Literature DB >> 35950190

Ceftazidime-avibactam based combinations against carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring hypervirulence plasmids.

Zackery P Bulman1, Xing Tan1, Ting-Yu Chu2, Yanqin Huang1, Amisha P Rana1, Nidhi Singh1, Stephanie A Flowers1, Yasuhiro Kyono1, Barry N Kreiswirth2,3, Liang Chen2,3.   

Abstract

The combination of carbapenem resistance and hypervirulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae is an emerging and urgent threat due to its potential to resist common antibiotics and cause life-threatening infections in healthy hosts. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of clinically relevant antibiotic regimens against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae with hypervirulence plasmids and to identify pathways associated with antibiotic tolerance using transcriptomics. We studied two carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates, CDI694 and CDI231, both harboring hypervirulence plasmids. Time-kill and dynamic one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assays were used to assess ceftazidime/avibactam-based therapies. RNAseq was performed following 48 h of antibiotic exposure. Closed genomes of CDI694 and CDI231 were obtained; each isolate harbored carbapenem-resistance and hypervirulence (containing rmpA/rmpA2 and iut genes) plasmids. Ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens were bactericidal, though both isolates continued to grow in the presence of antibiotics despite no shifts in MIC. Transcriptomic analyses suggested that perturbations to cell respiration, carbohydrate transport, and stress-response pathways contributed to the antibiotic tolerance in CDI231. Genes associated with hypervirulence and antibiotic resistance were not strongly impacted by drug exposure except for ompW, which was significantly downregulated. Treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae harboring hypervirulence plasmids with ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens may yield a tolerant population due to altered transcription of multiple key pathways.
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic tolerance; Carbapenem-resistant; Hypervirulent; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Transcriptomic

Year:  2022        PMID: 35950190      PMCID: PMC9352398          DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J        ISSN: 2001-0370            Impact factor:   6.155


Introduction

In Western countries, infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae are primarily caused by classical K. pneumoniae (cKP) strains and manifest as opportunistic infections in patients with compromised immunity.[1], [2] cKP strains have demonstrated a proclivity to acquire resistance mechanisms, including carbapenemases, but they are historically not considered hypervirulent.[3], [4] In contrast, hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKP) has been shown to cause metastatic infections among healthy hosts in the community. These infections are associated with mortality rates of up to ∼40% and significant morbidity, including visual and neurological impairment.[5], [6], [7] Virulence in hvKP is primarily attributed to siderophore production and increased capsule polysaccharide (CPS).[8] Although infections caused by hvKP are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, these strains have historically retained high rates of susceptibility to antibiotics.[9], [10]. Carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) is an evolving pathotype of imminent threat to public health [9]. CR-hvKP is particularly problematic since it combines the ability to cause life-threatening infections within healthy hosts with resistance to a majority of the β-lactam antibiotics. Unfortunately, CR-hvKP has now been identified in countries around the world, elevating the need for the development infection control and antimicrobial treatment strategies.[11], [12], [13], [14] Although a number of studies have evaluated antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant cKP, there are no prospective clinical studies and limited in vitro studies evaluating the efficacy of antimicrobials against hvKP or CR-hvKP.[15], [16], [17] Based on the poor clinical outcomes after hvKP infections and in vitro data that suggest that antimicrobials can modulate CPS synthesis, it is possible that the CPS produced by hvKP strains affects the pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents.[18], [19], [20], [21] With only a few remaining antibiotics active against CR-hvKP, novel approaches urgently need to be defined.[22] The objective of this study was to identify active antibiotic regimens against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae with hypervirulence plasmids and evaluate the bacterial transcriptomic response to therapy.

Methods

Bacterial strains and whole genome sequencing

Two representative carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates with hypervirulence genes obtained from East Asia (CDI694) and the Middle East (CDI231) were used in this study (Table 1). These isolates are representative of the CR-hvKP strains that have emerged in patients, which have plasmids with hypervirulence and multidrug-resistance genes. They were also chosen based on their carbapenemase genes. One isolate with blaKPC (CDI694) and one isolate with blaNDM and blaOXA-48 (CDI231) were selected. Hypervirulence was defined by the presence of the plasmid-borne rmpA/rmpA2 (regulator of the mucoid phenotype A) and iut (aerobactin) genes.[2], [8] Whole-genome sequencing was performed using a combination of the Illumina Hiseq platform and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION sequencing. Briefly, DNA was isolated from overnight cultures using a MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit as recommended by the manufacturer (Epicentre, USA). Illumina libraries were prepared for sequencing using NexteraXT kits and sequenced on a HiSeq platform with paired 150-base sequence reads. Nanopore libraries were prepared using Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-RBK109) and loaded onto an R9.4 flow cell and the run was performed on MinION Mk1B device. Hybrid assembly was conducted using Unicycler v0.4.9. with the default settings.[23] MICs were determined by broth microdilution in triplicate according to CLSI guidelines (Table 1).[24].
Table 1

MICs of the CR-hvKP isolates.

