Literature DB >> 24970272

6% Hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) vs Ringer's lactate preloading before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: the randomized, double-blind, multicentre CAESAR trial.

F J Mercier1, P Diemunsch2, A-S Ducloy-Bouthors3, A Mignon4, M Fischler5, J-M Malinovsky6, F Bolandard7, A G Aya8, M Raucoules-Aimé9, D Chassard10, H Keita11, A Rigouzzo12, A Le Gouez13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasopressor administration is recommended to prevent hypotension during spinal anaesthesia (SA) for elective Caesarean delivery. We aimed to test the superior efficacy and ensure safety of a hydroxyethyl starch (HES) vs a Ringer's lactate (RL) preloading, when combined with a phenylephrine-based prophylaxis.
METHODS: A total of 167 healthy parturients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery under SA were included in this multicentre, randomized, double-blind study. Patients received 500 ml of 6% HES (130/0.4)+500 ml of RL (HES group) or 1000 ml of RL (RL group) i.v. before SA. After SA, i.v. phenylephrine boluses were titrated when systolic arterial pressure (SAP) was below 95% of baseline. The primary outcome was the incidence of maternal hypotension (SAP <80% of baseline).
RESULTS: The incidence of both hypotension and symptomatic hypotension (i.e. with dizziness, nausea/vomiting, or both) was significantly lower in the HES group vs the RL group: 36.6% vs 55.3% (one-sided P=0.025) and 3.7% vs 14.1%. There was no significant difference in total phenylephrine requirements [median (range): 350 (50-1800) vs 350 (50-1250) µg]. The decrease in maternal haemoglobin value the day after surgery was similar in the two groups [1.2 (1.0) vs 1.0 (0.9) g dl(-1)]. There was no detectable placental transfer of HES in six umbilical cord blood samples analysed in the HES group. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a pure RL preloading, a mixed HES-RL preloading significantly improved prevention of both hypotension and symptomatic hypotension based on early phenylephrine bolus administration and did not induce adverse effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00694343 (http://clinicaltrials.gov).
© The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; anaesthesia, spinal; fluid therapy, hydroxyethyl starch; fluid therapy, preloading; hypotension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24970272     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Comments on the updated German S3 guidelines on intravascular volume therapy in adults].

Authors:  Emmanuel Schneck; Michael Sander; Bernd Saugel; Daniel A Reuter; Marit Habicher
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Impact of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring on maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Aya Kimura; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Influence of saline-based hydroxyethyl starch on umbilical cord blood electrolytes.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Atsushi Nishigaki; Takahiko Tamura; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  [Antihypotensive drugs in cesarean sections : Treatment of arterial hypotension with ephedrine, phenylephrine and Akrinor® (cafedrine/theodrenaline) during cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia].

Authors:  Daniel Chappell; Antonia Helf; Jan Gayer; Leopold Eberhart; Peter Kranke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Accuracy and trending ability of finger plethysmographic cardiac output monitoring in late pregnancy.

Authors:  Paul Bonnin; Benjamin Constans; Alain Duhamel; Maéva Kyheng; Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors; Max Gonzalez Estevez; Benoit Tavernier; Alexandre Gaudet
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  Effects of hydroxyethyl starch 6 % (130/0.4) on blood loss during cesarean delivery: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Abdullah S Terkawi; Sarah K Larkin; Siny Tsang; Jessica S Sheeran; Mohamed Tiouririne
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus crystalloid co-loading during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Shigemune Kuwata; Sayaka Tsujimoto; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Fluid management in living donor hepatectomy: Recent issues and perspectives.

Authors:  Seong-Soo Choi; Sung-Hoon Kim; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Cheryl Chooi; Julia J Cox; Richard S Lumb; Philippa Middleton; Mark Chemali; Richard S Emmett; Scott W Simmons; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Phenylephrine infusion for spinal-induced hypotension in elective cesarean delivery: Does preload make a difference?

Authors:  Brandi A Bottiger; Dmitri S Bezinover; Berend Mets; Priti G Dalal; Jansie Prozesky; Serdar Ural; Sonia Vaida
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.