between the mean serum level of zinc and the spread of genital warts (ANOVA test; Student's t-test). The round dots show values of serum zinc level, and the orange square dot lines show mean values.
Figure 3The serum level of zinc in relation to the number of sites affected (Student's t-test). The round dots show values of serum zinc level, and the orange square dot lines show mean values.
Figure 4The serum level of zinc in relation to the number of lesions (Student's t-test). The round dots show values of serum zinc level, and the orange square dot lines show mean values.