Literature DB >> 8637961

Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing".

A W Kruglanski1, D M Webster.   

Abstract

A theoretical framework is outlined in which the key construct is the need for (nonspecific) cognitive closure. The need for closure is a desire for definite knowledge on some issue. It represents a dimension of stable individual differences as well as a situationally evocable state. The need for closure has widely ramifying consequences for social-cognitive phenomena at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group levels of analysis. Those consequences derive from 2 general tendencies, those of urgency and performance. The urgency tendency represents an individual's inclination to attain closure as soon as possible, and the permanence tendency represents an individual's inclination to maintain it for as long as possible. Empirical evidence for present theory attests to diverse need for closure effects on fundamental social psychological phenomena, including impression formation, stereotyping, attribution, persuasion, group decision making, and language use in intergroup contexts.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637961     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  81 in total

1.  Friendships Moderate an Association Between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology.

Authors:  Jaime E Settle; Christopher T Dawes; Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  J Polit       Date:  2010

2.  Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Mental fatigue disturbs local processing more than global processing.

Authors:  Dimitri van der Linden; Paul Eling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-06-21

4.  Clinical ethics and the dynamics of group decision-making: applying the psychological data to decisions made by ethics committees.

Authors:  Erica K Rangel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2009-06

5.  Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace.

Authors:  Boaz Hameiri; Roni Porat; Daniel Bar-Tal; Atara Bieler; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Andrea C Dunlavy; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

Review 7.  The Specificity Principle in Acculturation Science.

Authors:  Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

8.  Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal.

Authors:  Jae-Eun Namkoong; Marlone D Henderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  The unintended effects of providing risk information about drinking and driving.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson; Catalina E Kopetz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors.

Authors:  Kathleen C McCulloch; Hong Li; Sungjin Hong; Dolores Albarracin
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.