| Literature DB >> 35953994 |
Lisa M Abegglen1,2,3, Tara M Harrison2,3,4, Anneke Moresco3,4,5, Jared S Fowles1, Brigid V Troan3,4, Wendy K Kiso6, Dennis Schmitt7, Amy M Boddy2,3,8, Joshua D Schiffman1,2,3,9.
Abstract
Reproductive tumors can impact conception, pregnancy, and birth in mammals. These impacts are well documented in humans, while data in other mammals are limited. An urgent need exists to understand the reproductive impact of these lesions in endangered species, because some endangered species have a documented high prevalence of reproductive tumors. This article documents that the prevalence of both benign and malignant neoplasia differs between African and Asian elephants, with Asian elephants more frequently diagnosed and negatively affected by both. The prevalence of these tumors across mammalian species is compared, and impact plus treatment options in human medicine are reviewed to inform decision making in elephants. Evidence suggests that reproductive tumors can negatively impact elephant conservation. Future studies that document reproductive outcomes, including the success of various treatment approaches in elephants with tumors will benefit conservation efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Elephas maximus; Loxodonta africana; comparative oncology; fertility; fibroid; leiomyoma; neoplasia; prevention; treatment; uterine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35953994 PMCID: PMC9367617 DOI: 10.3390/ani12152005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Reproductive lesions reported in female elephants.
| Diagnosis | Elephant Species | Age (Years) | Reported Cases/Total (Prevalence) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uterine leiomyoma |
| 12–57 | 19/27 (70%) | [ |
| 38 ± 8.49 (mean ± SD for acyclic) | 6/37 (16%) | [ | ||
| NR | 27/27 (100%) | [ | ||
| 13–71 | 57/80 (71%) | [ | ||
| 52 | 1 | [ | ||
| 21–46 | 20/56 (36%) | [ | ||
| 15 & 50 | 2 | [ | ||
| 50 | 1 | [ | ||
| 58 | 1 | [ | ||
| 39–59 (3/7 reported) | 7/19 (37%) | [ | ||
| Uterine adenocarcinoma |
| 45–65 | 8/80 (10%) | [ |
| 56 | 1 | [ | ||
| 59 (1/3 reported) | 3/19 (16%) | [ | ||
| Anaplastic carcinoma (uterus) |
| 60 | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Carcinoma in situ in endometrial polyp |
| 57 | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (uterus) |
| 48 | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Angiosarcoma (uterus) |
| 50 | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Anaplastic sarcoma (pelvic mass of presumed uterine origin) |
| 53 | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Endometrial cysts |
| NR | NR | [ |
|
| NR | NR | [ | |
| Ovarian carcinoma |
| NR | 1/80 (1%) | [ |
| Ovarian cysts |
| NR | NR | [ |
|
| NR | NR | [ | |
|
| NR | 11/80 (14%) | [ | |
| Bilateral multilocular serous ovarian cystadenoma |
| 59 | 1 | [ |
| Hyperplastic endometrial disease |
| 12–46 | 2/13 (15%) | [ |
|
| 12–57 | 18/27 (67%) | ||
| Vestibular cysts |
| NR | NR | [ |
|
| NR | NR | ||
| Vestibular polyps |
| NR | NR | [ |
| Vaginal leiomyoma |
| NR | 1 | [ |
| Hyperplastic, polyploidy or papillomatous mucosal lesions of vagina/vulva |
| NR | 10/80 (13%) | [ |
| Vagina polyps |
| 28 | 3/19 (16%) | [ |
|
| 30 & 40 | |||
| Vulvar polyps |
| 45 | 1/19 (5%) | [ |
| Uterine polyps |
| 50 | 1/19 (5%) | [ |
| Uterus undifferentiated malignant neoplasm |
| NR | 1/19 (5%) | [ |
NR = not reported.
Summary of studies evaluating prevalence of uterine leiomyomas, total populations included individuals without neoplasia.
| Species | Uterine Leiomyoma Cases/Total Population Assessed (Prevalence) | Population Assessed | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primates | |||
| Human | * (4.5–68.6%) | Europe | [ |
| North America | [ | ||
| South America | [ | ||
| Africa | [ | ||
| Asia | [ | ||
| Middle East | [ | ||
| Chimpanzee | 9/16 (56.3%) | Laboratory, >35yr | [ |
| 20/32 (62.5%) | Laboratory, >35y | [ | |
| 7/80 (8.8%) | African Sanctuaries | (Moresco and Feltrer unpublished data) | |
| Gorilla, Mountain gorilla ( | Not reported (0%) | [ | |
| 3/14 (21%) | U.S. zoos | [ | |
| Orangutan | 3/24 (12.5%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| Proboscidea (elephants) | |||
| Asian elephant | 57/80 (71.3%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| 27/27 (100%) | U.S. and European zoos | [ | |
| U.S. zoos | |||
| 19/27 (70.3%) | U.S. zoos | [ | |
| African elephant | 0/8 (0%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| 0/13 (0%) | U.S. zoos | [ | |
| Perissodactyla (odd-toed ungulates) | |||
| Rhinoceros, greater one-horned | 4/5 (80%) | U.S. and European zoos | [ |
| Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) | |||
| Bongo ( | 9/11 (81.8%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| Suidae | 32/97 (33%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| Tayassuidae | 0/11 (0%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| Carnivora (carnivores) | |||
| Canidae | 281 (2.5%) | U.S. zoos | [ |
| 42/122 (34.4%) | North American zoos | [ | |
| 2/80 (2.5%) | North and South American zoos | [ | |
| European zoos | |||
| 5/38 (13%) | North American zoos | [ | |
| 10/97 (10.3%) | North American zoos | [ | |
| 1/115 (0.9%) | North and South American zoos | [ |
* For cases/total population assessed, see the referenced literature. ** Evaluated necropsies 1988–2019 [16]. *** Evaluated necropsies from 1975 to 1995 at National Zoo [32].
Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas among animals reported to the Exotic Species Cancer Research Alliance (ESCRA) database (animals with neoplasia).
| Species | Uterine Leiomyoma Cases/Total Cases of Cancer in ESCRA Database (Prevalence) |
|---|---|
| African lion * ( | 6/33 (18%) |
| Bison ( | 2/2 (100%) |
| Black lemur ( | 3/4 (75%) |
| Coquerel’s giant mouse lemur ( | 2/6 (33%) |
| Capybara ( | 1/4 (25%) |
| Caracal ( | 1/1 (100%) |
| Chimpanzee ** ( | 2/4 (50%) |
| Chinchilla ( | 1/2 (50%) |
| Cottonmouth ( | 1/4 (25%) |
| Giant anteater ( | 1/1 (100%) |
| Greater Rhea ( | 1/4 (25%) |
| Mandrill ( | 1/1 (100%) |
| Nile lechwe ( | 1/1 (100%) |
| Patas monkey ( | 1/3 (33%) |
| Pygmy goat ( | 1/3 (33%) |
| Pygmy hippopotamus ( | 1/1 (100%) |
| Red river hog ( | 1/1(100%) |
| Red wolf ( | 1/3(33%) |
| Skunk ( | 1/3 (33%) |
| Slender tailed meerkat ( | 2/5 (40%) |
| Tufted grey langur ( | 1/2 (50%) |
| Zebra, multiple subspecies ( | 1/71 (1.4%) |
* African lion with leiomyoma that was diagnosed and treated prior to death: surgical removal through ovariohysterectomy. ** Chimpanzee with leiomyoma was assessed for surgery, but surgery was not possible due to size and location of tumor.