Literature DB >> 35930022

Comparison of radiographic pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Daniel B Knox1,2, Alex Brunhoeber3, Ithan D Peltan3,4, Samuel M Brown3,4, Michael J Lanspa3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35930022      PMCID: PMC9362414          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06816-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum may complicate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Early studies in ARDS caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggested increased pneumothorax incidence but lacked relevant controls [1, 2]. We investigated whether COVID-19 ARDS is associated with more radiographic pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum than pre-pandemic ARDS and whether pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 ARDS is associated with worse outcomes or differing treatments. This retrospective cohort study included adult ARDS patients admitted between 2017 and 2021 to a 23-hospital system in the Intermountain West. We abstracted data from the electronic health record and used natural language processing to identify radiographic pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum [3, 4]. We performed bivariate and adjusted analyses to compare patients with pre-pandemic ARDS (2017–2020) to patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result proximate to ARDS (2020–2021) (see also Supplemental Methods). Comparing 2,211 patients with COVID-19 ARDS and 5522 with pre-pandemic ARDS (Table 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1), unadjusted incidence of pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum was similar (24% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.148). After adjustment, pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum risk was significantly higher in COVID-19 vs. pre-pandemic ARDS (adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.13–1.52, p < 0.001). COVID-19 ARDS patients had significantly higher rates of pneumomediastinum but not pneumothorax in unadjusted and adjusted analyses (Table 1 and Supplemental Table 2). Compared to COVID-19 ARDS, chest tube placement for pre-pandemic pneumothorax patients was more frequent (52.1% vs. 38.2%, p < 0.001), occurred earlier (− 0.4 vs. 1.3 days, p < 0.001) and remained in place longer (9.9 days vs. 7 days, p < 0.001).
Table 1

Summary demographic and outcome data presented as n (%) or median [IQR]

