BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors determined the success and failure rates for interns learning bag-and-mask ventilation and orotracheal intubation. Their goal was to determine the amount of experience needed to perform these procedures correctly. METHODS: The authors recorded 695 bag-and-mask ventilations and 679 orotracheal intubations performed by 15 inexperienced interns during their 3 month-long anesthesia rotations. Learning curves for each procedure for each intern were constructed with both the standard and risk-adjusted cumulative sum methods. The average number of procedures required to attain a failure rate of 20% was estimated for each technique. RESULTS: Fourteen of 15 interns attained acceptable failure rates at bag-and-mask ventilation after 27 +/- 13 procedures, with a median (95% confidence interval) of 25 (15-32) procedures to cross the decision limit when considering all 15 interns. Nine of 15 interns attained acceptable failure rates at orotracheal intubation after 26 +/- 8 procedures, with a median of 29 (22-not estimable) procedures to cross the limit when considering all interns. The proportion of interns who attained acceptable failure rates for mask ventilation was greater than for tracheal intubation (93% vs. 60%, P = 0.025). Overall, our interns achieved a bag-and-mask ventilation failure rate of 20% or better after a median of 25 procedures; approximately 80% of interns achieved the goal after 35 procedures or less. CONCLUSIONS: Participating interns developed mask ventilation skills faster than orotracheal intubation skills, and there was more variability in the rate at which intubation skills developed. A median of 29 procedures was required to achieve an 80% orotracheal intubation success rate.
BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors determined the success and failure rates for interns learning bag-and-mask ventilation and orotracheal intubation. Their goal was to determine the amount of experience needed to perform these procedures correctly. METHODS: The authors recorded 695 bag-and-mask ventilations and 679 orotracheal intubations performed by 15 inexperienced interns during their 3 month-long anesthesia rotations. Learning curves for each procedure for each intern were constructed with both the standard and risk-adjusted cumulative sum methods. The average number of procedures required to attain a failure rate of 20% was estimated for each technique. RESULTS: Fourteen of 15 interns attained acceptable failure rates at bag-and-mask ventilation after 27 +/- 13 procedures, with a median (95% confidence interval) of 25 (15-32) procedures to cross the decision limit when considering all 15 interns. Nine of 15 interns attained acceptable failure rates at orotracheal intubation after 26 +/- 8 procedures, with a median of 29 (22-not estimable) procedures to cross the limit when considering all interns. The proportion of interns who attained acceptable failure rates for mask ventilation was greater than for tracheal intubation (93% vs. 60%, P = 0.025). Overall, our interns achieved a bag-and-mask ventilation failure rate of 20% or better after a median of 25 procedures; approximately 80% of interns achieved the goal after 35 procedures or less. CONCLUSIONS: Participating interns developed mask ventilation skills faster than orotracheal intubation skills, and there was more variability in the rate at which intubation skills developed. A median of 29 procedures was required to achieve an 80% orotracheal intubation success rate.
Authors: Brian J Linder; Mallika Anand; Amy L Weaver; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; Emanuel C Trabuco; John A Occhino; John B Gebhart Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Aayush Gabrani; Taiki Kojima; Ronald C Sanders; Asha Shenoi; Vicki Montgomery; Simon J Parsons; Sandeep Gangadharan; Sholeen Nett; Natalie Napolitano; Keiko Tarquinio; Dennis W Simon; Anthony Lee; Guillaume Emeriaud; Michelle Adu-Darko; John S Giuliano; Keith Meyer; Ana Lia Graciano; David A Turner; Conrad Krawiec; Adnan M Bakar; Lee A Polikoff; Margaret Parker; Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky; Benjamin Crulli; Paula Vanderford; Ryan K Breuer; Eleanor Gradidge; Aline Branca; Lily B Glater-Welt; David Tellez; Lisa V Wright; Matthew Pinto; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Maki Ishizuka; Vijayeta Rangarajan; Taylor L Sawyer; Natalie Napolitano; Donald L Boyer; Wynne E Morrison; Justin L Lockman; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Lindsay Johnston; Taylor Sawyer; Anne Ades; Ahmed Moussa; Jeanne Zenge; Philipp Jung; Stephen DeMeo; Kristen Glass; Neetu Singh; Alexandra Howlett; Justine Shults; James Barry; Brianna Brei; Elizabeth Foglia; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Neonatology Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.106
Authors: Andrew C McKown; Jonathan D Casey; Derek W Russell; Aaron M Joffe; David R Janz; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-11