Marco Beaumont1, Blaise L Tardy2, Guillermo Reyes2, Tetyana V Koso3, Elisabeth Schaubmayr1, Paul Jusner1, Alistair W T King3, Raymond R Dagastine4, Antje Potthast1, Orlando J Rojas2,5, Thomas Rosenau1,6. 1. Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry of Renewable Resources, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Konrad-Lorenz-Str. 24, 3430 Tulln, Austria. 2. Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16300, Espoo FI-00076, Finland. 3. Materials Chemistry Division, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, AI Virtasen aukio 1, FI-00560 Helsinki, Finland. 4. Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. 5. Bioproducts Institute, Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Department of Chemistry and Department of Wood Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. 6. Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Åbo Akademi University, Porthansgatan 3, Åbo/Turku FI-20500, Finland.
Abstract
Selective surface modification of biobased fibers affords effective individualization and functionalization into nanomaterials, as exemplified by the TEMPO-mediated oxidation. However, such a route leads to changes of the native surface chemistry, affecting interparticle interactions and limiting the development of potential supermaterials. Here we introduce a methodology to extract elementary cellulose fibrils by treatment of biomass with N-succinylimidazole, achieving regioselective surface modification of C6-OH, which can be reverted using mild post-treatments. No polymer degradation, cross-linking, nor changes in crystallinity occur under the mild processing conditions, yielding cellulose nanofibrils bearing carboxyl moieties, which can be removed by saponification. The latter offers a significant opportunity in the reconstitution of the chemical and structural interfaces associated with the native states. Consequently, 3D structuring of native elementary cellulose nanofibrils is made possible with the same supramolecular features as the biosynthesized fibers, which is required to unlock the full potential of cellulose as a sustainable building block.
Selective surface modification of biobased fibers affords effective individualization and functionalization into nanomaterials, as exemplified by the TEMPO-mediated oxidation. However, such a route leads to changes of the native surface chemistry, affecting interparticle interactions and limiting the development of potential supermaterials. Here we introduce a methodology to extract elementary cellulose fibrils by treatment of biomass with N-succinylimidazole, achieving regioselective surface modification of C6-OH, which can be reverted using mild post-treatments. No polymer degradation, cross-linking, nor changes in crystallinity occur under the mild processing conditions, yielding cellulose nanofibrils bearing carboxyl moieties, which can be removed by saponification. The latter offers a significant opportunity in the reconstitution of the chemical and structural interfaces associated with the native states. Consequently, 3D structuring of native elementary cellulose nanofibrils is made possible with the same supramolecular features as the biosynthesized fibers, which is required to unlock the full potential of cellulose as a sustainable building block.
New
bio-based feedstock streams are needed to develop sustainable
materials that surpass in performance the prevalent synthetic counterparts.
In this regard, the isolation from biomass of native structural components
of high intrinsic cohesion and defined morphology presents a unique
opportunity.[1] The biogenesis of cellulose
chains from synthase systems results in polymeric constructs with
one of the highest strengths reported to date. Driven by supramolecular
interactions, tightly packed elementary fibrils are formed (diameter
of approximately 3–4 nm) exhibiting a remarkable tensile strength
and modulus, reaching values as high as 7 GPa[2,3] and
140 GPa,[4−6] respectively. They can be readily obtained from forestry,
ocean, and agricultural side-streams, and their promise in high-performance
sustainable materials has triggered great interest over the past decade.[1,3] However, there is a standing need for new, green routes to re-engineer
the native cellulosic supramolecular interactions into macroscale
materials, ideally in line with green chemistry and technology principles.Mechanical fibrillation of the plant cell wall, following optional
pretreatments (e.g., enzymatic), results in bundles
of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) carrying residual hemicelluloses,
which dominate most supramolecular interactions, given their higher
surface activity and reactivity.[7,8] The most prominent chemical
pretreatment that enables individualization into elementary fibrils
is a nearly regioselective modification by oxidation of the cellulose’s
primary OH groups, namely, TEMPO-mediated oxidation (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl-oxyl
being the oxidant).[9] An alternative approach
is the periodate oxidation and subsequent Pinnick oxidation,[10] which converts the secondary alcohol groups
of cellulose into carboxyl moieties after C2–C3 bond cleavage.
