Literature DB >> 12860191

Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions.

Philip E. Tetlock1.   

Abstract

Many people insist that their commitments to certain values (e.g. love, honor, justice) are absolute and inviolable - in effect, sacred. They treat the mere thought of trading off sacred values against secular ones (such as money) as transparently outrageous - in effect, taboo. Economists insist, however, that in a world of scarce resources, taboo trade-offs are unavoidable. Research shows that, although people do respond with moral outrage to taboo trade-offs, they often acquiesce when secular violations of sacred values are rhetorically reframed as routine or tragic trade-offs. The results reveal the peculiar character of moral boundaries on what is thinkable, alternately punitively rigid and forgivingly flexible.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12860191     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00135-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  42 in total

1.  Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict.

Authors:  Jeremy Ginges; Scott Atran; Douglas Medin; Khalil Shikaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  War as a moral imperative (not just practical politics by other means).

Authors:  Jeremy Ginges; Scott Atran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause.

Authors:  Scott Atran; Hammad Sheikh; Angel Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being.

Authors:  Tim M Daw; Sarah Coulthard; William W L Cheung; Katrina Brown; Caroline Abunge; Diego Galafassi; Garry D Peterson; Tim R McClanahan; Johnstone O Omukoto; Lydiah Munyi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing nine ritual types.

Authors:  Ronald Fischer; Rohan Callander; Paul Reddish; Joseph Bulbulia
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-06

6.  Cooperate without looking: why we care what people think and not just what they do.

Authors:  Moshe Hoffman; Erez Yoeli; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Aversion to playing God and moral condemnation of technology and science.

Authors:  Adam Waytz; Liane Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Jojanneke van der Toorn; Yavor Paunov; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

9.  Learning moral values: Another's desire to punish enhances one's own punitive behavior.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; A Ross Otto; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-06-07

10.  Threats to Moral Identity: Testing the Effects of Incentives and Consequences of One's Actions on Moral Cleansing.

Authors:  Lauren N Harkrider; Michael A Tamborski; Xiaoqian Wang; Ryan P Brown; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.