Literature DB >> 8839544

Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

S W Chang1, K Kerlikowske, A Nápoles-Springer, S F Posner, E A Sickles, E J Pérez-Stable.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether patient race was associated with timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography, a retrospective record review of diagnostic tests for women with abnormal screening mammography from a Northern California mobile van program was conducted.
METHODS: The study included 317 women between the ages of 33 and 85 who were reported to have abnormal screening mammography between July 1993 and May 1994. Measurements included patient demographics, screening mammography interpretation, follow-up diagnostic tests, and dates of diagnostic evaluation.
RESULTS: Women with abnormal screening mammography underwent a wide variety of diagnostic evaluations. Nonwhite women had significantly longer time (median time, 19 days) from date of index abnormal screening mammography to final disposition compared with white women (median time, 12 days). This racial difference was primarily due to the longer interval between index abnormal screening mammography and first diagnostic test (median time, 15 days for nonwhite women versus 7 days for white women, P < 0.001). The difference persisted when adjusting for patient age, family history of breast cancer, report of palpable mass, and income. The racial difference was similarly significant for each nonwhite subgroup (African American, Latina, and Asian) when compared with white women (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for less timely follow-up of abnormal mammography among nonwhite women need to be identified. Delays that may be instigated by the patient or be due to her physician or system of care need to be explored further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839544     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961001)78:7<1395::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-K

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

1.  Defending diversity: affirmative action and medical education.

Authors:  K DeVille
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  Daniel B Stryer; Robin M Weinick; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram. SMPBC diagnostic process workgroup. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; L Kan; S King
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

4.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Time to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991-1995.

Authors:  L S Caplan; D S May; L C Richardson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

8.  Diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities at community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ercilia R Calcano; Cathy D Meade; William J Fulp; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

9.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.