Literature DB >> 35945690

The state of anesthesia in South Korea: a national survey of the status of anesthetic service activity in 2014-2016.

Eun-Su Choi1, Hee-Won Jung1, Woon Young Kim1, Jae Hwan Kim1, Yoon-Sook Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because the quality of anesthesia affects the surgical outcome, the aim of this study was to investigate the current status of anesthetic services performed by anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists in South Korea from 2014 to 2016 and to compare the results with data from 2011 to 2013.
METHODS: The claimed anesthesia services at medical institutions with employed anesthesiologists and the claims for an invitation fee for an anesthesiologist at medical institutions without employed anesthesiologists were regarded as anesthetic services performed by an anesthesiologist. From 2014 to 2016, the employment of anesthesiologists according to the type of medical institution, the status of anesthetic services according to the presence or absence of employed anesthesiologists, and status of anesthetic services at medical institutions without employed anesthesiologists were analyzed.
RESULTS: The proportion of medical institutions that employed anesthesiologists slightly increased from 27.8% in 2014 to 28.8% in 2016. General anesthesia was more concentrated at higher medical institutions, and most anesthesias were performed by an anesthesiologist. The proportion of spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, and brachial plexus performed by non-anesthesiologists was 11%, 15%, and 16.5%, respectively. Intravenous anesthesia performed by non-anesthesiologists was 58% and has increased compared to the past.
CONCLUSIONS: The employment of anesthesiologists has increased with time, and general anesthesiology was mostly performed by anesthesiologists. However, since the proportion of anesthetic services performed by non-anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia was maintained high, it is necessary to find ways to expand the safety of anesthetic services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Anesthesiologist; Health; Insurance; Non-anesthesiologists; Patient safety; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35945690      PMCID: PMC9539418          DOI: 10.4097/kja.22286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


  21 in total

1.  Learning manual skills in spinal anesthesia and orotracheal intubation: is there any recommended number of cases for anesthesia residency training program?

Authors:  S Charuluxananan; O Kyokong; W Somboonviboon; S Pothimamaka
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2001-06

2.  Learning curves for bag-and-mask ventilation and orotracheal intubation: an application of the cumulative sum method.

Authors:  Ryu Komatsu; Yusuke Kasuya; Hisanori Yogo; Daniel I Sessler; Edward Mascha; Dongsheng Yang; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effectiveness and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy during a specific sedation training program for non-anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Rafael Cabadas Avión; Aurora Baluja; María Ojea Cendón; María Sonsoles Leal Ruiloba; Santiago Vázquez López; Marcial Rey Martínez; Pilar Magdalena López; Julián Álvarez-Escudero
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study.

Authors:  Georges L Savoldelli; Eduardo Schiffer; Christoph Abegg; Vincent Baeriswyl; François Clergue; Jean-Luc Waeber
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Simulation Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiao Xu Chen; Vatsal Trivedi; AbdulHadi A AlSaflan; Suzanne Clare Todd; Andrea C Tricco; Colin J L McCartney; Sylvain Boet
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Azriel Perel
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Viju P Deenadayalu; Emely Eid; Thomas F Imperiale; John A Walker; Kuldip Sandhu; Anthony C Clarke; Lybus C Hillman; Akira Horiuchi; Lawrence B Cohen; Ludwig T Heuss; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; James A Sinnott; Thomas Welton; Magdy Rofail; Iyad Subei; Rodger Sleven; Paul Jordan; John Goff; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Harold Munnings; Martin Tagle; Brian W Sipe; Till Wehrmann; Jack A Di Palma; Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Riphaus; Stephen T Amann; Gen Tohda; Timothy McClellan; Charles Thueson; John Morse; Nizam Meah
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effect of paramedic experience on orotracheal intubation success rates.

Authors:  Alex G Garza; Matthew C Gratton; Darryl Coontz; Elizabeth Noble; O John Ma
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Analysis of anesthesia-related medical disputes in the 2009-2014 period using the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists database.

Authors:  Woon-Seok Roh; Duk-Kyung Kim; Young-Hun Jeon; Seong-Hyop Kim; Seung-Cheol Lee; Young-Kwon Ko; Yong-Cheol Lee; Gyu-Hong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  The State of Anesthetic Services in Korea: A National Survey of the Status of Anesthesia Provider in the 2011-2013 Period.

Authors:  Yongsuk Kim; Ji Man Kim; Sang Gyu Lee; Ki-Young Lee; Ki Hyuk Hong; Kook Hyun Lee; Dong Kyu Kim; Sung Jin Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.