| Literature DB >> 35954928 |
Florence Mhungu1, Kuncai Chen2,3, Yanyan Wang2,3, Yufei Liu2,3, Yuhua Zhang2,3, Xinhong Pan2,3, Yanfang Cheng2,3, Yungang Liu1, Weiwei Zhang2,3.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) and its compounds are hazardous environmental pollutants with renal toxicity and human carcinogenicity, with ingestion of contaminated foods representing the major mode of exposure. There have been a number of reports evaluating the Cd content in various foods; however, regarding the actual risk posed by dietary cadmium exposure, only a few reports are available in which single point evaluation (less accurate than multiple point evaluation) was employed. In this study, we used a margin of exposure (MOE) model and @RISK software (for multiple evaluation) to evaluate Cd-related health risk in the local Guangzhou residents at varying ages, through a comparison between the estimated monthly exposures and the provisional tolerable monthly intake (0.025 mg/kg body weight (b.w.)), based on the Cd contents in various food categories available locally (a total of 3964 food samples were collected from each of the 13 districts of Guangzhou between 2015 and 2019), which were determined by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. In this study, Cd was detected in 69.6% of the samples (averaged 0.120 mg/kg), and rice and its products, leafy vegetables, bivalves, and shrimp and crabs contributed most to Cd exposure (8.63, 3.18, 2.79, and 1.48 ng/kg b.w./day, respectively). The MOE values demonstrated the following tendency: the younger age group, the lower MOE, and its 95% confidence range for the (youngest) 3~6 year old group started from 0.92, indicating a health risk of young children, while that for the other age groups were all above 1.0. Our preliminary findings warrant further clarification using biomarker assays in the relevant population.Entities:
Keywords: @RISK; cadmium; dietary exposure; margin of exposure (MOE)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954928 PMCID: PMC9367776 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Levels of Cd in foods from Guangzhou during 2016–2019.
| Food Category | Number of Samples | No. of Samples Below LOD | Detection Rate (%) | Level of Cd (mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Means ± S.D. | P50 | P95 | Range | ||||
| Rice and rice products | 859 | 101 | 88.2 | 0.06 ± 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.19 | ND~0.95 |
| Leafy veggies | 251 | 3 | 98.8 | 0.02 ± 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.06 | ND~0.65 |
| Bulb veggies | 21 | 1 | 95 | 0.19 ± 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.99 | ND~0.99 |
| Root veggies | 10 | 0 | 100 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ND~0.03 |
| Fish | 210 | 111 | 47.1 | 0.002 ± 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ND~0.01 |
| Shrimp and crab | 170 | 0 | 100 | 0.24 ± 0.49 | 0.02 | 1.64 | ND~2.36 |
| Bivalve | 260 | 0 | 100 | 1.36 ± 1.86 | 0.37 | 5.76 | ND~10.7 |
| Edible fungus | 60 | 24 | 60 | 0.02± 0.43 | 0.002 | 0.16 | ND~0.18 |
| Pork offal | 68 | 1 | 98.5 | 0.08 ± 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.28 | ND~0.7 |
| Pork | 44 | 10 | 77.3 | 0.002 ± 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.01 | ND~0.02 |
| Beef and lamb | 86 | 70 | 18.6 | 0.0005 ± 0.0008 | 0.01 | 0.11 | ND~0.3 |
| Vegetable oil | 120 | 30 | 75 | 0.002 ± 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.006 | ND~0.02 |
| Egg/egg products | 290 | 262 | 9.7 | 0.0004 ± 0.0003 | 0.01 | 0.001 | ND~0.003 |
| Fresh beans | 50 | 2 | 96 | 0.004 ± 0.0003 | 0.007 | 0.01 | ND~0.05 |
| Fresh fruits | 173 | 1 | 99.4 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | 0.004 | 0.06 | ND~0.14 |
| Maize | 90 | 7 | 92.2 | 0.003 ± 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.009 | ND~0.02 |
| Melons | 101 | 7 | 93.1 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.036 | ND~0.05 |
| Noodles | 563 | 9 | 98.4 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ND~0.05 |
| Nuts | 120 | 29 | 75.8 | 0.04 ± 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.2 | ND~0.32 |
| Poultry | 177 | 109 | 38.4 | 0.0008 ± 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.003 | ND~0.01 |
| Soy products | 110 | 0 | 100 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ND~0.03 |
| Steamed bread | 131 | 1 | 99.2 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | ND~0.02 |
| Total | 3964 | 1206 | 69.6 | 0.12 ± 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.29 | ND~10.7 |
ND: Not detected; LOD: Limit of detection; P50: the 50th percentile; P95: the 95th percentile.
