Literature DB >> 32687166

The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.

Christina B Welch1, Jeferson M Lourenco1, Dylan B Davis1, Taylor R Krause1, Mia N Carmichael1, Michael J Rothrock2, T Dean Pringle1, Todd R Callaway1.   

Abstract

Feed is the greatest cost of animal production, so reducing it is critical to increase producer profits. In ruminants, the microbial population within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is critical to nutrient digestion and absorption in both the rumen and the hindgut. The objective of this study was to determine the bacterial taxonomic profile of the rumen, cecum, and feces of feedlot steers at slaughter in order to link feed efficiency and the GIT bacterial populations from these three locations. Twenty commercial Angus steers were selected and divided into two groups according to their residual feed intake (RFI) classification determined during the feedlot-finishing period: high-RFI (n = 10) and low-RFI (n = 10). After the ruminal, cecal, and fecal samples were collected at slaughter, DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on them to determine their bacterial composition. One-way ANOVA was performed on the animal performance data, alpha diversities, and bacterial abundances using RFI classification as the fixed effect. Overall, the ruminal bacterial population was the most different in terms of taxonomic profile compared with the cecal and fecal populations as revealed by beta diversity analysis (P < 0.001). Moreover, bacterial richness (Chao1) was greatest (P = 0.01) in the rumen of the high-RFI group compared with the low-RFI group. In contrast, bacterial richness and diversity in the intestinal environment showed that Chao1 was greater (P = 0.01) in the cecum, and the Shannon diversity index was greater in both the cecum and feces of low-RFI compared with high-RFI steers (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Ruminococcaceae was more abundant in the low-RFI group in the cecum and feces (P = 0.01); fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was more abundant in high-RFI steers (P = 0.03). No correlations (P ≥ 0.13) between any ruminal bacterial family and RFI were detected; however, Ruminococcaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Christensenellaceae, and BS11 were negatively correlated with RFI (P < 0.05) in the cecum and feces. Succinivibrionaceae in the cecum was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.05), and fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.03). Results collectively indicate that in addition to the ruminal bacteria, the lower gut bacterial population has a significant impact on feed efficiency and nutrient utilization in feedlot steers; therefore, the intestinal bacteria should also be considered when examining the basis of ruminant feed efficiency.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid; Ruminococcaceae; feedlot cattle; gastrointestinal microbiota; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32687166      PMCID: PMC7392532          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  30 in total

1.  Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages.

Authors:  Yunhong Kong; Ronald Teather; Robert Forster
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers.

Authors:  P A Lancaster; G E Carstens; D H Crews; T H Welsh; T D A Forbes; D W Forrest; L O Tedeschi; R D Randel; F M Rouquette
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal tract microbiota and probiotics in production animals.

Authors:  Carl J Yeoman; Bryan A White
Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 8.923

Review 4.  Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Bo-Ra Kim; Jiwon Shin; Robin Guevarra; Jun Hyung Lee; Doo Wan Kim; Kuk-Hwan Seol; Ju-Hoon Lee; Hyeun Bum Kim; Richard Isaacson
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.351

5.  Feed efficiency phenotypes in lambs involve changes in ruminal, colonic, and small-intestine-located microbiota.

Authors:  K Perea; K Perz; S K Olivo; A Williams; M Lachman; S L Ishaq; J Thomson; C J Yeoman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Analysis of the gut bacterial communities in beef cattle and their association with feed intake, growth, and efficiency.

Authors:  P R Myer; H C Freetly; J E Wells; T P L Smith; L A Kuehn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Cecum microbial communities from steers differing in feed efficiency.

Authors:  P R Myer; J E Wells; T P L Smith; L A Kuehn; H C Freetly
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Fredrik Bäckhed; Peter Turnbaugh; Catherine A Lozupone; Robin D Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Comparison of the ruminal and fecal microbiotas in beef calves supplemented or not with concentrate.

Authors:  Jeferson M Lourenco; Troy J Kieran; Darren S Seidel; Travis C Glenn; Magali F da Silveira; Todd R Callaway; R Lawton Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.

Authors:  Luke K Fuerniss; Kelly K Kreikemeier; Lynn D Reed; Matt D Cravey; Bradley J Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Fecal Microbiome Differences in Angus Steers with Differing Feed Efficiencies during the Feedlot-Finishing Phase.

Authors:  Jeferson M Lourenco; Christina B Welch; Taylor R Krause; Michael A Wieczorek; Francis L Fluharty; Michael J Rothrock; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  2-Hydroxy-4-(Methylthio) Butanoic Acid Isopropyl Ester Supplementation Altered Ruminal and Cecal Bacterial Composition and Improved Growth Performance of Finishing Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Xiaoli Qin; Depeng Zhang; Xinjun Qiu; Kai Zhao; Siyu Zhang; Chunlan Liu; Lianqiang Lu; Yafang Cui; Changxiao Shi; Zhiming Chen; Rikang Hao; Yingqi Li; Shunran Yang; Lina Wang; Huili Wang; Binghai Cao; Huawei Su
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Rumen Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Hao Wu; Wanbao Chen; Chang Liu; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  Changes in immune system and intestinal bacteria of cows during the transition period.

Authors:  S Chida; M Sakamoto; T Takino; S Kawamoto; K Hagiwara
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-02

6.  Small Intestine Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Chang Liu; Hao Wu; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Impact of concentrations of camphor on the in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation from goats selected for consumption of low and high levels of Juniperus spp.-2.

Authors:  Darren S Seidel; John W Walker; Jeffrey M Musser; Jeferson M Lourenco; Christina B Welch; Travis R Whitney; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-27

8.  The diversity analysis and gene function prediction of intestinal bacteria in three equine species.

Authors:  Wuyundalai Bao; Jinghe Yu; Yuxing He; Mingchao Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.064

9.  Characterization of rumen, fecal, and milk microbiota in lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Jenna R Williamson; Todd R Callaway; Jeferson M Lourenco; Valerie E Ryman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.064

10.  Evaluation of the Fecal Bacterial Communities of Angus Steers With Divergent Feed Efficiencies Across the Lifespan From Weaning to Slaughter.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Jeferson M Lourenco; Taylor R Krause; Darren S Seidel; Francis L Fluharty; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.