| Literature DB >> 35958811 |
Ali Moghaddam1, Reza Ranjbar1,2, Mohsen Yazdanian1, Elahe Tahmasebi1, Mostafa Alam3, Kamyar Abbasi4, Zahra Sadat Hosseini5, Hamid Tebyaniyan6.
Abstract
Herbal and chemical products are used for oral care and biofilm treatment and also have been reported to be controversial in the massive trials conducted in this regard. The present review is aimed at evaluating the potential of relevant herbal and chemical products and comparing their outcomes to conventional oral care products and summarizing the current state of evidence of the antibiofilm properties of different products by evaluating studies from the past eleven years. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), essential oils (EOs), and acetylpyridinium chloride were, respectively, the most commonly studied agents in the included studies. As confirmed by all systematic reviews, CHX and EO significantly control the plaque formation and gingival indices. Fluoride is another interesting reagent in oral care products that has shown promising results of oral health improvement, but the evidence quality needs to be refined. The synergy between natural plants and chemical products should be targeted in the future to accede to the formation of new, efficient, and healthy anticaries strategies. Moreover, to discover their biofilm-interfering or biofilm-inhibiting activities, effective clinical trials are needed. In this review article, therapeutic applications of herbal/chemical materials in oral biofilm infections are discussed in recent years (2010-2022).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958811 PMCID: PMC9363208 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8856025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1QS mechanism in gram-categorized species. The canonical QS signaling and the Agr system are the most typical processes involved in the biofilm formation in gram+ bacteria S. aureus. This system includes four genes (AgrA-D) under the control of one operon. The products of this operon include virulence factors such as toxins and proteases. AgrD is converted to autoinducer peptides (AIPs) during secretion through AgrB to out of the cell where it activates the transmembrane AgrC by phosphorylation. The activated AgrC further activates AgrA that promotes the expression of targeted genes by influencing two promoters (P2 and P3). P2 regulates the Agr operon system, and P3 activates the expression of RNAIII which is the key regulator of different factors relating QS and biofilm formation. RNAIII upregulates virulence factors and inhibits factors contributing to bacterial dispersal. The balancing function Agr proteins on bacterial swarming and infection makes them promising targets for developing therapeutic antibiofilm agents [69].
Figure 2QS mechanism in gram-categorized species. In gram− bacteria biofilm formation, QS signaling involve autoinducer acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) that help communication among bacteria and modulate targeted genes expression by activating corresponding cytoplasmic receptors. The Luxl/luxR transcriptional factors are other essential regulating factors activated by AHLs and control the expression of various virulence factors in different gram− bacteria such as pigments, carbohydrate-binding proteins, various proteases such as elastase, toxin, different autoinducers such as Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS), CAI-1, and AI-2, as well as QS receptors such as LasI/LasR, RhlI/RhlR, CqsS, and LuxPQ. Specific autoinducers can also further promote other adhesives and virulence factors [69].
Figure 3The four main stages of biofilm formation process in the oral cavity [25].
In vivo and in vitro studies in oral biofilm treatments.