The EDI of Cd from foods presumably consumed Guangzhou residents at varying ages.
| Food Category | DCRP (g/day) in Groups at Varying Ages (Years) | EDI of Cd (ng/kg b.w./day) in Groups at Varying Age (Years) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3~6 | 7~17 | 18~59 | ≥60 | Total | 3~6 | 7~17 | 18~59 | ≥60 | Total | |
| Beef and lamb | 7.6 ± 15.4 | 14 ± 23 | 16 ± 27 | 9.9 ± 17 | 15 ± 25 | 0.002 (0~0.04) | 0.004 (0~0.03) | 0.004 (0~0.05) | 0.003 (0~0.04) | 0.004 (0~0.04) |
| Bivalve | 0.8 ± 4.2 | 1.9 ± 7.8 | 2.2 ± 8.9 | 2.2 ± 7.9 | 2.0 ± 8.4 | 1.12 (0~9.1) | 2.65 (0~29.4) | 3.07 (0~33.9) | 3.07 (0~30.1) | 2.79 (0~35.6) |
| Bulb vegetables | 3.1 ± 9.5 | 4.5 ± 13 | 5.6 ± 14 | 6.9 ± 14 | 5.2 ± 13 | 0.09 (0~0.12) | 0.13 (0~0.29) | 0.17 (0~1.0) | 0.21 (0~0.35) | 0.16 (0~0.22) |
| Shrimp and crab | 3 ± 8.6 | 4.9 ± 14 | 6.3 ± 20 | 6.7 ± 18 | 5.7 ± 18 | 0.78 (0~7.29) | 1.27 (0~15.3) | 1.63 (0~25.78) | 1.74 (0~20.58) | 1.48 (0~6.9) |
| Edible fungus | 1.7 ± 7.4 | 2.5 ± 8.3 | 2.6 ± 9.6 | 4.3 ± 15.4 | 2.6 ± 9.6 | 0.73 (0~0.31) | 0.11 (0~1.15) | 0.11 (0~1.26) | 0.18 (0~2.17) | 0.11 (0~0.95) |
| Vegetable oil | 0.1 ± 1.7 | 0 ± 0.3 | 0.2 ± 2.2 | 0.0005 ± 0 | 0.1 ± 1.8 | 0.0003 (0~0.01) | 0.001 (0~0.01) | 0.001 (0~0.01) | 0 (0~0) | 0.0003 (0~0.01) |
| Egg/egg products | 34 ± 30 | 32 ± 30 | 31 ± 30 | 31 ± 26 | 31 ± 30 | 0.01 (0~0.03) | 0.01 (0~0.08) | 0.01 (0~0.04) | 0.01 (0~0.04) | 0.01 (0~0.06) |
| Fish | 27 ± 29 | 38 ± 36 | 46 ± 43 | 49 ± 38 | 43 ± 41 | 0.008 (0~0.17) | 0.01 (0~0.27) | 0.01 (0~0.27) | 0.02 (0~0.61) | 0.01 (0~0.85) |
| Fresh beans | 1.8 ± 5.4 | 4.1 ± 16 | 3.8 ± 14 | 2.2 ± 9 | 3.6 ± 14 | 0.11 (0~0.35) | 0.19 (0~0.53) | 0.19 (0~0.71) | 0.16 (0~0.52) | 0.18 (0~0.58) |
| Fresh fruits | 45 ± 59 | 48 ± 72 | 47 ± 69 | 40 ± 58 | 47 ± 68 | 0.60 (0~1.59) | 0.60(0~3.12) | 3.23 (0~2.66) | 0.49 (0~3.42) | 0.58 (0~2.23) |
| Leafy veggies | 64 ± 54 | 110 ± 75 | 132 ± 93 | 144 ± 98 | 122 ± 290 | 1.68 (0~5.62) | 2.86 (0~6.37) | 3.43 (0~12.20) | 3.77 (0~10.5) | 3.18 (0~8.18) |
| Maize | 6.3 ± 8.8 | 7 ± 18 | 9.2 ± 28 | 15 ± 28 | 14 ± 842 | 0.19 (0~0.18) | 0.03 (0~0.22) | 1.04 (0~0.2) | 0.04 (0~0.29) | 0.03 (0~0.22) |
| Melons | 48 ± 41 | 77 ± 65 | 96 ± 84 | 101 ± 102 | 89 ± 80 | 0.47 (0~2.33) | 0.75 (0~3.10) | 0.94 (0~4.18) | 10.83 (0~4.70) | 0.87 (0~2.61) |
