| Literature DB >> 35946162 |
Ksenia G Kuznetsova1, Sofia S Zvonareva2, Rustam Ziganshin3, Elena S Mekhova2, Polina Dgebuadze2, Dinh T H Yen4, Thanh H T Nguyen4, Sergei A Moshkovskii1,5, Alexander E Fedosov2.
Abstract
Venoms of predatory marine cone snails are intensely studied because of the biomedical applications of the neuropeptides that they contain, termed conotoxins. Meanwhile some gastropod lineages have independently acquired secretory glands strikingly similar to the venom gland of cone snails, suggesting that they possess similar venoms. Here we focus on the most diversified of these clades, the genus Vexillum. Based on the analysis of a multi-species proteo-transcriptomic dataset, we show that Vexillum species indeed produce complex venoms dominated by highly diversified short cysteine-rich peptides, vexitoxins. Vexitoxins possess the same precursor organization, display overlapping cysteine frameworks and share several common post-translational modifications with conotoxins. Some vexitoxins show sequence similarity to conotoxins and adopt similar domain conformations, including a pharmacologically relevant inhibitory cysteine knot motif. The Vexillum envenomation gland (gL) is a notably more recent evolutionary novelty than the conoidean venom gland. Thus, we hypothesize lower divergence between vexitoxin genes, and their ancestral 'somatic' counterparts compared to that in conotoxins, and we find support for this hypothesis in the evolution of the vexitoxin cluster V027. We use this example to discuss how future studies on vexitoxins can inform the origin of conotoxins, and how they may help to address outstanding questions in venom evolution.Entities:
Keywords: Gastropoda; Mollusca; ion channel; molecular adaptation; toxin; venom evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35946162 PMCID: PMC9363990 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.530
Figure 1Phylogeny and morphology of Vexillum. (a) Mitochondrial phylogeny of the Neogastropoda [19]; the family Costellariidae is represented by Costapex baldwinae. (b) Life specimen of Vexillum crocatum (photo courtesy of Janette Johnson). (c) Life specimen of Vexillum coccineum (photo courtesy of Janette Johnson). (d) Foregut anatomy of Vexillum vulpecula; sg shown in blue, gL in green. (e) Species tree of the four Vexillum species analysed herein based on the ML analysis of concatenated aa sequences of 426 BUSCO loci (126 681 aa sites). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2Major classes of the annotated Vexillum transcripts. (a) Proportions of annotated and unannotated transcripts in Vexillum coccineum (left) and V. vulpecula (right). (b,c) Ten most diversified classes of annotated transcripts in (b) salivary gland (sg) and (c) gland of Leiblein (gL); pink (left)—Vexillum coccineum, yellow (right)—V. vulpecula. (d) Heatmap of log10-transformed summed TPM expression levels of 30 most highly expressed annotated transcript classes per dataset. On the right heatmap of the cluster support in proteomic data: three cells in a horizontal row correspond to three CDS of a cluster best represented in our proteomic data. (e–g) SMART structure of multi-ShK transcripts: (e) Vc0003648, (f) Vc0000412 and (g) Vc0000028. (h) Superposition of the ShKT-like domain Vc0000412-1 (beige) and Stichodactyla helianthus K channel toxin (d1beia). (i) Superposition of the ShKT-like domain Vv0001739-1 (beige) and crisp-3 member Natrin of Naja atra (d2giza2). (j,k) SMART structures of highly expressed multi-domain sg transcripts: (j) astacin Vv0000203, 14Vvsg:TPM-16763.81; (k) CAP Vc0000374 8Vcsg: TPM-4360.1, 9Vcsg:TPM-5528.32. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3Expression and structural features of the unannotated Vexillum transcript clusters. (a) Heatmap of log10-transformed expression of 118 unannotated transcripts clusters in sg and gL transcriptomes of Vexillum coccineum and V. vulpecula. Column pr—support of clusters in proteomic data (markup like in figure 2). Column Cys: grey marks the presence of a conserved Cys-framework across most cluster's, sequences. Columns p1–p3—prediction of three PTMs common in conotoxins: p1—N-terminal pyroglutamate, p2—carboxy-glutamate, p3—C-terminal amidation. (b) Most common Cys-frameworks in unannotated clusters of putative Vexillum toxins. (c–e) Mature peptide alignment in three clusters of vexitoxins with closest conotoxin matches; (c) Cluster V041, (d) V117 and (e) V027. (f) Superposition of the vexitoxin Vc0001332 versus ρ-conotoxin TIA. (g) Superposition of the vexitoxin Vc0004145 versus conotoxin GS. (h) three-dimensional structure of the vexitoxin Vv0000573. (i) Heatmap of log10-transformed expression levels of seven key PTM enzymes in Vexillum coccineum and V. vulpecula. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 4Precursor structure and evolution of the cluster V027 sequences in Vexillum. (a) Precursor structures in V027. Top—long orthogroup, Vr0003450; middle—long orthogroup, Vc0001640; bottom—short orthogroup, Vv0000573. (b) Codons under negative selection (red, above grey lines), pervasive positive selection or episodic diversifying selection (green, below grey lines). (Online version in colour.)