| Type | Method | Outcomes | Year/Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Herbal materials | |||
| Apple-boysenberry beverage | Quantitation of Lactobacillus spp., | The bioactive beverage reduced the proliferation of | 2017/ [ |
| Cranberry proanthocyanidins | The antibiofilm and anticaries effects of proanthocyanidin's against | Proanthocyanidin treatment inhibited smooth-surface caries in rats. | 2010/ [ |
| Toothpaste and mouth rinse containing natural/herbal agents | Six commercially available products were compared to PBS as control on artificial plaque in animal model. | Four mouth rinses (Tom's Propolis & Myrrh®, Colgate Total 12® toothpaste, Malvatricin® Plus, and PerioGard®) significantly reduced the biofilm viability. | 2019/ [ |
|
| The crude and methanolic extracts of ginger were evaluated at sub-MIC levels on | Both extracts showed strong anticariogenic effect. | 2015/ [ |
|
| The antibacterial activity of the herbal extract was studied on eight oral bacterial strains in vitro. | The extract showed antibacterial activity especially against | 2016/ [ |
|
| The antiadherent and antibiofilm potentials of plants were studied in vitro by evaluating their minimal concentration of adherence (MICA). | Both herbal extracts inhibited | 2014/ [ |
| Garlic | The MIC of garlic extract against | Garlic extract increased the biofilm formation of | 2011/ [ |
| Limonoids | The antibiofilm activity of limonoids against | Limonoids showed significant modulatory functions interfering with biofilm formation. | 2011/ [ |
| Hordenine | The inhibitory activity of hordenine against quorum sensing was studied using high-resolution microscopy and RT-PCR. | Hordenine inhibited quorum sensing of foodborne pathogens by competing with their signaling molecules. | 2018/ [ |
| Quercetin | The effect of quercetin on | Quercetin effectively inhibited the biofilm formation and reduced | 2016/ [ |
| Red wine | The effect of seed extract on an oral supragingival plaque model was studied in vitro and using high-resolution microscopy. | Solutions spiked with seed extract showed antimicrobial effect on 3 of 5 studied strains ( | 2014/ [ |
|
| MIC and MBC tests were performed using the ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of seed and mace of plant in vitro. | The ethanol extract of the plant displayed better antimicrobial potential compared to the ethyl acetate extracts. | 2012/ [ |
|
| MIC and the MBC assays were performed against oral microbiota (10 bacteria and 1 yeast) in vitro. | The most considerable antimicrobial effect belonged to the ethyl acetate extract of | 2014/ [ |
| The essential oils of | The antibiofilm effect was studied in vitro against | Both essential oils displayed antibiofilm effects against all species. | 2014/ [ |
| The commercially available essential oils of 15 plants | MIC and MBC test against a panel of oral bacteria was performed in vitro. | The essential oil of | 2016/ [ |
| Aqua extract of | Colorimetry, microtitration, and resazurin assays were performed using | The extract showed high antibacterial potential against | 2016/ [ |
| Essential oils extracted from 8 Guatemalan medicinal plants | MIC assay was exerted in vitro on |
| 2015/ [ |
|
| In vitro microbial tests and high-resolution microscopy were used to assess the effect of herbal extract against | The extract downregulated the expression of quorum sensing factors and genes encoding glucosyltransferase in | 2021/ [ |
| Quercetin | MIC and MBC assays were evaluated in vitro using | These materials reduced biofilm formation, protein expression, cell proliferation, and glucan production. | 2019/ [ |
|
| The antimicrobial and antibiofilm potentials of a water solution of extract were evaluated on a number of oral pathogens in vitro. | wHCP showed limited antimicrobial potential but high antibiofilm effects against | 2016/ [ |
|
| The antibiofilm and antiacid effects of |
| 2016/ [ |
|
| In vitro microbial tests and microscopy were used to test herb extracts' potential against | Herb extracts synergized the antibiofilm effect of adhesive materials. | 2018/ [ |
|
| The remaining microbial load on the extracted tooth sections after the antimicrobial treatment was evaluated in vitro. | Herb extracts displayed significant antimicrobial effects. | 2015/ [ |
|
|
| Herb extracts significantly reduced the growth amount. | 2013/ [ |
|
| The molecular effect of sub-MIC volume of the essential oil loaded on a chitosan nanogel was evaluated on biofilm formation-associated gene expression of | The expression levels of gtfB, gtfC, gtfD, gbpB, spaP, brpA, relA, and vicR genes showed alterations. | 2019/ [ |
| Methanolic extracts of | The antibiofilm effects of MIC and MBC levels of herb extracts were evaluated on | The herb extracts had significant antimicrobial potential. | 2019/ [ |
|
