Literature DB >> 35927539

Accuracy and trending ability of finger plethysmographic cardiac output monitoring in late pregnancy.

Paul Bonnin1, Benjamin Constans1,2, Alain Duhamel3,4, Maéva Kyheng3,4, Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors1, Max Gonzalez Estevez1, Benoit Tavernier1,3, Alexandre Gaudet5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Individuals in late pregnancy are at risk of significant hemodynamic variations, especially during Cesarean delivery. Although non-invasive monitoring might enable the early detection of variations in cardiac output (CO), clinical validation is lacking.
METHODS: In a prospective, single-center study, we measured CO simultaneously with finger plethysmography and transthoracic echocardiography in 100 third-trimester pregnant individuals in the supine and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions.
RESULTS: A Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean (standard deviation) bias of 1.36 (1.04) L·min-1 in the supine position (95% limits of agreement, -0.68 to 3.4 L·min-1; percent error, 26.6%), indicating overestimation by finger plethysmography. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.51). Regarding the changes in CO induced by the supine-to-LLD transition, the concordance rate in a four-quadrant plot was 98.3% (95% CI, 91.1 to 99.9%).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed a poor reliability of finger plethysmography for static measurement of CO. Nevertheless, finger plethysmography had a reasonably high concordance rate for the detection of CO changes secondary to positional changes in late-pregnant individuals. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03735043); registered 8 November 2018.
© 2022. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac output; echocardiography; monitoring; non-invasive; pregnancy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927539     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02297-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


  25 in total

1.  Influence of postspinal hypotension on the fetal electrocardiogram.

Authors:  H EBNER; J BARCOHANA; A K BARTOSHUK
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cardiac disease in pregnancy: value of echocardiography.

Authors:  Sarah Tsiaras; Athena Poppas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Methods and considerations concerning cardiac output measurement in pregnant women: recommendations of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics.

Authors:  R C Bijl; H Valensise; G P Novelli; B Vasapollo; I Wilkinson; B Thilaganathan; E J Stöhr; C Lees; C D van der Marel; J M J Cornette
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Aortocaval Compression Syndrome: Time to Revisit Certain Dogmas.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Ruth Landau
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period?

Authors:  Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Jean-Pierre Goarin; Benoît Tavernier; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome.

Authors:  B C Corke; S Datta; G W Ostheimer; J B Weiss; M H Alper
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Jakob Stensballe; Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors; Marie-Pierre Bonnet; Edoardo De Robertis; Ino Fornet; François Goffinet; Stefan Hofer; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Susana Manrique; Jacky Nizard; François Christory; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-François Hardy
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

Authors:  C C Rout; D A Rocke; J Levin; E Gouws; D Reddy
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial.

Authors:  F J Mercier; P Diemunsch; A-S Ducloy-Bouthors; A Mignon; M Fischler; J-M Malinovsky; F Bolandard; A G Aya; M Raucoules-Aimé; D Chassard; H Keita; A Rigouzzo; A Le Gouez
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 10.  Validation of maternal cardiac output assessed by transthoracic echocardiography against pulmonary artery catheterization in severely ill pregnant women: prospective comparative study and systematic review.

Authors:  J Cornette; S Laker; B Jeffery; H Lombaard; A Alberts; D Rizopoulos; J W Roos-Hesselink; R C Pattinson
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.