While these modifications are commonly used, they also have major
drawbacks, including those related to chemical degradation and their
irreversibility. For instance, complete surface modification of the
nanofibrils by TEMPO-oxidation has been demonstrated to occur in alkaline
media,[11,12] causing a drastic decrease in molar mass,[13] which even occurs at moderate oxidation conditions
(in the range of 0.5 mmol COOH g–1 of CNFs).[14,15] These effects limit the mechanical performance and the corresponding
prospects of the assembled materials.[16] In addition, TEMPO-oxidation is irreversible, yielding nanofibrils
with carboxylated surfaces, which prevent the strong interactions
that are otherwise present in native supramolecular structures.[11] By contrast, cellulose esters can be cleaved
by saponification, enabling the recovery of the intrinsic surface
functionality and cohesive interactions.[17] This latter observation inspired our study, as presented in this
discussion.Herein, cellulose fibers were deconstructed into
elementary fibrils
by regioselective modification with N-succinylimidazole
(Figure ). This surface
modification is introduced on the entire fibril surface, with very
high selectivity toward the primary hydroxyl group of cellulose.[18−20] The method is mild and does not lead to dissolution nor influence
the inherent physicochemical properties, such as crystallinity and
molar mass, while preserving the morphology of the elementary structures,
even at complete surface functionalization. Preserving such native
properties is essential to maintain the excellent mechanical properties
of cellulose.[4,5] The negative carboxylate charge
facilitates individualization into elementary nanofibrils, which can
be processed, in a fashion similar to TEMPO-CNF, into an arbitrary
shape, e.g., by extrusion, wet-spinning, or film formation.[1,21,22] While for TEMPO-CNF the interfacial
interactions are permanently impacted by carboxyls groups, the succinyl
ester moieties can be hydrolyzed (saponified) under mild basic conditions
to recover the pristine chemical structure of cellulose I, re-establishing
its native supramolecular interactions. This offers a unique route
to enhance processability of plant biomass into materials while recovering
their performance potential. We describe the efficiency of the reaction,
its regioselectivity, and reversibility by nuclear magnetic resonance,
infrared spectroscopy, and gel permeation chromatography. The morphology
of the elementary fibrils is then evaluated using atomic force microscopy
and scanning electron microscopy, revealing the fibril morphology
and size, which match those of the native fibrils. Finally, we demonstrate
processing in aqueous media that leads to hydrogels, aerogels, and
films, the latter being compared for their mechanical properties before
and after saponification. The presented new avenue to engineer cellulosic
building blocks will unlock new opportunities in the fabrication of
sustainable, high-strength, and lightweight materials.
Figure 1
Elementary succinylated
cellulose nanofibrils (C6SA-CNF) were produced
from renewable cellulose fibers by regioselective esterification of
the primary C6-OH through reaction with N-succinyl
imidazole followed by fibrillation in a high-pressure homogenizer
(1). As is the case of conventional CNF, C6SA-CNF forms hydrogels
of given shapes (2) but is amenable to removal of the installed groups
by facile hydrolysis. Hence, 3D structures can be formed, which are
composed of the elementary fibrils of cellulose in its type I, the
native cellulose allomorph (3). The hydrolysis treatment induces strong
interfibrillar interactions, rivaling those present in the native
cellulose I crystals.
Elementary succinylated
cellulose nanofibrils (C6SA-CNF) were produced
from renewable cellulose fibers by regioselective esterification of
the primary C6-OH through reaction with N-succinyl
imidazole followed by fibrillation in a high-pressure homogenizer
(1). As is the case of conventional CNF, C6SA-CNF forms hydrogels
of given shapes (2) but is amenable to removal of the installed groups
by facile hydrolysis. Hence, 3D structures can be formed, which are
composed of the elementary fibrils of cellulose in its type I, the
native cellulose allomorph (3). The hydrolysis treatment induces strong
interfibrillar interactions, rivaling those present in the native
cellulose I crystals.
Results
and Discussion
The preparation of structural assemblies based
on pristine, individualized,
cellulose nanofibrils is shown schematically in Figure . The native cellulose fibers were regioselectively
modified by succinylation of the surface C6-OH glucose repeating units.
Thereby, CNFs with the same selectivity (C6) and largely similar chemical
functionality (succinate vs carboxylate) as the well-known TEMPO-CNF
were obtained. The process was mediated via a reactive acylimidazole
intermediate[18−20] and can be applied directly to never-dried biomass,
i.e., wet pulp fibers, commonly used for the preparation of CNFs.[10,12,18] The reaction is water-promoted
and even proceeds faster in the presence of water as it is an acyl
transfer rather than a classical esterification.[19,20] Never-dried dissolving-grade beech pulp was used as starting material.