| Molecular tests were used to assess the antibacterial effect of herbal and chemical medicaments against | The herb extracts showed antibacterial activity lower than calcium hydroxide and higher than saline. | 2019/ [ |
|
| The extract was applied to the polymicrobial plaque model in vitro. | GCE inhibited excess acid production by the biofilms. | 2012/ [ |
|
| The effect of herb oil was studied on | Thymol and thymoquinone (the active constituents of herbal oil) have an inhibitory effect on biofilm formation. | 2020/ [ |
|
| Three concentrations of herb extract were examined on | The biofilm production significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner. | 2015/ [ |
|
| The antibiofilm effect of herb extract against |
| 2014/ [ |
| Chemical materials | |||
| Ethanolic extract of Polish propolis (EEPP) | Clinical-isolated coagulase-negative | EEPP reduced bacterial growth and biofilm formation. | 2013/ [ |
| Chlorhexidine varnish | Digital photography was used in orthodontic patients. | Chlorhexidine varnish decreased bacterial growth. | 2015/ [ |
| Erythritol powder | Periodontal therapy was performed for six months, and microbial/clinical outcomes were assessed in the clinic. | Compared to GPAP, EPAP was less abrasive and produced smaller particles. | 2015/ [ |
| Dentifrice containing | The antibacterial effect of the dentifrice on 3 oral bacteria ( | The tested dentifrice had significant antibacterial effect. | 2016/ [ |
| Methylene blue-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) nanoparticles (MB-NP) | MB-NP was applied to multistrain dental biofilm in vitro and followed by photodynamic therapy (PDT). | The combination of MB-NP and PDT resulted in improving clinical parameters. | 2016/ [ |
| MB-NP | Dental plaques underwent PDT in a clinical pilot study. Planktonic and biofilm phases were assessed in vitro. | PDT was confirmed as a safe treatment that improved clinical parameters. | 2016/ [ |
| Stannous fluoride and zinc citrate dentifrice | Mineralized biofilms were used to examine the antibiofilm potential of mouthwash in vitro and in vivo. | The used dentifrice decreased calcium accumulation in the biofilm. | 2017/ [ |
| Stannous fluoride or triclosan dentifrices | The effects of two dentifrices on oral biofilm models (acid production/glycolysis inhibition) and plaque growth were assessed in vitro and in vivo, respectively. | Stannous fluoride dentifrice significantly reduced glycolysis and plaque growth. | 2017/ [ |
| 3 commercially available kinds of toothpaste | The bactericidal effect of materials on a baseline biofilm flora was examined in vitro. | All kinds of toothpaste showed significant bactericidal effects but were lower than the chlorhexidine mouth rinse. | 2018/ [ |
| Doxycycline hyclate-containing resin |
| The composite resin could eliminate all bacteria. | 2018/ [ |
| Toothpaste containing zinc oxide, zinc citrate, and L-arginine | All silica-based kinds of toothpaste were used on the oral bacteria on the teeth, tongue, cheeks, and gums. | The designed product could significantly reduce bacterial load in all samples. | 2018/ [ |
| Polysiloxane- and chlorhexidine-containing alcoholic solution | The bacterial load on bilateral fixed prostheses or crown restorations with a medicament-coated internal chamber was tested in a clinical study by molecular assays. | Polymeric chlorhexidine-coated implants displayed a limiting effect on the bacterial load of the peri-implant tissue. | 2019/ [ |
| Propolis solution | Digital photography and microbiological quantifications were performed on | Both materials displayed significant bactericidal and antifungal effects. | 2019/ [ |
Figure 4The synthesis of (a) linear polyethyleneimine and (b) branched polyethyleneimine [44].
Figure 5Antibiofilm activities and mechanisms of herbal and neutral materials.
Figure 6Different components of garlic [71].
Figure 7Structure of important bioactive constituents present in garlic [71].
Figure 8Antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal activities of extract of garlic.
Clinical studies in oral biofilm treatments.
| Type | Method | Outcomes | Year/Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Herbal materials | |||
| Allium tuberosum | MIC of extracts and essential oils and their antibiofilm effect against | The | 2011/ [ |
|
| The antimicrobial effect of | An optimum concentration of | 2012/ [ |
|
| The antibacterial effect and cytotoxicity of plant extracts were tested in vitro. | All plant extracts displayed antibacterial effect. | 2013/ [ |
| Mouth rinse containing | The antibacterial effect of |
| 2015/ [ |
| Green tea | Antibacterial effect of the combined mouthwash was evaluated against plaque accumulation. | The combined mouthwash significantly decreased plaque formation. | 2016/ [ |
| Phloretin | The effect of flavonoids on the growth and biofilm formation of | Even sub-MIC values of flavonoids could inhibit the biofilm formation. | 2017/ [ |
