Literature DB >> 16891049

Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic report of an International Conference organized by EFSA and WHO with support of ILSI Europe.

S Barlow1, A G Renwick, J Kleiner, J W Bridges, L Busk, E Dybing, L Edler, G Eisenbrand, J Fink-Gremmels, A Knaap, R Kroes, D Liem, D J G Müller, S Page, V Rolland, J Schlatter, A Tritscher, W Tueting, G Würtzen.   

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), with the support of the International Life Sciences Institute, European Branch (ILSI Europe), organized an international conference on 16-18 November 2005 to discuss how regulatory and advisory bodies evaluate the potential risks of the presence in food of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. The objectives of the conference were to discuss the possible approaches for risk assessment of such substances, how the approaches may be interpreted and whether they meet the needs of risk managers. ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) provides advice based solely on hazard identification and does not take into account either potency or human exposure. The use of quantitative low-dose extrapolation of dose-response data from an animal bioassay raises numerous scientific uncertainties related to the selection of mathematical models and extrapolation down to levels of human exposure. There was consensus that the margin of exposure (MOE) was the preferred approach because it is based on the available animal dose-response data, without extrapolation, and on human exposures. The MOE can be used for prioritisation of risk management actions but the conference recognised that it is difficult to interpret it in terms of health risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16891049     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  23 in total

Review 1.  Metabolism and biomarkers of heterocyclic aromatic amines in molecular epidemiology studies: lessons learned from aromatic amines.

Authors:  Robert J Turesky; Loic Le Marchand
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Risk of dietary exposure to aflatoxins and fumonisins in infants less than 6 months of age in Rombo, Northern Tanzania.

Authors:  Happy Magoha; Martin Kimanya; Bruno De Meulenaer; Dominique Roberfroid; Carl Lachat; Patrick Kolsteren
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Study on inter-ethnic human differences in bioactivation and detoxification of estragole using physiologically based kinetic modeling.

Authors:  Jia Ning; Jochem Louisse; Bert Spenkelink; Sebastiaan Wesseling; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Exposure assessment and risk characterization of aflatoxin B1 in Malaysia.

Authors:  Yin-Hui Leong; Ahmad Rosma; Aishah A Latiff; Nurul Izzah Ahmad
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.833

5.  A margin of exposure approach to assessment of non-cancerous risk of diethyl phthalate based on human exposure from bottled water consumption.

Authors:  Maryam Zare Jeddi; Noushin Rastkari; Reza Ahmadkhaniha; Masud Yunesian; Ramin Nabizadeh; Reza Daryabeygi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Can estragole in fennel seed decoctions really be considered a danger for human health? A fennel safety update.

Authors:  L Gori; E Gallo; V Mascherini; A Mugelli; A Vannacci; F Firenzuoli
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; George P Daston; R Julian Preston; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

8.  Electronic Cigarette Refill Fluids Sold Worldwide: Flavor Chemical Composition, Toxicity, and Hazard Analysis.

Authors:  Esther E Omaiye; Wentai Luo; Kevin J McWhirter; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Health risk assessment of ochratoxin A for all age-sex strata in a market economy.

Authors:  T Kuiper-Goodman; C Hilts; S M Billiard; Y Kiparissis; I D K Richard; S Hayward
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2010-02

Review 10.  Genomic impact of cigarette smoke, with application to three smoking-related diseases.

Authors:  M Talikka; N Sierro; N V Ivanov; N Chaudhary; M J Peck; J Hoeng; C R E Coggins; M C Peitsch
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.