| Literature DB >> 35935828 |
Simin Emamzadeh Yazdi1, Heino Martin Heyman1,2, Gerhard Prinsloo3, Thomas Klimkait4, Jacobus Johannes Marion Meyer1.
Abstract
Several species of the Helichrysum genus have been used ethnobotanically to treat conditions that we today know have been caused by viral infections. Since HIV is a modern disease with no ethnobotanical history, we commenced with a study on the anti-HIV activity of several Helichrysum species. Drug discovery of small molecules from natural resources that is based on the integration of chemical and biological activity by means of metabolomical analyses, enables faster and a more cost-effective path to identify active compounds without the need for a long process of bioassay-guided fractionation. This study used metabolomics to identify anti-HIV compounds as biomarkers from 57 Helichrysum species in a combined study of the chemical and biological data of two previous studies. In the OPLS-DA and hierarchical cluster analyses, anti-HIV activity data was included as a secondary observation, which assisted in the correlation of the phytochemical composition and biological activity of the samples. Clear grouping revealed similarity in chemical composition and bioactivity of the samples. Based on the biological activity of polar extracts, there was a distinct phytochemical difference between active and non-active groups of extracts. This NMR-based metabolomic investigation showed that the chlorogenic acids, compounds with cinnamoyl functional groups, and quinic acid were the most prominent compounds in the Helichrysum species with anti-HIV activity. This study further revealed that the chlorogenic acid type compounds and quinic acid are biomarkers for anti-HIV activity.Entities:
Keywords: Helichrysum; biomarker; chlorogenic acids; human immunodeficiency virus; metabolomics; quinic acid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935828 PMCID: PMC9355245 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.904231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Analysed Helichrysum species and their herbarium voucher numbers and anti-HIV screening results (% inhibition). No activity against HIV-1 was observed for the non-polar extracts at 2.5 μg/ml (Heyman et al., 2015; Yazdi et al., 2019).
| Selected Plants | Abbreviation | PRU | Location and GPS | %Inhibition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voucher No. | 25 μg/ml | 2.5 μg/ml | 25 μg/ml | |||
| Polar | Polar | Non-polar | ||||
|
|
| 121012, 117098 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | CA | CA | CA |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 120986 | Mpumalanga, Amsterdam | 122 | NO | NO |
| 26˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121022 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 85 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117113 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | CA |
| 28˚58′ S, 29˚26′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117112 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | 95 |
| 28˚58′ S, 29˚26′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117101 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | 82 | NA | NA |
| 28˚57′ S, 29˚12′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 120814 | Western Cape, KBG | CA | NO | CA |
| 33˚00′ S, 18˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121537 | Gauteng, Pretoria | CA | NA | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 28˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117111 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | 88 |
| 28˚58′ S, 29˚26′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121002 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 95 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121008 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 126 | NO | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121538 | Gauteng, Pretoria | 124 | NO | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 28˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121005 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | NO | 108 |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121018, 117127 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 115 | NO | 108 |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117097 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | 104 |
| 28°58′ S, 29°26′E | ||||||
|
|
| 121004 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 120 | 103 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 96720 | Eastern Cape, Rhodes | NA | NA | CA |
| 30° 43′ S, 28° 08′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117142 | KwaZulu-Natal, UNR | 70 | NA | 114 |
| 31˚05′ S, 30˚17′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117120 | KwaZulu-Natal, UNR | 75 | NA | 90 |
| 31˚05′ S, 30˚17′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 120813 | Western Cape, KBG | CA | 110 | CA |
| 33˚00′ S, 18˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117122 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 29˚03′ S, 29˚24′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117121 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 29˚03.68′ S, 29˚23.73′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121003 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 92 | NO |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121547 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | CA | 107 | CA |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117099 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 28˚57.82′ S, 29˚12.28′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121025 | Pretoria, PNBG | CA | 97 | 125 |
| 25˚44′ S, 28˚16′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121009 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 108 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121013 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 121 | NO | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117107 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | 84 |
| 28˚56.98′ S, 29˚12.44′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117102 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 28˚57.82′ S, 29˚12.28′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121015 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 133 | NO | 129 |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121017 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | 132 | 121 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121014 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | NO | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121021 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 111 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117669 | KwaZulu-Natal, Greytown | NA | NA | CA |