OverallpNo pneumothorax or pneumomediastinumPneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinump
COVID-19PrepandemicCOVID-19PrepandemicCOVID-19Prepandemic
n22115522168042825311240
Female810 (36.6)2377 (43)< 0.001641 (38.2)1913 (44.7)169 (31.8)464 (37.4)< 0.001
Age61 [49, 70]63 [51, 74]< 0.00161 [49, 71]64 [52, 74]61 [49, 69]61 [46, 71]< 0.001
ARDS Qualifying Diagnostic Group (more than one category possible)
 Trauma130 (5.9)1199 (21.7)< 0.00189 (5.3)742 (17.3)41 (7.7)457 (36.9)< 0.001
 Pneumonia2132 (96.4)2689 (48.7)< 0.0011621 (96.5)2124 (49.6)511 (96.2)565 (45.6)< 0.001
 Sepsis37 (1.7)1208 (21.9)< 0.00126 (1.5)985 (23)11 (2.1)223 (18)< 0.001
 Aspiration95 (4.3)1390 (25.2)< 0.00170 (4.2)1123 (26.2)25 (4.7)267 (21.5)< 0.001
 Shock228 (10.3)787 (14.3)< 0.001155 (9.2)505 (11.8)73 (13.7)282 (22.7)< 0.001
 Acute pancreatitis16 (0.7)144 (2.6)< 0.00111 (0.7)115 (2.7)5 (0.9)29 (2.3)< 0.001
 Overdose15 (0.7)336 (6.1)< 0.00114 (0.8)288 (6.7)1 (0.2)48 (3.9)< 0.001
Worst ARDS severity (first 7 days)
 Mild38 (1.7)955 (17.3)< 0.00132 (1.9)794 (18.5)6 (1.1)161 (13)< 0.001
 Moderate232 (10.5)2581 (46.7)194 (11.5)2045 (47.8)38 (7.2)536 (43.2)
 Severe1941 (87.8)1986 (36)1454 (86.5)1443 (33.7)487 (91.7)543 (43.8)
Hospital Day 1 Lowest P/F Ratio78.1 [61.7, 118.9]148.6 [96.7, 204.8]< 0.00179.4 [62.9, 124.1]148.4 [96.8, 203.5]74.4 [60.8, 101.5]149.2 [96.2, 212.9]< 0.001
Hospital day 1 SOFA Score6 [4, 9]8 [5, 11]< 0.0016 [4, 9]8 [5, 11]7 [4, 10]8 [5, 11]< 0.001
BMI32.8 [28.4, 38.9]28.9 [24.3, 35.4]< 0.00133.5 [28.5, 40.1]29.2 [24.4, 35.9]31.5 [27.5, 35.8]28 [23.9, 34]< 0.001
Weighted (von Walraven) Elixhauser comorbidity score15 [7, 25]23 [13, 32]< 0.00115 [6.5, 24]23 [14, 32]17 [10, 26]22 [12, 32]< 0.001
Days from admission until endotracheal Intubation0.8 [0, 3.9]0.1 [0, 1.3]< 0.0010.7 [0, 3.3]0.1 [0, 1.1]1.2 [0, 5.3]0.3 [0, 1.8]< 0.001
Maximum respiratory support on hospital day 1
 FiO2100 [66, 100]76.5 [50, 100]< 0.001100 [66, 100]74 [50, 100]100 [70, 100]81 [40, 100]< 0.001
 PEEP14 [10, 18]8 [7, 10]< 0.00114 [10, 18]8 [7, 12]15 [12, 18]8 [7, 10]< 0.001
 Plateau pressure29 [25, 32]22 [18, 26]< 0.00129 [25, 32]22 [18, 26]29 [26, 33]21 [17, 26]< 0.001
 Peak inspiratory pressure31 [21, 36]26 [20, 32]< 0.00130 [21, 36]25 [19, 32]33 [23, 37]27 [21, 33]< 0.001
 Positive pressure ventilation1281 (58)4189 (76)< 0.001970 (57.8)3306 (77.3)311 (58.6)883 (71.4)< 0.001
 Invasive mechanical ventilation872 (39.5)2902 (52.6)< 0.001639 (38.1)2194 (51.3)233 (43.9)708 (57.3)< 0.001
Outcomes
 Pneumomediastinum288 (13)188 (3.4)< 0.001288 (54.2)188 (15.2)< 0.001
 Pneumothorax448 (20.3)1201 (21.7)0.158448 (84.4)1201 (96.9)< 0.001
 Pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum531 (24)1240 (22.5)0.148
 Days from admission until pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum7.3 [2.9, 12.6]1.3 [0.1, 5.1]< 0.0017.3 [2.9, 12.6]1.3 [0.1, 5.1]< 0.001
 Hospital Length of Stay (days)14.5 [9.5, 23.7]9.2 [5.3, 15.4]< 0.00113.1 [8.9, 21]8.3 [4.9, 13.6]20.8 [12.8, 33.4]13.9 [8.4, 21]< 0.001
 30 Day Mortality871 (39.4)1572 (28.5)< 0.001608 (36.2)1265 (29.5)263 (49.5)307 (24.8)< 0.001
 ICU Length of Stay10.4 [6, 18.4]4.9 [2.5, 9.9]< 0.0019 [5.2, 15.2]4.3 [2.2, 8.6]17.1 [10.1, 27.3]7.9 [4, 14.4]< 0.001
Management of pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum
 Chest tube placed203 (38.2)646 (52.1)< 0.001
 Days from admission until chest tube placement8.6 [3.9, 15.9]0.9 [0.2, 3.8]< 0.001
 Duration of chest tube (days)9.9 [4.9, 17]7 [4.1, 11.5]< 0.001
Treatment occurring prior to pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum
 Nasal canula utilized228 (44)598 (56.5)< 0.001
 High-flow nasal canula utilized402 (77.6)179 (16.9)< 0.001
 Non-invasive ventilation utilized251 (48.5)368 (34.8)< 0.001
 Invasive ventilation utilized400 (77.2)783 (74)< 0.001
 Positive pressure ventilation481 (92.9)918 (86.8)< 0.001
 Nasal canula days0 [0, 0.9]0.2 [0, 2]< 0.001
 High-flow nasal canula0.6 [0, 3.5]0 [0, 0]< 0.001
 Non-invasive ventilation0 [0, 0.7]0 [0, 0.3]< 0.001
 Invasive ventilation days2 [0, 8.4]0.3 [0, 2.6]< 0.001
 Maximum FiO2100 [100, 100]100 [65.5, 100]< 0.001
 Maximum PEEP16 [14, 20]10 [8, 12]< 0.001
 Maximum plateau pressure34 [30, 40]24 [19, 30]< 0.001
 Maximum peak inspiratory pressure38 [28, 45]29 [23, 36]< 0.001
