| Literature DB >> 35954589 |
Hsiu-Ju Jen1,2, Kuei-Ru Chou1,2,3,4,5, Ching-Yi Chang1,2.
Abstract
Nursing staff who are competent to use personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly can protect themselves while providing safe, high-quality care to patients. Under pandemic conditions, the ability to wear PPE correctly is essential in clinical practice, but the acquisition of correct PPE-wearing procedures is difficult for most staff in the absence of live practice drills. This study aimed to test the mobile video online learning approach by integrating PPE contexts into a digital learning system. We conducted an experiment to verify whether the mobile video online learning approach could effectively improve nursing staff's learning achievement, learning anxiety, critical thinking skills, and learning self-efficacy. The study used a quasi-experimental design and was conducted with 47 nursing staff, divided into one group using a mobile video online learning approach and one group with a conventional learning approach. We used pre-and post-test examinations of learning achievements, learning anxiety, critical thinking, and learning self-efficacy. Results showed a significant effect of using the mobile video online learning method in helping nursing staff to decrease learning anxiety and improve knowledge about COVID-19 protection, increase learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and learning self-efficacy. These benefits are of interest to nursing workplace managers wishing to maintain professional standards during epidemics by improving the nursing staff's PPE knowledge and self-efficacy concerning PPE.Entities:
Keywords: mobile video online learning approach; nurses’ education; nursing; personal protective equipment
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954589 PMCID: PMC9368655 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Participant demographic data.
| Category | Experimental Group ( | Control Group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years | ||
| <25 | 16 (69.6%) | 15 (62.5%) |
| 25–30 | 7 (30.4%) | 9 (37.5%) |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 21 (91.3%) | 23 (95.8%) |
| Male | 2 (8.7%) | 1 (4.2%) |
| Duration of hospital experience | ||
| 3–6 months | 2 (9%) | 1 (4%) |
| 6–12 months | 8 (35%) | 9 (38%) |
| >1 year | 13 (57%) | 14 (58%) |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 22 (95.7%) | 22 (91.7%) |
| Married | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (8.3%) |
| Education level | ||
| Junior college | 17 (73.9%) | 16 (66.7%) |
| University | 5 (21.7%) | 6 (25%) |
| Graduate school | 1 (4.3%) | 2 (8.3%) |
t-test results for learning achievement, learning anxiety, critical thinking, and learning self-efficacy.
| Variable | Groups |
| Mean | SD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning achievement | Experimental group | 23 | 4.74 | 0.31 | 1.77 * | 0.53 |
| Control group | 24 | 4.53 | 0.36 | |||
| Learning anxiety | Experimental group | 23 | 4.74 | 0.31 | 1.87 * | 0.60 |
| Control group | 24 | 4.53 | 0.36 | |||
| Critical thinking | Experimental group | 23 | 4.74 | 0.31 | 1.57 * | 0.38 |
| Control group | 24 | 4.53 | 0.36 | |||
| Learning self-efficacy | Experimental group | 23 | 4.74 | 0.31 | 1.80 * | 0.57 |
| Control group | 24 | 4.53 | 0.36 |
* p < 0.05.