IsolateMICs (mg/L)
ATMATM/CAZ/AVICAZ/AVICAZMEMMINPMBRIF
CDI694>64≤0.5/8/44/4>6412880.2516
CDI231>64≤0.5/8/4>64/4>641620.2516

ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; MEM, meropenem; MIN, minocycline; PMB, polymyxin B; RIF, rifampin.

MICs of the CR-hvKP isolates. ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; MEM, meropenem; MIN, minocycline; PMB, polymyxin B; RIF, rifampin.

Time-kill assays

Static time-kill assays were performed against a starting inoculum of each isolate at ∼107 cfu/mL, as previously described.[25], [26] Aztreonam (ATM), ceftazidime (CAZ), avibactam (AVI), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MIN), and polymyxin B (PMB) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. On the first day of each experiment, antibiotics were prepared at 50% and 100% of the estimated maximal serum achievable free-drug concentrations (fCmax), except ATM, which was prepared only at 100% fCmax, as it will not be active as monotherapy against these isolates.[27], [28], [29], [30], [31] Combinations with CAZ/AVI (at 50% and 100% fCmax) and another agent (at the highest concentration that was not bactericidal) were then tested to evaluate for synergy. CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM, MEM, MIN, or PMB, was tested against the CDI694 isolate, while CAZ/AVI + ATM alone, and in triple combination with MEM, MIN, or PMB, was tested against CDI231. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB, Becton Dickinson) and exposed to antibiotics for 24 h while being incubated at 37˚C with constant shaking. Viable bacterial cell counts were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h. Bactericidal activity was defined as ≥ 3 log10cfu/mL reduction from the initial inoculum. Synergy was defined as a ≥ 2 log10cfu/mL decrease following exposure to the combination compared with the most active agent alone.

One-compartment Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model experiments

The most active and clinically relevant antibiotic regimens were further investigated in a dynamic one-compartment model to examine the effect of simulated human drug exposures over 48 h, as previously described.[26] Briefly, CAMHB was continuously pumped into sealed central reservoirs. The central reservoirs were threaded 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks modified with a glass port for sampling and fitted with a reservoir cap (FiberCell Systems) that permits inflow of media and antibiotics as well as the simultaneous outflow of waste media. The flow rates in and out of the reservoir were identical to maintain a constant volume of media (105 mL) throughout the experiment. The flow rates were set to simulate the approximate half-lives of CAZ/AVI and ATM expected in patients (∼2 h). The central reservoirs were placed on a multi-point stirrer in a 37 °C incubator with the bacteria at an inoculum of ∼107 cfu/mL. A magnetic stir bar in the reservoirs was used to ensure constant mixing and homogeneity. Antibiotics were infused into the central reservoir via an automated syringe pump (NE-1600; New Era Pumps Systems) to simulate both “sub-therapeutic” (10%) and “average” (100%) human pharmacokinetic exposures. CAZ/AVI (for both strains) was administered to mimic a dose of 2.5 gm every 8 h (“average” regimen fCmax of 75/15 mg/L) and ATM (for CDI231) was administered to mimic a dose of 2 gm every 8 h (“average” regimen fCmax of 75 mg/L).[27], [28] Each antibiotic dose (starting at 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40 h) was infused for a duration of two hours. Viable bacterial cell counts were performed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, and 48 h after the start of drug administration. MICs were determined again for both isolates after 48 h of drug exposure.