| Noodles | 33 ± 42 | 48 ± 59 | 52 ± 59 | 53 ± 62 | 50 ± 58 | 0.48 (0~1.58) | 0.71 (0~2.51) | 0.77 (0~2.30) | 0.78 (0~3.12) | 0.74 (0~2.08) |
| Nuts | 2.5 ± 4.7 | 2.2 ± 7.6 | 2.2 ± 7.6 | 1.1 ± 3.9 | 2.2 ± 11 | 0.12 (0~0.89) | 0.10 (0~1.22) | 0.10 (0~0.69) | 0.05 (0~0.33) | 0.11 (0~1.03) |
| Pork | 60 ± 43 | 88 ± 64 | 99 ± 70 | 94 ± 63 | 93 ± 67 | 0.32 (0~0.64) | 0.47 (0~2.34) | 0.52 (0~2.28) | 0.50 (0~0.57) | 0.49 (0~0.90) |
| Pork offal | 2.7 ± 9.9 | 4.8 ± 14 | 5.7 ± 17 | 6.3 ± 17 | 5.3 ± 16 | 0.28 (0~1.43) | 0.49 (0~3.62) | 0.59(0~2.73) | 0.64 (0~4.2) | 0.54(0~2.93) |
| Poultry | 28 ± 32 | 45 ± 41 | 50 ± 48 | 42 ± 37 | 47 ± 45 | 0.01 (0~0.101) | 0.01 (0.01~0.11) | 0.02 (0~0.12) | 0.01 (0~0.11) | 0.01 (0~0.14) |
| Rice and rice products | 79 ± 46 | 121 ± 74 | 147 ± 91 | 148 ± 90 | 136 ± 87 | 4.99 (0 ~ 24.86) | 7.71 (0 ~28.19) | 9.31 (0~34.87) | 9.44 (0~37.32) | 8.63 (0~28.52) |
| Root veggies | 15 ± 25 | 21 ± 35 | 22± 35 | 22 ± 37 | 26 ± 37 | 0.74 (0~2.55) | 0.73 (0~3.43) | 0.76 (0~3.18) | 0.89 (0~9.12) | 0.74 (0~2.71) |
| Soy products | 18 ± 33 | 29 ± 50 | 29 ± 50 | 25 ± 42 | 28 ± 48 | 0.40 (0~2.11) | 0.66 (0~3.21) | 0.66 (0~2.55) | 0.57 (0~2.34) | 0.63 (0~3.45) |
| Steamed bread | 40 ± 43 | 59 ± 65 | 49 ± 58 | 46 ± 54 | 50 ± 58 | 0.43 (0~1.23) | 0.63 (0~1.62) | 0.53 (0~1.62) | 3.98 (0~2) | 0.50 (0~1.67) |
| Total | 12.5 (0~42.2) | 20.1 (0~66.2) | 23.4 (0~70.5) | 24.1 (0~67.7) | 21.8 (0~80.9) | |||||
EDI: Estimated daily intake, DCRP: dietary consumption per reference person. The EDI values of Cd are expressed as the 95% confidence intervals; the lower limits of intervals were negative, so they are expressed here as zero.
MOE-based risk characterization of dietary Cd exposure in Guangzhou residents at varying ages.
| Age (Year) | Monthly Dietary Intake of Cd (μg/kg b.w.) | Contribution to PTMI (%) | MOE (95% Confidence Range) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3~6 | 18.8 (13.9~22.8) | 75.0 | 1.33 (0.92~3.12) |
| 7~17 | 15.1 (10.6~18.4) | 60.3 | 1.65 (1.31~3.4) |
| 18~59 | 11.3 (8.5~13.1) | 45.4 | 2.21 (2.14~6.18) |
| >60 | 12.0 (10.7~15.9) | 48.1 | 2.08 (1.5~4.93) |
| Total | 10.9 (7.5~13.1) | 43.6 | 2.29 (1.92~4.81) |
Each MOE value was obtained by dividing PTMI (25 μg/kg B.W.) by EDI.