|
| The antimicrobial effect was evaluated using molecular methods. | The denture cleanser effectively inhibited biofilm formation by | 2017/ [ |
| Propolis | Antioxidative and antibacterial effects of both materials were compared by evaluating clinical parameters. | Propolis-based formula showed similar clinical chlorhexidine. | 2018/ [ |
|
| Clinical outcomes were evaluated during a 4-week treatment period. | The herb-containing dentifrice showed similar effect to other used mouthwashes on the gingival bleeding. | 2018/ [ |
|
| Antibacterial effect of herb extract against | The herb extract displayed antibiofilm effect on a concentration-dependent manner. | 2018/ [ |
|
| Plaque and gingival clinical parameters as well as participants' perceptions were assessed in recruited subjects. | Chlorhexidine resulted in a better taste, higher antibiofilm effect, and more taste change. | 2019/ [ |
| Mouth rinse containing |
|
| 2019/ [ |
|
| The effect of herb was compared to chlorhexidine in terms of clinical parameters. | The anti-inflammatory potential of two materials displayed to be similar. | 2019/ [ |
| Probiotic yogurt containing | Antibacterial effect of probiotic yogurt on salivary bacteria was evaluated. | The probiotic yogurt significantly reduced the salivary bacteria. | 2020/ [ |
|
| The antimicrobial effect against | All materials improved denture stomatitis and reduce biofilm formation while sodium hypochlorite had the highest efficacy. | 2020/ [ |
| Leaf extracts of | The effect of herb extracts was studied on gingivitis and compared to chlorhexidine gluconate in terms of clinical and oral microbial parameters. |
| 2021/ [ |
| Chemical materials | |||
| Mouthwash containing essential oils | Biofilms were stained and analyzed by microscopy. | Bacterial vitality was reduced significantly. | 2015/ [ |
| Taurolidine | The efficacy of treatments on biofilm removal was evaluated using clinical outcome parameters. | Taurolidine enhanced antibiofilm effect. | 2015/ [ |
| Glycine powder | Both materials were used as air polishing. Gingival and clinical parameters were evaluated. | Glycine powder air polishing significantly improved the measured parameters. | 2015/ [ |
| Polymethyl-methacrylate and Ag nanoparticles | Antibacterial potential of two formulations against cariogenic bacteria was assessed. | Both formulations inhibited biofilm formation of all tested bacteria. | 2015/ [ |
| Toothpaste containing fluoride and fluoride plus sodium trimetaphosphate | The antibiofilm effect of toothpaste was assessed. | The formulations containing sodium trimetaphosphate showed higher antibiofilm potentials. | 2015/ [ |
| Triclosan formula | The antiplaque effects were assessed in vitro. | Including triclosan in formulation significantly inhibited plaque formation. | 2015/ [ |
| Floss impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate | Antibiofilm effect was assessed on 4 different surfaces (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, and distolingual). | Chlorhexidine-impregnated floss displayed synergic reducing effect on supragingival biofilm. | 2015/ [ |
| Chlorhexidine gluconate | The inhibitory effect of all materials against bacterial plaque was evaluated. | All mouthwashes containing the five ingredients significantly reduced the biofilm formation. | 2015/ [ |
| Mouthwash containing | Clinical parameters were evaluated in a clinical trial. | The mouthwash significantly reduced the visible plaque formation and gingival bleeding. | 2016/ [ |
| Triclosan | Clinical parameters were evaluated in a clinical trial. | No considerable change occurred in the plaque and gingival indexes of triclosan-treated subjects. | 2016/ [ |
| Sodium perborate | The antibiofilm effect of disinfection agents was assessed in vitro. | Brushing combined with agents successfully inhibited biofilm formation on dentures. | 2016/ [ |
| Stannous fluoride (SnF2) | Dental plaque was sampled and evaluated in terms of gingival inflammation and bleeding. | SnF2-containing dentifrice improved clinical outcomes of gingivitis and plaque. | 2017/ [ |
| — | Scaling and root planing with or without laser diode was assessed in terms of clinical, microbiological, and inflammatory effects. | Diode laser synergically improved parameters. | 2017/ [ |
| Chlorhexidine solutions | The antiplaque effect on clinical samples was examined in vitro. | The treatment significantly prevented plaque and subgingival biofilm formation. | 2017/ [ |
| Acidulated phosphate fluoride | The antibiofilm effect against salivary | The treatment displayed no inhibitory effect on salivary or biofilm bacterial load. | 2017/ [ |
| Toothpaste containing arginine | Some biochemical and microbial parameters were evaluated. | The treatment reduced lactic acid production. | 2017/ [ |