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and sequence analysis

To investigate the transcriptomic response in the CR-hvKP isolates that may permit them to persist during antibiotic therapy, RNA-seq was performed following antibiotic exposure in the one-compartment model for CDI231. Bacteria for transcriptomic analyses from control (no drug) and treated (100% CAZ/AVI + 100% ATM) samples were collected at the 48 h time point, flash frozen using liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C until RNA-seq was performed. To identify expression changes associated with persistence, the 48 h samples were used for RNA-seq since the bacteria from this time point were able to grow in the presence of antibiotics without increases in MIC. Total RNAs were extracted using the RNA Mini kit (Qiagen), followed by TURBO™ DNase (Invitrogen) treatment to clear DNA contamination. rRNA depletion was conducted by Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina), and the RNASeq libraries were generated by TruSeq® mRNA Library preparation kits, followed by sequencing in an Illumina NextSeq 500 platform with single end 75 bp reads. RNA-seq was performed in duplicate. The raw reads were filtered by trimmomatic v0.39,[32] and the filtered reads were mapped to the closed reference genome generated hybrid assembly using Bowtie2 v2.4.2 [33]. Read counting at each gene was generated by HTSeq v0.13.5,[34] and differential gene expression analysis was conducted by DESeq2 in R.[35] Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG orthology were predicted by eggnog-mapper v2.1.0 [36] and BlastKOALA v2.2,[37] respectively. The GO and KEGG enrichment was conducted using clusterProfiler in R.[38].

Results

hvKP whole genome sequences

The hybrid assembly using the combination of Illumina and Nanopore sequencing data successfully closed the two genomes of CDI231 and CDI694. They both carried one circular chromosome of 5,344,935 and 5,473,734 bps in length, respectively. They both harbored 5 circular plasmids, ranging from 9.29 to 348.3 kb in CDI231, and 5.6 to 216.6 kb in CDI694. CDI231 belonged to ST377 with KL102 capsular type, while CDI694 was an ST11 strain of KL64 capsular type. In CDI694, blaKPC-2 and blaCTX-M−65 were harbored on an IncFII(pHN7A8)-R plasmid (pCDI694-140.8) of 140,828 bp in length (Fig. S1). CDI694 harbored an IncHIB-FIB pLVPK-like virulence plasmid, pCDI694-216.6, carrying the salmochelin (iro), aerobactin (iuc) gene clusters and the rmpA, rmpA2 (truncated) genes (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Structures of hypervirulent plasmids pLVPK, pCDI694-216.6, pCDI231-348.3 and phvKpST147_NDM1_1659. The virulence genes rmpA/rmpA2, iut, iro appear highlighted in yellow, while antimicrobial resistance genes appear highlighted in red. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Structures of hypervirulent plasmids pLVPK, pCDI694-216.6, pCDI231-348.3 and phvKpST147_NDM1_1659. The virulence genes rmpA/rmpA2, iut, iro appear highlighted in yellow, while antimicrobial resistance genes appear highlighted in red. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) In CDI231, blaOXA-48 is harbored on a 63.6 kb IncL pOXA-48a-like plasmid (pCDI231-63.6), of which blaOXA-48 is located in a Tn1999.2 element (Fig. S1). The sequence of pCDI231-63.6 was identical to a number of plasmids isolated from Switzerland (e.g. CP039947), Russia (e.g. CP063280), Netherlands (e.g. CP068298), India (e.g. CP076010) and Spain (e.g. MT989343) from K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and Citrobacter freundii. The blaNDM-1 gene was carried on a large 348.3 Kb IncHIB-FIB plasmid, pCDI231-348.3, which showed >99% query coverage and >99.9% sequence identities to plasmid p51015_NDM_1 (CP050380) and phvKpST147_NDM1_1659 (CP072810) from Czech Republic and Russia, respectively (Fig. 1). blaNDM-1 was located in a ∼47 kb region, co-harboring aph(3′)-la, aph(3′)-VI, armA, mph(A), mph(E), msr(E), qnrS1, sul1, sul2, and dfrA5 genes, and conferring resistance to some aminoglycosides, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides and trimethoprim. pCDI231-348.3 also carry the virulence genes rmpA, rmpA2 (truncated) and aerobactin encoding gene clusters (iuc) (Fig. 1). In the time-kill assays, the only bactericidal monotherapy was CAZ/AVI against CDI694, which caused 3.2 and 3.7 log10cfu/mL reductions at the 50% and 100% fCmax concentrations, respectively (Fig. 2A). At 24 h, all other monotherapies against CDI694 and each monotherapy against CDI231 had viable counts near growth control (i.e. no reduction at 24 h) (Fig. 2C). While not bactericidal, PMB monotherapy did initially result in a >2 log10cfu/mL bacterial reduction at 8 h against both isolates but was followed by subsequent regrowth. No combinations with CAZ/AVI were synergistic against CDI694 (Fig. 2B), while combinations with CAZ/AVI + ATM were found to be synergistic against CDI231 (Fig. 2D). Against CDI231, CAZ/AVI + ATM combinations led to decreases of 2.4 (CAZ/AVI 50% fCmax) and 3.4 (CAZ/AVI 100% fCmax) log10cfu/mL. Triple combination therapy with CAZ/AVI + ATM + PMB resulted in bacterial reductions of 4.4 (CAZ/AVI 50% fCmax) and 4.5 (CAZ/AVI 100% fCmax) log10cfu/mL against CDI231.
Fig. 2

Bacterial killing by monotherapy and combination therapy in time-kill experiments against CDI694 (A and B) and CDI231 (C and D).

