| Literature DB >> 35956812 |
Alexei Lukin1, Mikhail Chudinov1, Tatiana Vedekhina2, Elizaveta Rogacheva3, Lyudmila Kraeva3, Olga Bakulina4, Mikhail Krasavin4,5.
Abstract
The previously reported as well as newly synthesized derivatives of the 1-oxa-9-azaspiro[5.5]undecane were employed in the synthesis of thirty-six derivatives of ciprofloxacin using commercially available 7-chloro-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid and the literature protocol involving the preparation of boron chelate complex to facilitate nucleophilic aromatic substitution. All new fluoroquinolone derivatives were tested against two gram-positive as well as three gram-negative strains of bacteria. With the activity spectrum of the new derivatives being substantially narrower than that of ciprofloxacin, compounds were distinctly active against two of the five strains: gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii 987® and gram-positive Bacillus cereus 138®. Towards these two strains, a large group of compounds displayed equal or higher potency than ciprofloxacin.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; aromatic nucleophilic substitution; ciprofloxacin; piperidines; spirocyclic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956812 PMCID: PMC9370040 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27154864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Scheme 1Synthesis of spirocyclic building blocks 1 via the Prins cyclization and subsequent diversification of spirocyclic piperidine 1a.
Figure 1Structures of exemplary approved fluoroquinolone antibacterials as well as fluoroquinolone chemotype 3 explored in this work.
Figure 2Spirocyclic piperidines 2a–aj employed in this study [11,12,13,14].
Scheme 2Synthesis of novel spirocyclic piperidines 2a, 2d, 2ab, 2af, 2ah, 2ai and 2aj. Reagents and conditions: i. NaH, DMF, 2-chloropyridine, 0 °C → r. t., 16 h; ii. TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 6 h; iii. iBuOCOCl, N-methylmorpholine, THF, −30 → −5 °C; iv. EtC(=NOH)NH2; v. 4M HCl, 1,4-dioxane, 0 °C → r. t., 6 h; vi. cyclopropylNH2, NaBH(OAc)3, DCM, r. t., 18 h; vii. PhCHO, NaBH(OAc)3, DCM, r. t., 18 h; viii. PhCOCl, Et3N, DCM, r. t., 6 h; ix. iPrNCO, 1,4-dioxane, r. t., 6 h; x. EtNCO, 1,4-dioxane, r. t., 6 h; xi. AcCl, Et3N, DCM, r. t., 6 h.
Scheme 3Synthesis of target spirocyclic-periphery fluoroquinolones 3a–aj. Reagents and conditions: i. K2CO3, EtBr, DMF, r. t., 10 h; ii. H3BO3, Ac2O, ZnCl2, r. t. 60 °C; iii. 2a–aj, Et3N, MeCN, 10 h, 60 °C; iv. 2% aq. NaOH.
Antibacterial activity (MIC, mg/mL) of compounds 3a–aj against five bacterial strains in comparison with ciprofloxacin (-: no activity; +: active but MIC is higher than that of ciprofloxacin; ++: MIC same as that of ciprofloxacin; +++: MIC lower than that of ciprofloxacin; NT: not tested).
| Compound | Yield, % | |||||
|
| 44 | - | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 22 | + | + | +++ | - | + |
|
| 27 | + | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 59 | + | + | ++ | + | + |
|
| 50 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 59 | + | + | ++ | - | ++ |
|
| 86 | + | + | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 22 | + | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 63 | + | + | + | - | NT |
|
| 29 | + | + | ++ | - | NT |
|
| 39 | + | - | ++ | - | NT |
|
| 25 | + | - | +++ | - | ++ |
|
| 51 | + | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 35 | + | + | +++ | - | ++ |
|
| 93 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 27 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 54 | + | - | ++ | - | NT |
|
| 47 | + | - | ++ | + | ++ |
|
| 83 | + | + | - | - | NT |
|
| 66 | + | - | + | - | NT |
|
| 83 | + | + | ++ | - | ++ |
|
| 26 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 44 | - | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 38 | + | - | + | - | NT |
|
| 44 | + | + | - | - | NT |
|
| 77 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 61 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 29 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 47 | + | + | + | - | ++ |
|
| 61 | + | + | +++ | - | ++ |
|
| 73 | + | - | ++ | - | NT |
|
| 81 | + | - | +++ | - | NT |
|
| 45 | + | + | + | - | ++ |
|
| 35 | + | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 80 | + | - | - | - | NT |
|
| 39 | + | + | - | - | NT |
| Ciprofloxacin (MIC) | 0.3 μg/mL | 0.3 μg/mL | 0.3 μg/mL | 0.15 μg/mL | 0.3 μg/mL | |
MIC = 0.15 μg/mL; MIC = 0.3 μg/mL.