| Literature DB >> 35924208 |
Tetyana Koso1, Marco Beaumont2,3, Blaise L Tardy3, Daniel Rico Del Cerro1, Samuel Eyley4, Wim Thielemans4, Orlando J Rojas3,5, Ilkka Kilpeläinen1, Alistair W T King1,6.
Abstract
Gas-phase acylation is an attractive and sustainable method for modifying the surface properties of cellulosics. However, little is known concerning the regioselectivity of the chemistry, i.e., which cellulose hydroxyls are preferentially acylated and if acylation can be restricted to the surface, preserving crystallinities/morphologies. Consequently, we reexplore simple gas-phase acetylation of modern-day cellulosic building blocks - cellulose nanocrystals, pulps, dry-jet wet spun (regenerated cellulose) fibres and a nanocellulose-based aerogel. Using advanced analytics, we show that the gas-phase acetylation is highly regioselective for the C6-OH, a finding also supported by DFT-based transition-state modelling on a crystalloid surface. This contrasts with acid- and base-catalysed liquid-phase acetylation methods, highlighting that gas-phase chemistry is much more controllable, yet with similar kinetics, to the uncatalyzed liquid-phase reactions. Furthermore, this method preserves both the native (or regenerated) crystalline structure of the cellulose and the supramolecular morphology of even delicate cellulosic constructs (nanocellulose aerogel exhibiting chiral cholesteric liquid crystalline phases). Due to the soft nature of this chemistry and an ability to finely control the kinetics, yielding highly regioselective low degree of substitution products, we are convinced this method will facilitate the rapid adoption of precisely tailored and biodegradable cellulosic materials. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35924208 PMCID: PMC9290444 DOI: 10.1039/d2gc01141g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Green Chem ISSN: 1463-9262 Impact factor: 11.034
Fig. 4Comparison of regioselectivity (surface reaction confinement and RI) and cellulose Iβ CI changes, through NMR and WAXS analysis, for gas- vs. liquid-phase acetylations (in presence or absence of common neutral organic bases).
Fig. 3DFT rPES's for acetate-AGU dihedral angle rotation and transition-state calculation of the acetylation mechanism, for 2-, 3- and 6-OH acetylation, using Ac2O. H-bonds are in black dotted lines. Movement of electrons on going from OH to OAc form are indicated by magenta arrows.
Fig. 1(a) Reaction setup and expected surface regioselectivity, (b) bulk degree of substitution and 6-OH acetylation regioselectivity (RI), (c) diffusion-edited 1H NMR spectra showing high RI (decreasing RI as DS increases) and a bulk DS (at 32 days) close to that predicted for full 6-OH surface acetylation of a 24-chain rhomboid softwood elementary fibril model[47] – CA is cellulose acetate (DS ∼2.4).
Fig. 2(a and b) Analytical methodology leading to AFM and NMR analyses, (c and d) High resolution AFM for the 32 day acetylated FD-CNCs (with cross-section profiles), and HSQC spectra for: (e) 32 day acetylated FD-CNCs in the [P4444][OAc]:DMSO-d6 electrolyte (bulk analysis), (f) 32 day acetylated FD-CNCs dispersed into DMSO-d6 (surface chains detectable only).
Fig. 5Range of cellulose substrates evaluated where the overall 6-OAc regioselectivity and comparative kinetics are shown through the diffusion-edited 1H NMR spectra.