Bacterial killing by monotherapy and combination therapy in time-kill experiments against CDI694 (A and B) and CDI231 (C and D).

One-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

In the one-compartment model, the 10% and 100% CAZ/AVI 2.5 gm q8h regimens alone against CDI694 showed initial killing at 6 h of 2.6 and 3.0 log10cfu/mL, respectively (Fig. 3A). However, initial killing was not sustained, and regrowth occurred at 48 h with the 10% regimen, while the 100% regimen was approximately static from 6 to 48 h. Only a 1 dilution increase in CAZ/AVI MIC was observed for CDI694 after 48 h of treatment (Table 2). Against CDI231, initial killing of ∼2–3 log10cfu/mL caused by the CAZ/AVI 2.5 gm q8h + ATM 2 gm q8h regimens was sustained through 26 h (Fig. 3B). Regrowth was observed for the 10% regimen by 48 h whereas the 100% regimen yielded a final reduction of 1.74 log10cfu/mL. Similar to CDI694, no increase in MIC was observed in CDI231 after 48 h of treatment (Table 2).
Fig. 3

Pharmacodynamic activity of CAZ/AVI against CDI694 (A) and CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM against CDI231 (B) in the one-compartment model.

Table 2

MICs of CR-hvKP isolates after 48 h antibiotic exposures in the one-compartment model.

IsolateDrug RegimenMICs
ATMATM/CAZ/AVICAZ/AVI
CDI694 (Post-Exposure)Growth Control>64≤0.5/8/41/4
100% CAZ/AVI>64≤0.5/8/42/4
10% CAZ/AVI>64≤0.5/8/42/4



CDI231 (Post-Exposure)Growth Control>64≤0.5/8/4>64/4
100% CAZ/AVI + ATM>64≤0.5/8/4>64/4
10% CAZ/AVI + ATM>64≤0.5/8/4>64/4

ATM, aztreonam; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam.

Pharmacodynamic activity of CAZ/AVI against CDI694 (A) and CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM against CDI231 (B) in the one-compartment model. MICs of CR-hvKP isolates after 48 h antibiotic exposures in the one-compartment model. ATM, aztreonam; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam.

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq)

Despite achieving antibiotic concentrations in excess of the MIC, the drug regimens failed to eradicate either hvKP isolate in the one-compartment model. After drug exposure, there were no changes to the MIC suggesting the isolates could sustain growth in the presence of antibiotic through mechanism(s) other than resistance development. To study this persistence, we performed RNA-seq to assess the transcriptomic response of CDI231 to CAZ/AVI and ATM (100% doses).

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

There were a total of 513 DEGs that had a log2 fold change of  >2 or <−2 with a false discovery rate of <0.01 in CDI231 exposed to CAZ/AVI and ATM for 48 h. Among these, 431 genes were downregulated and 82 were upregulated (Fig. 4A). GO enrichment analysis showed that the genes most significantly perturbed by antibiotic exposure in CDI231 were related to: 1) generation of energy/respiration, 2) carbohydrate transport, 3) stress response, 4) detoxification/antioxidant activity, 5) threonine/cofactor catabolism, and 6) cell metabolism (Fig. 4B and C). There were 64 unique DEGs related to the generation of energy/respiration GO terms; 56 were downregulated and 8 upregulated. Within this group, the genes (product) that displayed the greatest change in expression were tdcD (propionate kinase), katG (catalase peroxidase), ahpF (alkyl hydroperoxide reductase), and frdA (fumarate reductase flavoprotein subunit) with −6.63, −5.84, −5.56, and −5.36 log2 fold change compared to non-antibiotic exposed bacteria, respectively. In addition to frdA, the whole fumarate reductase operon (frdABCD), which encodes an enzyme that converts fumurate to succinate, was downregulated upon antibiotic exposure as were fumA and fumB. The fumA and fumB genes encode fumarase enzymes that are involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and catalyze the reversible conversion of fumarate to malate. Genes encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase that act under anaerobic (glpABC) and aerobic (glpD) conditions were significantly downregulated (−3.00 to −3.50 log2 fold) and upregulated (2.86 log2 fold), respectively.
Fig. 4

RNAseq analysis of CDI231 following exposure to CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM for 48 h. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (A). Barplot of gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (B). Interaction networks between top 30 enriched GOs (C).