| 29˚24.35′ S, 30˚54.73′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117104 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | 120 | NO | CA |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117106 | Gauteng, Pretoria | NA | NA | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 28˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121019 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 100 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117096 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | NA | NA | 112 |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117670 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | 102 | NA | CA |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117108 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | NA | NA | 96 |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117662 | KwaZulu-Natal, New Hanover | NA | NA | NA |
| 29˚21′ S, 30˚32′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117144 | KwaZulu-Natal, Ken Gaze`s Farm | NA | NA | NA |
| 31˚05.27′ S, 30˚17.90′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121536 | Western Cape | CA | 114 | CA |
| 33˚55′ S, 18° 51′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121535 | Western Cape | CA | NO | CA |
| 33˚55′ S, 18° 51′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117110 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | NA | NA | 109 |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121011 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 118 | 100 |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121016 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | NO | 95 |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117138 | KwaZulu-Natal, UNR | 84 | NA | NA |
| 31˚95.83′ S, 30˚17.43′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121006 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | NO | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121539 | Gauteng, Pretoria | CA | 81 | 103 |
| 25˚00′ S, 28˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117124 | Limpopo, Tzaneen | NA | NA | 85 |
| 23˚56′ S, 29˚56′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117123 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 29˚03.71′ S, 29˚23.70′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117115 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | NA |
| 29˚03.71′ S, 29˚23.70′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121020 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 98 | CA |
| 28˚58.72′ S, 29˚13.80′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117100 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | 109 |
| 28˚57.82′ S, 29˚12.28′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 117116 | KwaZulu-Natal, Drakensberg | NA | NA | CA |
| 28˚58.08′ S, 29˚14.11′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121007 | Mpumalanga, BKNR | CA | 118 | CA |
| 25˚00′ S, 30˚00′ E | ||||||
|
|
| 121534 | Northern Cape, Kuruman | CA | 105 | 85 |
| 27˚11′ S, 23˚00′ E | ||||||
CA, cytotoxic activity observed; NA, no activity; NO, not observable.
H.G.W.J., schweikerdt herbarium of the university of pretoria.
Buffelskloof Nature Reserve.
Kirstenbosch Botanical Garden.
Umtamvuna Nature Reserve.
Pretoria National Botanical Garden.
FIGURE 1Comparison of the stacked 1H NMR spectra of the most active polar Helichrysum species extracts studied by Yazdi et al. (2019). (A). with the NMR spectrum of a fraction isolated from H. populifolium with the best active profile from the study conducted by Heyman et al. (2015). (B). The chemical shifts linked to the caffeoylquinic acid type compounds were present in the Helichrysum polar extracts (red boxes). (A). and areas with the most contribution are highlighted with solid line boxes. (B).
FIGURE 2PCA score plot did not exhibit a significant correlation between active and non-active Helichrysum polar extracts. R2X: 0.766 and Q2 (cum): 0.571. Active extracts, extracts with no activity. (A). The OPLS-DA score plot showing good separation of the active and non-active Helichrysum polar extracts with some overlap in the center, R2X = 0.683 and Q2 (cum) = 0.227. Active extracts, extracts with no activity. (B). The OPLS-DA plots were validated by Permutation (100 permutations on the first five components). R2, Q2. (C).
FIGURE 3HCA dendrogram showing the attribute distances between each group of sequentially merged classes in active (blue and green) and non-active polar extracts (red and yellow). (A). Clustering observed in the OPLS-DA score scatter plot supports the HCA dendrogram analysis by separating active and non-active Helichrysum polar extracts. (B). (AH: active Helichrysum species, NH: non-active Helichrysum).
FIGURE 4Contribution plot (A) and S-plot (B) generated two groups of the most active and non-active Helichrysum extracts and showing the typical signals of cinnamoyl units. In the contribution plot, upward bars indicate the NMR regions associated with the active samples, and downward bars indicate the NMR regions associated with the non-active samples. , Buckets of whole NMR signals analysis. , Potential biomarker NMR buckets.
FIGURE 5The OPLS-DA score plot of the selected active and selected non-active Helichrysum polar extracts. (A). The contribution plot generated by comparing two groups of active and non-active Helichrysum extracts and showing the typical signals of CQA units. In the contribution plot, upward bars indicate the NMR regions associated with the active samples, and downward bars indicate the NMR regions associated with the non-active samples (B), the loading S-plot indicating the buckets that are most responsible with activity of the active Helichrysum extracts. (C). , Buckets of NMR signals. , potential biomarkers NMR buckets.
FIGURE 6The OPLS-DA score plot of the active and non-active Helichrysum polar extracts. (A). The red marked upward bars of the contribution plot and red spots on the S-plot generated by comparing active and non-active groups of Helichrysum extracts show the typical signals of quinic acid units in the active group. (B,C). , Buckets of NMR signals analysis. , Potential biomarker NMR peaks.