Literature DB >> 35941313

Are morphological and morphometric characteristics of maxillary anterior region and nasopalatine canal related to each other?

Guldane Magat1, Mehmet Akyuz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this article was to clarify the relationship of anterior bone and tooth morphology with NPC. The anatomical features of the NPC region in three dimensions from coronal, axial, and sagittal directions were analyzed using CBCT and the effects of age, gender, sagittal root positions (SRPs) of central teeth, anterior overbite depth (AOD), central incisor (CI)/palatal plane (PP) angle, NPC/PP angle, and collum angles (CA) on NPC were evaluated in a group of the Turkish population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, CBCTs of a total of 330 individuals between the ages of 17 and 82 were evaluated. The effects of SRP, AOD, CI/PP angle, NPC/PP angle and CA on the anatomical features of NPC were examined on the basis of age and gender. Descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Chi-square, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests were used. p values of < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.
RESULTS: While the SRPs, CI/PP angle, NPC/PP angle, CA, and age did not differ statistically according to NPC shape (p > 0.05), NPC shape varied according to gender and AOD (p < 0.05). It was found that cylindrical NPC (32.8%) was more common in females, while conical-shaped NPC (30.7%) was more common in males (p < 0.01). While most conical NPC was detected in individuals with Class I overbite depth, cylindrical NPCs were found in Class II and III individuals (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that gender and AOD are influential factors on NPC shape. While conical-shaped NPC is more common in individuals with bite depth incisal, cylindrical-shaped NPC is more likely to be seen in individuals with middle and cervical thirds.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bite depth; Collum angle; Nasopalatine canal; Root positions of central teeth

Year:  2022        PMID: 35941313     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-022-00647-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.882


  45 in total

1.  Morphologic evaluation of the incisive canal and its proximity to the maxillary central incisors using computed tomography images.

Authors:  Eun-Ae Cho; Sung-Jin Kim; Yoon Jeong Choi; Kyung-Ho Kim; Chooryung J Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  C M Engstrom; G E Loeb; J G Reid; W J Forrest; L Avruch
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Yichen Pan; Si Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth.

Authors:  M L Moss; L Salentijn
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-06

5.  Nasopalatine canal position relative to the maxillary central incisors: a cone beam computed tomography assessment.

Authors:  Pakawat Chatriyanuyoke; Chun-I Lu; Yusuke Suzuki; Jaime L Lozada; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph Y K Kan; Charles J Goodacre
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Classification of the Root Position of the Maxillary Central Incisors and its Clinical Significance in Immediate Implant Placement.

Authors:  Duoling Xu; Zhao Wang; Lei Sun; Zhenyan Lin; Linzi Wan; Yang Li; Xuan Lin; Wei Peng; Zuyan Zhang; Yongbo Gao
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.454

7.  Cone beam computed tomographic-Based retrospective study on newark population for the assessment of distance between incisive canal and maxillary central incisors: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Sonam Khurana; Parv Parasher; Padma Mukherjee; Mel Mupparapu; Priti P Lotlikar; Adriana G Creanga
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

8.  Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of alveolar bone anatomy at the maxillary anterior region in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Zhixuan Zhou; Wu Chen; Ming Shen; Chao Sun; Jun Li; Ning Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2013-11-12

9.  Comparison of distance of upper central incisor root and incisive canal in different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and sex: A retrospective CBCT study.

Authors:  Eliana Dantas Costa; Larissa de Oliveira Reis; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Int Orthod       Date:  2021-07-24

10.  Quantitative analysis of the relationship between maxillary incisors and the incisive canal by cone-beam computed tomography in an adult Japanese population.

Authors:  Tomonari Matsumura; Yuji Ishida; Ayako Kawabe; Takashi Ono
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.