RNAseq analysis of CDI231 following exposure to CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM for 48 h. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (A). Barplot of gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (B). Interaction networks between top 30 enriched GOs (C). There were 22 DEGs related to carbohydrate transport; 21 were downregulated and 1 was upregulated. Among genes related to carbohydrate transport, the genes (product) that displayed the greatest change in expression were lamB (maltoporin), malE (maltose-binding periplasmic protein), and malK (maltose/maltodextrin import ATP-binding protein) with −5.57, −5.24, and −4.42 log2 fold change compared to non-antibiotic exposed bacteria, respectively. The malE and malK genes encode portions of the ABC maltose transporter; the other two subunits of this transporter (malF and malG) were also significantly repressed following antibiotic exposure. Genes related to the quorum sensing autoinducer 2 (AI-2) ATP-binding cassette transporter system were also found to have decreased expression (lsrABCD). Further, the manXYZ operon, which encodes three proteins that form the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase (PTS) system that transports mannose, was also significantly downregulated. Various stress response genes were also perturbed following exposure to CAZ/AVI and ATM. There were 66 DEGs related to stress response; 61 were downregulated and 5 were upregulated. Within stress response genes, seven displayed <−5 log2 fold change compared to non-antibiotic exposed bacteria including katG, dps (DNA protection during starvation protein), lamB, ychH (stress-induced protein), frdA, malE, btsT (pyruvate/proton symporter), and cstA (carbon starvation protein A). Most H2O2-scavenger encoding genes were not upregulated and, in fact, many were significantly downregulated (ahpC, ahpF, katE, and katG). Superoxide dismutase genes, which encode for enzymes that convert superoxide radicals to oxygen and H2O2, were both up- (sodA) and down- (sodB, sodC) regulated. Another notable stress response gene, rpoS, was also downregulated but did not meet the <−2 log2 fold change threshold while the DNA repair gene recA was not differentially expressed.

Differentially expressed hypervirulence and β-lactam resistance genes

Since these isolates were multidrug-resistant and hypervirulent, we also specifically looked at the transcription of genes previously described to be associated with these phenotypes. For these genes, DEGs were defined as having a log2 fold change of >1 or <−1 with a false discovery rate of <0.05. Following exposure to CAZ/AVI and ATM, 5 DEGs in CDI231 that may be associated with hypervirulence were identified (Table 3). Three of these genes (peg-589, rmpA, and galF) were down-regulated while two were upregulated (iucB and iucD). There were 4 DEGs that have previously been linked with β-lactam resistance including 2 β-lactamase genes (2 other β-lactamase genes were not differentially expressed) and 2 relating to drug permeability (Table 3). The β-lactamases were down-regulated as were both outer membrane protein DEGs. One of these outer membrane protein genes (ompW) had a log2 fold change of <−6.0.
Table 3

Differentially expressed hypervirulence or β-lactam-resistance genes in CDI231 following exposure to CAZ/AVI and ATM in the one-compartment model. A log2 fold change cutoff of <  − 1 or > 1 with a false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P value of < 0.05 was applied.

Differentially Expressed GeneGene ProductLocus Taglog2 Fold-Change
Genes Associated with Hypervirulence 1galFcps region; UTP--glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferaseKUM55_RS08335−1.45
rmpAregulator of mucoid phenotype AKUM55_RS28055−1.54
peg-589putative carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase familyKUM55_RS28210−1.32
iucBN(6)-hydroxylysine O-acetyltransferase IucBKUM55_RS281751.13
iucDNADPH-dependent L-lysine N(6)-monooxygenaseKUM55_RS281851.12



Genes Associated with β-lactam-Resistance 2blaSHV-110β-lactamase SHV-110KUM55_RS13745−2.44
blaOXA-48β-lactamase OXA-48KUM55_RS26355−1.05
ompK36Outer membrane porin OmpK36KUM55_RS07720−1.18
ompWOuter membrane protein WKUM55_RS15220−6.74

Other hypervirulence associated genes that did not display significant differences in expression include: iucA, dltA, terB, peg-344, and other genes in the cps coding region (KUM55_RS08335-KUM55_RS08420).

Other β-lactam-resistance and permeability associated genes that did not display significant differences in expression include: blaNDM, blaOXA-1, ompK26, ompK35, ompK37, lamB_2, lamB_3, ompX, oprM, tolC, phoE.

