Literature DB >> 35959078

The Informative Process Model as a New Intervention for Attitude Change in Intractable Conflicts: Theory and Empirical Evidence.

Nimrod Rosler1, Keren Sharvit2, Boaz Hameiri1, Ori Wiener-Blotner2, Orly Idan3, Daniel Bar-Tal1.   

Abstract

Peacemaking is especially challenging in situations of intractable conflict. Collective narratives in this context contribute to coping with challenges societies face, but also fuel conflict continuation. We introduce the Informative Process Model (IPM), proposing that informing individuals about the socio-psychological processes through which conflict-supporting narratives develop, and suggesting that they can change via comparison to similar conflicts resolved peacefully, can facilitate unfreezing and change in attitudes. Study 1 established associations between awareness of conflict costs and conflict-supporting narratives, belief in the possibility of resolving the conflict peacefully and support for pursuing peace among Israeli-Jews and Palestinians. Studies 2 and 3 found that exposure to IPM-based original videos (vs. control) led Israeli-Jews to deliberation of the information presented, predicting acceptance of the IPM-based message, which, in turn, predicted support for negotiations. Study 3 also found similar effects across IPM-based messages focusing on different conflict-supporting themes. We discuss the implications to attitude change in intractable conflicts.
Copyright © 2022 Rosler, Sharvit, Hameiri, Wiener-Blotner, Idan and Bar-Tal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Israeli-Palestinian conflict; attitude change; intractable conflict; narratives; peace

Year:  2022        PMID: 35959078      PMCID: PMC9361850          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  23 in total

1.  Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions.

Authors:  Philip E. Tetlock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: evidence, limitations, and potential.

Authors:  Ananthi Al Ramiah; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing".

Authors:  A W Kruglanski; D M Webster
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.

Authors:  Gregory M Walton; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Paradoxical Thinking as a Conflict-Resolution Intervention: Comparison to Alternative Interventions and Examination of Psychological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Boaz Hameiri; Eden Nabet; Daniel Bar-Tal; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-10-20

Review 6.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field.

Authors:  Eran Halperin; Roni Porat; Maya Tamir; James J Gross
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-04

8.  Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention.

Authors:  Sabine Girod; Magali Fassiotto; Daisy Grewal; Manwai Candy Ku; Natarajan Sriram; Brian A Nosek; Hannah Valantine
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Two-Sided Messages Promote Openness for Morally Based Attitudes.

Authors:  Mengran Xu; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2021-02-15

10.  Current and Future Costs of Intractable Conflicts-Can They Create Attitude Change?

Authors:  Nimrod Rosler; Boaz Hameiri; Daniel Bar-Tal; Dalia Christophe; Sigal Azaria-Tamir
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.