| Fluoride-impregnated toothbrush | The remained fluoride in saliva and antiplaque effects were evaluated on buccal and lingual surfaces. | Both treatments displayed similar plaque-removing outcomes. | 2017/ [ |
| Saline | The antibiofilm effect against | Only different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite displayed antimicrobial effect. | 2017/ [ |
| Hyaluronic acid mouthwash | Plaque and clinical parameters were evaluated in clinics. | The mouthwash showed a marginally less inhibitory effect on plaque formation compared to chlorhexidine. | 2017/ [ |
| Silver/fluoride nanoparticles | The bactericidal and antibiofilm effects were evaluated on | Nanoparticles were reported to be effective and suggested for clinical application in order to limit dental biofilm formation. | 2017/ [ |
| Mouth rinse containing chlorhexidine gluconate | Antimicrobial effect against | The intense contamination showed no significant difference in the microbial load. | 2017/ [ |
| Probiotic ( | Lozenges were used with scaling and root planning. Clinical, immunological, and microbial parameters were monitored. | The treated subjects displayed higher antibacterial and lower inflammatory effects. | 2018/ [ |
| Propolis/herbs in antioxidant-based formula | A couple clinical parameters were monitored in a 3-month trial study. | The two formulas displayed similar clinical outcomes. | 2018/ [ |
| Sodium bicarbonate | A couple clinical parameters were monitored in a clinical trial. | Sodium bicarbonate displayed increasing antibacterial effect. | 2018/ [ |
| Modified antimicrobial peptide | A couple clinical parameters were evaluated in a clinical trial. | The modified peptide displayed antibacterial effect against periodontal bacteria. | 2018/ [ |
| Fluoridated dentifrice containing arginine | A couple clinical and microbial parameters were examined. | Arginine did not display any additional antibiofilm effect. | 2018/ [ |
| Edathamil-containing gel | Antiplaque effect was evaluated by photography. | Edathamil increased the plaque removal. | 2018/ [ |
| Toothpastes containing different concentrations of sodium bicarbonate | Antiplaque effect was measured before and after a single-timed brushing. | No statistically significant difference was observed. | 2018/ [ |
| Dentifrices containing different ratios of sodium fluoride and tara gum | The fluoride concentration was determined using a physicochemical technique. | The antibiofilm effect displayed no statistically significant differences. | 2018/ [ |
| Chlorhexidine digluconate-impregnated dental floss | The plaque index was assessed in clinics. | The impregnated floss significantly reduced the plaque formation. | 2018/ [ |
| Metronidazole | Subjects were treated with systemic antibiotic as an adjuvant therapy, and antibiofilm outcome was evaluated. | No significant differences were observed in clinical parameters. | 2019/ [ |
| Arginine- or fluoride-containing toothpastes | Caries diagnosis and plaque sampling were performed on tooth surfaces, and antiplaque effects were evaluated in vitro. | The arginine deiminase system was significantly activated, and the acidity was reduced in the plaque. Fluoride reduced plaque lactate production. | 2019/ [ |
| Sodium hypochlorite | Antimicrobial activity was quantified in healthy complete denture wearers through chemical analysis. | Sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine significantly decreased microbial viability. | 2019/ [ |
| Lozenges containing probiotic | Plaque and gingival outcomes were measured in orthodontic brace wearers using molecular analyses. | Treatment had no effect on microbial parameters. | 2019/ [ |
| Mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine and guava | Plaque and gingival indexes were measured. | Plaque and gingival indexes as well as microbial counts showed gradual reduction. | 2019/ [ |
| Triclosan toothpaste | Plaque and gingival indexes were measured. | Triclosan toothpaste displayed antiplaque effect. | 2020/ [ |
| Triclosan toothpaste | Plaque index and gingival bleeding were measured. | Treatment with triclosan toothpaste reduced gingival bleeding and plaque formation. | 2020/ [ |
| Sodium hypochlorite gel | Pocket probing depth was evaluated before and after treatment. | No statistically significant difference was observed. | 2020/ [ |
| Sodium hypochlorite | The antimicrobial effect against | All three treatments significantly reduced the microbial load. | 2020/ [ |
| Ozonated water | The antiplaque and antibiofilm effects were assessed in vitro. | No statistical difference was observed. | 2021/ [ |
| Mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine with or without hydrogen peroxide | The antiplaque effect was studied in vitro. | Both mouth rinses significantly controlled the plaque formation. Hydrogen peroxide had a slightly synergistic effect. | 2021/ [ |