Differentially expressed hypervirulence or β-lactam-resistance genes in CDI231 following exposure to CAZ/AVI and ATM in the one-compartment model. A log2 fold change cutoff of <  − 1 or > 1 with a false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P value of < 0.05 was applied. Other hypervirulence associated genes that did not display significant differences in expression include: iucA, dltA, terB, peg-344, and other genes in the cps coding region (KUM55_RS08335-KUM55_RS08420). Other β-lactam-resistance and permeability associated genes that did not display significant differences in expression include: blaNDM, blaOXA-1, ompK26, ompK35, ompK37, lamB_2, lamB_3, ompX, oprM, tolC, phoE.

Discussion

The evolutionary merge of the hypervirulent phenotype with a variety of antibiotic resistance mechanisms within K. pneumoniae holds the potential to cause widespread devastating and untreatable disease.[22] The most common CR-hvKP in China is currently the KPC-2-producing K64-ST11 strain, though isolates harboring other carbapenemases, including metallo- and OXA-type β-lactamases, have also been identified worldwide.[11], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] Despite increasing prevalence, limited data are available to guide treatment of CR-hvKP infections. The present study showed that CAZ/AVI and CAZ/AVI + ATM were active against CDI694 and CDI231, respectively. However, these regimens failed to eradicate either of the isolates. Transcriptomic analysis identified genes in multiple pathways that were perturbed following antibiotic exposure such as generation of energy/respiration, carbohydrate transport, and stress response, suggesting they may contribute to antibiotic tolerance in CR-hvKP. Against CDI694 (harbors blaKPC-2), CAZ/AVI was bactericidal in the time-kill assays, but no synergy was detected with other antibiotics. Using MIC testing, we previously showed that CAZ/AVI remains highly active against KPC-producing CR-hvKP isolates.[15], [44] However, to our knowledge this is the first in vitro study to further investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of CAZ/AVI-based regimens against CR-KP isolates with clearly defined hypervirulence genes. Interestingly, we observed somewhat limited bacterial killing by CAZ/AVI in the dynamic one-compartment PK/PD model (∼2 log10cfu/mL reduction was observed at 48 h). Some previous studies against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates in dynamic PK/PD models showed more killing than we observed in the present study (>5 log10cfu/mL killing by 48 h),[45], [46] while our previous data suggest inter-isolate variations in the rate of killing exist (between 2.5 and 5 log10cfu/mL killing by 48 h).[47] However, isolates from the previous in vitro studies were from ST258, were not identified as hypervirulent, and they had lower MICs to CAZ/AVI ranging from 0.125/4 to 0.5/4mg/L (MICs in present study, 4/4mg/L). Against CDI231 (harbors blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1), the time-kill assays showed that no monotherapies were bactericidal and combinations with CAZ/AVI + ATM were synergistic. Previous time-kill studies also detected synergy between CAZ/AVI + ATM against non-hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strains that harbored NDM-1 and/or OXA.[48], [49] Similar to the response of CDI694 to CAZ/AVI, CDI231 persisted despite exposure to CAZ/AVI + ATM in the one-compartment model. In contrast, a previous study by Lodise et al using the hollow fiber infection model showed more rapid bacterial killing for CAZ/AVI + ATM against a non-hypervirulent K. pneumoniae with blaNDM-1 (ATM/CAZ/AVI MIC = 2/8/4mg/L).[50] However, like our study, Lodise et al also found that CAZ/AVI + ATM against an Escherichia coli isolate with blaNDM-1 (ATM/CAZ/AVI MIC = 4/8/4mg/L) failed to demonstrate bactericidal activity through 168 h. Since both isolates in the study by Lodise et al had MICs that varied by only 1 dilution and the MIC to ATM/CAZ/AVI for CDI231 was ≤ 0.5/8/4mg/L, MIC differences alone are not likely to explain the variations in pharmacodynamic response to CAZ/AVI + ATM. Interestingly, the failure of CAZ/AVI-based regimens to eradicate the CR-hvKP isolates was not caused by the development of a stable resistant population. CR-hvKP isolates did not display increased MICs following antibiotic exposure. Thus, the transcriptomic response of CDI231 was evaluated to help identify potential mechanisms the isolate used to persist during CAZ/AVI + ATM therapy. One notable outer membrane porin, ompW, was significantly downregulated. Although β-lactams primarily enter K. pneumoniae through ompK35 and ompK36, altered expression of OmpW has been detected during antibiotic-exposure, including to β-lactams.[51], [52] However, it is not likely that this porin directly permits passage of ceftazidime or aztreonam,[53] so its role in antibiotic tolerance may be indirect in the present study. Decreased expression of some β-lactamase genes (blaSHV-110 and blaOXA-48) after 48 h of antibiotic exposure were noted and may also suggest that CDI231 was able to adapt to repel antibiotic penetration. However, other β-lactamase genes (blaNDM and blaOXA-1) were not differentially expressed. Various genes that are involved in the cellular respiration and energy pathways were also downregulated in CDI231 during antibiotic exposure, suggesting a relationship between cell respiration and antibiotic tolerance. Low et al also found a suppression of genes involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle in NDM-producing K. pneumoniae following exposure to β-lactams.[54] Decreased metabolic activity in cells has been linked to the formation of bacterial persisters, which can be antibiotic tolerant.