Summary demographic and outcome data presented as n (%) or median [IQR] Mortality rates in COVID-19 ARDS were higher than pre-pandemic ARDS (39.4% vs. 28.5% p < 0.001). Among COVID-19 ARDS patients, we observed higher 30-day mortality rates with pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum (49.5% vs. 36.2%, p < 0.001), while we observed a lower mortality in pre-pandemic ARDS patients with pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum (24.8% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.001). Adjusted analyses yielded similar results (Supplemental Table 3). Prior to pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum, both COVID-19 and pre-pandemic ARDS cohorts had similar receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation (77% vs. 74%, p = 0.17). COVID-19 patients received higher maximum PEEP (16 vs. 10 mmHg, p < 0.001). The median duration of invasive ventilation prior to pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum was much longer in the COVID-19 patients (2 vs. 0.3 days, p < 0.001; Supplemental Fig. 2), as was time from admission until pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum (7.3 vs. 1.3 days, p < 0.001). Study strengths include comparison of large, multi-hospital COVID-19 and control ARDS cohorts. Limitations include the possibility of unmeasured confounding and potentially counting radiographic pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum events that were “clinically insignificant” or not due to acute lung injury. We note a substantially higher rate of pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum compared with other published cohorts (Supplemental Table 5). Our detection is more sensitive than clinically reported as all events are included, not just pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum > 2 cm or presence in clinical notes, which may limit generalizability. The relationships between radiographic and clinically significant pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum risk factors (including use of guideline-endorsed “high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)” ventilation [5]), and pneumothorax management warrant further study. In conclusion, COVID-19 ARDS patients experienced similar rates of radiographic pneumothorax but more pneumomediastinum. Chest tubes were used less frequently and placed later in COVID-19 ARDS than in pre-pandemic ARDS. Radiographic pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 ARDS patients is associated with an increased mortality. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 137 KB) Supplementary file2 (PDF 189 KB) Supplementary file3 (DOCX 90 KB)
  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Early Sedation With Dexmedetomidine on Body Temperature in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Kim E Grayson; Michael Bailey; Mayurathan Balachandran; Piyusha P Banneheke; Alessandro Belletti; Rinaldo Bellomo; Thummaporn Naorungroj; Ary Serpa-Neto; Jason D Wright; Fumitaka Yanase; Paul J Young; Yahya Shehabi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  A Computable Phenotype for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Majid Afshar; Cara Joyce; Anthony Oakey; Perry Formanek; Philip Yang; Matthew M Churpek; Richard S Cooper; Susan Zelisko; Ron Price; Dmitriy Dligach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Eddy Fan; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Ewan C Goligher; Carol L Hodgson; Laveena Munshi; Allan J Walkey; Neill K J Adhikari; Marcelo B P Amato; Richard Branson; Roy G Brower; Niall D Ferguson; Ognjen Gajic; Luciano Gattinoni; Dean Hess; Jordi Mancebo; Maureen O Meade; Daniel F McAuley; Antonio Pesenti; V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Eileen Rubin; Maureen Seckel; Arthur S Slutsky; Daniel Talmor; B Taylor Thompson; Hannah Wunsch; Elizabeth Uleryk; Jan Brozek; Laurent J Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  External Validation of an Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Prediction Model Using Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Anoop Mayampurath; Matthew M Churpek; Xin Su; Sameep Shah; Elizabeth Munroe; Bhakti Patel; Dmitriy Dligach; Majid Afshar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 9.296

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Pulmonary air leak in COVID-19: time to learn from our mistakes.

Authors:  Mohamed Boussarsar; Alessandro Protti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 41.787

2.  Air leak, barotrauma susceptibility, and imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome: novel application of an old tool.

Authors:  Alessandro Belletti; Diego Palumbo; Giovanni Landoni; Alberto Zangrillo; Michele De Bonis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 41.787

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.