The modification was conducted in an acetone/water solvent system
in the presence of succinic anhydride (1.0 molar equiv based on cellulose
monomer unit) and imidazole (1.5 equiv) that generate the acylating
agent N-succinylimidazole in situ (Figure A). The esterification was
completed after 6.25 h and the final carboxylate content can be tailored
by varying the reaction conditions (Figure S1). Afterward, acetone and the remaining reactants were removed by
thorough washing with water. Successful introduction of the succinyl
group was demonstrated by infrared spectroscopy, which confirmed the
presence of the carbonyl bands at 1568 cm–1 and
1723 cm–1 (Figure B). The modified cellulose was directly compared with
the starting material, never-dried cellulose fibers, which is referred
to as “reference”. The degree of substitution, determined
by conductometric titration (Figure S2)
was 0.25 ± 0.02, corresponding to a carboxylate content of 1.3
± 0.1 mmol/g (Table S1). These values
were also confirmed by diffusion-edited liquid-state NMR in the [P4444][OAc]:DMSO-d6 solvent.[23,24] This analysis also afforded information on the regioselectivity
of the modification (Figure C),[19,20] and NMR peaks were assigned through
the respective multiplicity-edited heteronuclear single-quantum correlation
(HSQC) spectrum (Figure S3). The calculated
total DS and that specific to the primary C6-OH were 0.24 and 0.22,
respectively, yielding a reaction regioselectivity of 92%. Based on
the crystallite size, we calculated the theoretically available C6-OH
number of 0.22 (Table S1) and concluded
that the entire number of available C6-OH groups at the surface of
the elementary fibrils had reacted, a regioselectivity that was previously
only possible with TEMPO-oxidation.[11] Solid-state
NMR (Figure S4 and Figure E), was used to gather information on the
fibril superstructure based on deconvolution of the C4 peak, composed
of a chemically nonaccessible, crystalline core and an accessible
surface.[25,26] One of the peaks corresponding to the chemically
accessible surface—shaded in dark gray and bronze for reference
and C6SA-CNF, respectively—is clearly shifted upfield (from
83.2 to 82.5 ppm) upon surface modification. We assign this peak to
C4 of the C6-succinylated glucopyranose surface units and further
conclude a homogeneous surface modification. In addition, it is
clearly shown that the fibril superstructure and crystallinity (Table S1) is well preserved, which contrasts
with NMR results of TEMPO-oxidized CNF (Figure S5). Compared to oxidative treatments, such as periodate or
TEMPO-oxidation, the molar mass is not reduced (although changes occurred
due to the introduction of succinyl groups, Figure D). The increase of the weight-averaged degree
of polymerization upon modification is the result of removal of hemicelluloses
and/or low molar mass cellulose fractions; the former reason, in fact,
was confirmed by solid-state NMR measurements (Table S1).
Figure 2
N-Succinyl imidazole, the acyl transfer
agent,
was produced in situ through reaction of imidazole and succinic anhydride
(A). The wet cellulose fibers were treated at 40 °C for 6.25
h in an acetone/water mixture to introduce the succinyl group onto
the primary C6-OH of cellulose (92% selectivity). The IR spectrum
clearly demonstrates the successful introduction of the succinyl group
(*λ = 1723 cm–1, #λ = 1568
cm–1) (B), and the regioselectivity was studied
by solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance, showing only minor modification
of the C2- and C3-OH (2-,3-SA) (C). The molar mass (both weight- and z-averaged) increased through introduction of the succinyl
group (D). The superstructure and crystallinity index (CI), studied
by solid-state NMR, were preserved, confirming that the reaction was
confined to the accessible (amorphous) nanofibril surface (E).