[55] One series of genes that were perturbed in CDI231 was the frdABCD operon, which encodes a fumarate reductase enzyme that is part of the anaerobic respiration pathway that converts fumarate to succinate. The downregulation of fumarases encoded by fumA and fumB also suggest that fumarate is important for antibiotic tolerance in this K. pneumoniae isolate. The frdABCD operon was downregulated with antibiotic exposure in the CDI231 cells and may have led to accumulation of fumarate. Previously, Kim et al showed that fumarate accumulation in E. coli led to ampicillin and norfloxacin tolerance.[56] However, in contrast to the present study, they also showed that overexpression of frd, particularly in the presence of exogenous fumarate, further potentiated antibiotic tolerance in E. coli by using fumarate as a terminal electron acceptor in anaerobic respiration. It is possible that in K. pneumoniae CDI231, fumarate accumulation instead facilitated antibiotic tolerance by depleting intracellular glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) concentrations through the activation of the anaerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.[57] Decreased G3P may increase persistence and prevent bacteria from resuscitating to a metabolically active (and more sensitive) growth state.[58] Furthermore, the aerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (glpD), which encodes an enzyme that metabolizes the conversion of G3P to the glycolysis metabolite dihydroxyacetone phosphate, was upregulated in CDI231 during antibiotic exposure and may also lead to decreased intracellular G3P. Upregulation of glpD has previously been identified in E. coli persisters that were tolerant to ampicillin and ofloxacin.[58], [59] Taken together, antibiotic tolerance may in part be due to a decrease in the intracellular concentration of G3P that occurs through multiple pathways. There was also a consistent pattern of decreased expression of genes encoding carbohydrate transport proteins. For example, the lamB gene encoding maltoporin was significantly downregulated. LamB functions to import maltose and maltodextrins. Reduced expression of this protein has been observed in tetracycline- and fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, which may be due to reduced penetration of these antibiotics directly through this porin.[60], [61] Reduced expression of LamB has also been observed following exposure to colistin.[62] However, it has been shown that LamB does not permit significant penetration of the β-lactams to the bacterial periplasm in K. pneumoniae.[63] Thus, LamB’s decreased expression in CDI231 in the present study may be a general bacterial defense to antibiotic exposure. Similarly, the expression of other genes involved in carbohydrate transport, such as malE, malF, malG, malK, and manXYZ, were depressed following antibiotic exposure. Further studies are required to determine if these alterations directly contribute to resistance in K. pneumoniae. The expression of bacterial stress response genes in CDI231 were generally downregulated in the presence of antibiotics. Indeed, it has been suggested that antibiotic exposure by bactericidal antibiotics, such as the β-lactams, can induce redox stress through reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2, though this remains controversial.[64] Interestingly, most H2O2-scavenger encoding genes were significantly downregulated (ahpC, ahpF, katE, and katG) compared to the unexposed control. Some previous studies have found that the catalase-peroxidase katG was upregulated with antibiotic exposure[65] while others have shown that it was downregulated or unaffected.[64], [66] It remains unclear why the H2O2-scavenger encoding genes were downregulated but it is possible that bacterial cells displaying higher H2O2 levels displayed increased persistence, as has been observed in E. coli.[67] Additional bacterial stress and cold/heat shock responses were also downregulated following 48 h of antibiotic exposure. Many studies have found that the stress response genes are activated following antibiotic exposure,[68] although it may also depend on the duration of antibiotic exposure. For example, an NDM-producing K. pneumoniae isolate exposed to chloramphenicol initially upregulated some stress response genes but they were significantly downregulated by 4 h.[69] Thus, in the present study, where the transcriptomic response was evaluated after 48 h, it is possible that the need for a stress response diminishes as the cells become quiescent. One notable limitation of this study is that the definition of hypervirulence was based on the bacterial genotype. Future animal experiments are required to validate the hypervirulence phenotype in these isolates. However, the genetic biomarkers for hypervirulence used in this study are generally effective to differentiate hvKP from cKP.[2] Another limitation was that RNA-seq was only performed on samples exposed to antibiotics for 48 h. It is likely that the transcriptomic response varies over time. In summary, CAZ/AVI-based regimens were active against CR-KP isolates with hypervirulence genes but failed to eradicate either isolate by 48 h. Synergy was not observed for any antibiotic in combination with CAZ/AVI for CDI694, while synergy between CAZ/AVI + ATM was detected against CDI231. Transcriptomic analyses suggested that perturbations to multiple pathways, including cell respiration, carbohydrate transport, and stress response, may have enabled CDI231 to survive despite β-lactam concentrations well above the MIC. Furthermore, expression of genes associated with hypervirulence and antibiotic resistance were generally not strongly impacted by drug exposure with the exception of ompW, which was significantly downregulated. Elucidation of mechanisms that cause antibiotic tolerance may lead to optimized antibiotic combinations that can suppress these adaptations. Additional studies are warranted that can elucidate antibiotic regimens capable of extensive bacterial killing against CR-hvKP to combat this emerging threat.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  66 in total

