Literature DB >> 24792649

Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence.

Stephen A Feig1.   

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have confirmed that screening women age 40 years and older reduces breast cancer mortality by 30% to 50%. Several factors including faster breast cancer growth rates and lower breast cancer incidence among younger women, as well as shorter life expectancy and more comorbid conditions among older women, should also be considered in screening guidelines. Annual screening beginning at age 40 years and continuing with no upper age limit, as long as a woman has a life expectancy of at least 5 years and no significant comorbid conditions, is currently recommended.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit; Controversies; Mammography; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24792649     DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy and Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Assessment of the Breasts of Women Affected by Cancer.

Authors:  Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro; Maíta Marade Oliveira Lima Leite Vaz; Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  The Bigger Picture: Picking the Right Soap Box-Is it Possible to Connect with Different Audience Targets (Practitioners and Patients) from the Same Platform?

Authors:  Mohammed Ali A Abbass; Hari B Keshava; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

5.  Improving Screening Mammography Outcomes Through Comparison With Multiple Prior Mammograms.

Authors:  Jessica H Hayward; Kimberly M Ray; Dorota J Wisner; John Kornak; Weiwen Lin; Bonnie N Joe; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Patient Navigation Can Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes among African American Women in Chicago: Insights from a Modeling Study.

Authors:  Aditya S Khanna; Bryan Brickman; Michael Cronin; Nyahne Q Bergeron; John R Scheel; Joseph Hibdon; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Karriem S Watson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.801

8.  A Hybrid Deep Transfer Learning of CNN-Based LR-PCA for Breast Lesion Diagnosis via Medical Breast Mammograms.

Authors:  Nagwan Abdel Samee; Amel A Alhussan; Vidan Fathi Ghoneim; Ghada Atteia; Reem Alkanhel; Mugahed A Al-Antari; Yasser M Kadah
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Morris; Stephen A Feig; Madeline Drexler; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 10.  Cancer prevention: state of the art and future prospects.

Authors:  I Valle; D Tramalloni; N L Bragazzi
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2015-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.