N-Succinyl imidazole, the acyl transfer
agent,
was produced in situ through reaction of imidazole and succinic anhydride
(A). The wet cellulose fibers were treated at 40 °C for 6.25
h in an acetone/water mixture to introduce the succinyl group onto
the primary C6-OH of cellulose (92% selectivity). The IR spectrum
clearly demonstrates the successful introduction of the succinyl group
(*λ = 1723 cm–1, #λ = 1568
cm–1) (B), and the regioselectivity was studied
by solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance, showing only minor modification
of the C2- and C3-OH (2-,3-SA) (C). The molar mass (both weight- and z-averaged) increased through introduction of the succinyl
group (D). The superstructure and crystallinity index (CI), studied
by solid-state NMR, were preserved, confirming that the reaction was
confined to the accessible (amorphous) nanofibril surface (E).The effect of the fibrillation degree on the rheological
properties
was assessed for C6SA-CNF and compared to that of TO-CNF (prepared
under neutral conditions)[14] (Figure S6), showing that C6SA-CNF underwent a
slightly more extensive fibrillation. Moreover, we show that, similar
to other CNF types, C6SA-CNF exhibits strong shear-thinning and the
rheological properties typical of a gel, due to its dominant elastic
behavior (G′ > G″)
(Figure S7).The morphology and dimensions
of the nanofibrils were evaluated
using atomic force microscopy (Figure ). In the given scanning areas, the fibrils appeared
rather homogeneous (Figure A); the absence of bundling suggested complete individualization
into elementary nanofibrils through our process. Figure A includes over 50 fibrils
that were clearly individualized, and the corresponding height profiles
revealed rather uniform height values across the sample (Figure A, respective phase
and amplitude images in Figure S9), e.g., a narrow height distribution (3.4
± 0.6 nm, Figure S10). These values
agree with those measured for elementary fibrils (also referred to
as crystallite size) of approximately 4 nm (Table S1). This clearly indicates a complete fibrillation of the
cellulose fiber into its elementary nanofibrils. Interestingly, a
small fraction of the deposits on the surface were smaller fibrils
with heights below 1 nm and lengths of ca. 20 nm. These may be cellulosic
fragments resulting from the pulping process, fibrillation treatment,
and/or residual hemicelluloses.
Figure 3
Atomic force microscopy imaging of elementary
fibrils of C6SA-CNF
(A) and height profiles obtained for 9 fibrils (B). The overview microscopy
image indicates well-dispersed and homogeneous fibrils (C).
Atomic force microscopy imaging of elementary
fibrils of C6SA-CNF
(A) and height profiles obtained for 9 fibrils (B). The overview microscopy
image indicates well-dispersed and homogeneous fibrils (C).The chemistry used herein is nondestructive, which
contrasts significantly
with the oxidative routes conventionally used for modification or
enhanced dispersion of nanocelluloses. Moreover, the introduced succinate
ester is stable under conventional conditions (pH range 3–9).
This enables a wide and versatile application range for C6SA-CNF.
It is well known that ester groups are susceptible to hydrolysis,
i.e., saponification. This is applicable to our modified CNF, i.e., by treatment with 0.1 M NaOH, yielding native elementary
CNF, which we submit to be similar to the natural form (herein referred
to as nat-CNF) (Figure A). It can be reasonably proposed that pristine
cellulose is restored after hydrolysis, upon removal of the succinate
groups, as demonstrated by IR spectroscopy (Figure B) through the disappearance of the carbonyl
bands and as also shown by gel permeation chromatography with multiangle
light scattering detection. Both weight- and z-average
molar mass of the succinylated cellulose were clearly reduced upon
saponification by loss of the succinate, returning to values similar
to those of the reference sample, which is also well reflected in
the respective molar mass distributions (Table S1 and Figure S8). Moreover, the conformation plot of nat-cellulose showed that after hydrolytic treatment the
shape and dependency of the radius of gyration and molar mass of the
dissolved cellulose sample returned to the initial, reference state
(Figure C, black and
gray fits). Generally, the alkaline treatment induced a cross-linking/gelation
of the C6SA-CNF, similar to the behavior of carboxylated CNF under
acidic conditions (protonation) or in the presence of multivalent
ions (ionic cross-linking through replacement of Na+ counterions).
The alkaline treatment can be conducted directly from C6SA-CNF in
sodium form or from C6SA-CNF hydrogels prepared by ionic cross-linking.
Figure 4
Regioselective
introduction of succinyl groups in C6SA-CNF (top-left)
can be reversed by alkaline treatment (0.1 M NaOH, bottom-left) (A),
as shown by IR spectroscopy, through the disappearance of the carbonyl
bands (highlighted in light yellow) (B), as well as by the conformation
plot from light scattering analysis (C). The conformation plot (molar
mass vs radius of gyration, Rg) of the
NaOH-treated C6SA-cellulose and its slope (m) is
almost identical compared to the native sample (assigned as ref in
C), confirming the reversible nature of the succinylation (lines in
C are linear fittings of the respective conformation plot).
