Literature DB >> 33410756

Configuration of Mobile Learning Tools to Support Basic Physical Assessment in Nursing Education: Longitudinal Participatory Design Approach.

H Ösp Egilsdottir1, Lena Günterberg Heyn1, Espen Andreas Brembo1, Kirsten Røland Byermoen1, Anne Moen2, Hilde Eide1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As many students in higher education are skilled users of mobile technology, mobile learning (mLearning) can be a promising educational strategy to enhance their learning experience. mLearning might also be well suited for nursing students as they navigate between multiple learning contexts in their educational curriculum. As an educational strategy, mLearning may also reduce challenges caused by the theory-practice gap in nursing by supporting skills and knowledge transfer between the university and clinical settings. As the introduction of basic physical assessment skills (B-PASs) into Norwegian bachelor's degree education in nursing occurred quite recently, there is a lack of competence in supervision and teaching in both university and clinical settings. As such, mLearning appears to be a good strategy to support student B-PAS learning and knowledge transfer across learning contexts.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore and elicit the perspectives of students regarding the way in which a selection of digital learning resources supports B-PAS learning and application in clinical rotation, which of the selected digital learning resources are beneficial to include in a suite of mLearning tools, and how the selected digital learning resources could support the transfer of skills and knowledge from the academic to clinical context.
METHODS: We used a longitudinal participatory design approach to co-design a suite of mLearning tools. The co-design processes took place in several workshops (WSs) over a period of 3 months: 2 WSs with first-year students (n=6), 3 WSs with second-year students (n=6), and 3 WSs with third-year students (n=8). The students evaluated several digital learning resources in both academic and clinical contexts. The digital learning resources included digital simulation with virtual patients, massive open online courses, and multimedia learning material. In the co-design WS, the potential and benefits of these digital learning resources for the learning and application of B-PASs were explored.
RESULTS: The students reported that the digital learning resources stimulated learning in 7 different ways. They also emphasized the importance of including all selected and tested digital learning resources. Moreover, students supported the inclusion of additional learning material, such as multiple-choice tests and written assignments, aimed at providing feedback and contributing to knowledge development.
CONCLUSIONS: The co-design processes and collaboration with the nursing students provided insight into how a suite of mLearning tools may support the learning and application of B-PASs and human bioscience knowledge in clinical rotation. From the students' perspective, one of the strengths of the suite of mLearning tools was the range of content, as this met a broader range of student learning preferences regarding learning B-PASs. The suite of mLearning tools contributes to and supports skills training and knowledge transfer between multiple learning contexts. ©H Ösp Egilsdottir, Lena Günterberg Heyn, Espen Andreas Brembo, Kirsten Røland Byermoen, Anne Moen, Hilde Eide. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 07.01.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical competence; computer simulation; education, clinical; education, nursing; learning; mobile application; mobile phone; nursing skills; physical examination; students, nursing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33410756      PMCID: PMC7819782          DOI: 10.2196/22633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  26 in total

1.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Physical assessment: a continuing need for clarification.

Authors:  Anita Fennessey; Ruth A Wittmann-Price
Journal:  Nurs Forum       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Mobile technology in nursing education: where do we go from here? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Janet Raman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  The effectiveness of web-based learning in supporting the development of nursing students' practical skills during clinical placements: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Michela Barisone; Annamaria Bagnasco; Giuseppe Aleo; Gianluca Catania; Massimo Bona; Stefano Gabriele Scaglia; Milko Zanini; Fiona Timmins; Loredana Sasso
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.281

5.  Can Mobile Devices Be Used as an Active Learning Strategy? Student Perceptions of Mobile Device Use in a Nursing Course.

Authors:  Cara Gallegos; Pamela Gehrke; Hannah Nakashima
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.082

6.  Nursing students' experiences of using a smart phone application for a physical assessment course: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Li-Ling Hsu; Hsiu-Chuan Hsiang; Yi-Hua Tseng; Siang-Yun Huang; Suh-Ing Hsieh
Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 1.418

7.  Using Co-Design with Nursing Students to Create Educational Apps for Clinical Training.

Authors:  Siobhan O'Connor; Tom Andrews
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016

8.  To dwell within: Bridging the theory-practice gap.

Authors:  Mark Zieber; Bernadine Wojtowicz
Journal:  Nurs Philos       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  Participatory design methods in telemedicine research.

Authors:  Jane Clemensen; Mette J Rothmann; Anthony C Smith; Liam J Caffery; Dorthe B Danbjorg
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 10.  The 'five rights' of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students' ability to identify and manage clinically 'at risk' patients.

Authors:  Tracy Levett-Jones; Kerry Hoffman; Jennifer Dempsey; Sarah Yeun-Sim Jeong; Danielle Noble; Carol Anne Norton; Janiece Roche; Noelene Hickey
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nursing students' development of using physical assessment in clinical rotation-a stimulated recall study.

Authors:  Kirsten Røland Byermoen; Tom Eide; H Ösp Egilsdottir; Hilde Eide; Lena Günterberg Heyn; Anne Moen; Espen Andreas Brembo
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  The value of a redesigned clinical course during COVID-19 pandemic: an explorative convergent mixed-methods study.

Authors:  H Ösp Egilsdottir; Lena Günterberg Heyn; Espen Andreas Brembo; Kirsten Røland Byermoen; Anne Moen; Hilde Eide
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-04-24

3.  Fostering Nursing Staff Competence in Personal Protective Equipment Education during COVID-19: A Mobile-Video Online Learning Approach.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ju Jen; Kuei-Ru Chou; Ching-Yi Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.