1.  Ciprofloxacin treatment failure in a murine model of pyelonephritis due to an AAC(6')-Ib-cr-producing Escherichia coli strain susceptible to ciprofloxacin in vitro.

Authors:  T Guillard; E Cambau; F Chau; L Massias; C de Champs; B Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality.

Authors:  Daniel J Dwyer; Peter A Belenky; Jason H Yang; I Cody MacDonald; Jeffrey D Martell; Noriko Takahashi; Clement T Y Chan; Michael A Lobritz; Dana Braff; Eric G Schwarz; Jonathan D Ye; Mekhala Pati; Maarten Vercruysse; Paul S Ralifo; Kyle R Allison; Ahmad S Khalil; Alice Y Ting; Graham C Walker; James J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Risk factors and clinical outcomes of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae induced bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Jiayang Li; Jianan Ren; Weiping Wang; Gefei Wang; Guosheng Gu; Xiuwen Wu; Ying Wang; Mei Huang; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Can Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam Overcome β-Lactam Resistance Conferred by Metallo-β-Lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae?

Authors:  Steven Marshall; Andrea M Hujer; Laura J Rojas; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Romney M Humphries; Brad Spellberg; Kristine M Hujer; Emma K Marshall; Susan D Rudin; Federico Perez; Brigid M Wilson; Ronald B Wasserman; Linda Chikowski; David L Paterson; Alejandro J Vila; David van Duin; Barry N Kreiswirth; Henry F Chambers; Vance G Fowler; Michael R Jacobs; Mark E Pulse; William J Weiss; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates.

Authors:  Fangyou Yu; Jingnan Lv; Siqiang Niu; Hong Du; Yi-Wei Tang; Robert A Bonomo; Barry N Kreiswirth; Liang Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Elucidating the survival and response of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae after exposure to imipenem at sub-lethal concentrations.

Authors:  Ye Mun Low; Chun Wie Chong; Ivan Kok Seng Yap; Lay Ching Chai; Stuart C Clarke; Sasheela Ponnampalavanar; Kartini Abdul Jabar; Mohd Yasim Md Yusof; Cindy Shuan Ju Teh
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Comparative proteomics of inner membrane fraction from carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with a reference strain.

Authors:  Vishvanath Tiwari; Jitendraa Vashistt; Arti Kapil; Rajeswari R Moganty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Whole genome sequence revealed the fine transmission map of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia isolates within a nosocomial outbreak.

Authors:  Wenjun Sui; Haijian Zhou; Pengcheng Du; Lijun Wang; Tian Qin; Mei Wang; Hongyu Ren; Yanfei Huang; Jing Hou; Chen Chen; Xinxin Lu
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  Generating Genotype-Specific Aminoglycoside Combinations with Ceftazidime/Avibactam for KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Yanqin Huang; Karol Sokolowski; Amisha Rana; Nidhi Singh; Jiping Wang; Ke Chen; Yinzhi Lang; Jieqiang Zhou; Neera Kadiyala; Fiorella Krapp; Egon A Ozer; Alan R Hauser; Jian Li; Jürgen B Bulitta; Zackery P Bulman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.