Regioselective
introduction of succinyl groups in C6SA-CNF (top-left)
can be reversed by alkaline treatment (0.1 M NaOH, bottom-left) (A),
as shown by IR spectroscopy, through the disappearance of the carbonyl
bands (highlighted in light yellow) (B), as well as by the conformation
plot from light scattering analysis (C). The conformation plot (molar
mass vs radius of gyration, Rg) of the
NaOH-treated C6SA-cellulose and its slope (m) is
almost identical compared to the native sample (assigned as ref in
C), confirming the reversible nature of the succinylation (lines in
C are linear fittings of the respective conformation plot).The effect of various treatments on the properties
of prepared
nanopapers was evaluated through the increase in thickness in relation
to the dry film upon swelling in water (Figure S12). In all cases, treatments were conducted on nanopapers;
base- and acid-treated samples were subsequently washed with water
to remove soluble residues. Without base or acid pretreatment, both
C6SA-CNF and TO-CNF films swelled significantly, as shown by the 8.5-
and 15-fold increase in thickness, respectively. The lower increase
of C6SA-CNF is most probably related to the fact that the succinyl
groups of C6SA-CNF are less hydrophilic compared to the carboxylate
groups in TO-CNF. In contrast, the thickness increased significantly
less after mild acid treatment (0.01 M HCl), due to the protonation
of the carboxylate groups and thereby induced gelation (due to lower
electrostatic repulsion). In comparison, upon exposure to a base treatment
(0.1 M NaOH), the thickness of TO-CNF films increased to a similar
level as that in pure water (13-fold), while C6SA-CNF swelling was
severely limited (3-fold), which is a result of the ester hydrolysis
into nat-CNFs and the induced gelation. The water-swollen
nanopapers are hereafter referred to as hydrogels.The mechanical
properties of the hydrogels, always measured after
equilibration in deionized water regardless of pretreatment, were
evaluated by tensile testing, Figure A,B, with representative tensile strain curves shown
in Figure C. As expected,
both TO-CNF and C6SA-CNF hydrogels showed a rather low mechanical
strength when immersed in water, 0.3 and 2.2 MPa, respectively. The
higher strength of C6SA-CNF hydrogels results from the lower swelling
tendency of C6SA-CNF, which helps to resist the effect of water in
the wet conditions. C6SA-CNF and TO-CNF hydrogels presented similar
tensile strengths under acidic conditions, 12.5 and 20 MPa, respectively
(Figure S13); the elastic modulus and toughness
followed a similar ranking. Upon 0.1 M NaOH treatment, the mechanical
properties of the TO-CNF hydrogel were similar to those measured in
water. In contrast, the tensile strength of NaOH-treated C6SA-CNF
(nat-CNF, Figure B) was of the same order as that of C6SA-CNF, 12 MPa,
when the aqueous medium was changed to an acid medium (Figure S13). This demonstrates that the ester
hydrolysis (saponification) induced physical cross-linking, due to
the removal of the charged ester group, restoring the hydrogen-bond
network of native celluloses.
Figure 5
Mechanical performance of hydrogels produced
from C6SA-CNF and
TO-CNF, which were equilibrated in water prior to (A) and after treatment
in 0.1 M NaOH (B). C6SA-CNF exhibits a stronger mechanical stability
in water compared to TO-CNF, which was especially pronounced after
NaOH treatment, causing ester hydrolysis to yield nat-CNF. Representative tensile curves of the systems compared in A
and B (C). Networks of C6SA-CNF (D) and nat-CNF (E)
in an aerogel. The schematic figures illustrate the possible nanofiber
surface structure with and without prior NaOH treatment.
Mechanical performance of hydrogels produced
from C6SA-CNF and
TO-CNF, which were equilibrated in water prior to (A) and after treatment
in 0.1 M NaOH (B). C6SA-CNF exhibits a stronger mechanical stability
in water compared to TO-CNF, which was especially pronounced after
NaOH treatment, causing ester hydrolysis to yield nat-CNF. Representative tensile curves of the systems compared in A
and B (C). Networks of C6SA-CNF (D) and nat-CNF (E)
in an aerogel. The schematic figures illustrate the possible nanofiber
surface structure with and without prior NaOH treatment.The hydrogels were solvent-exchanged with acetone and supercritically
dried to yield nanofibrillar aerogels. The prepared C6SA-CNF aerogel
featured a specific surface area of 415 m2 g–1, which is comparable to the one of a prepared TEMPO-oxidized CNF
aerogel (see Figure S11 for further information).
Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the fibrillar network
structures were very similar prior to and after removal of the succinyl
groups (Figure D,E).
We speculate that the network formed after saponification resembles
that of native cellulose nanofibrils (Figure ).As shown in Figure C, the supramolecular interactions in water,
upon recovery of the
native cellulose interfaces, resulted in an improved tensile strength,
by ca. 6-fold, with a relatively small reduction of the strain at
break, from 13% to 10%. By favoring supramolecular interactions, upon
drying of nat-CNF hydrogels, the strain at break
was on the other hand reduced, from 3.2% to 1.8% (Figure ). The mechanical performance
of the respective dry films is compared in Figure . A significant increase in strength (2.5-fold,
from 79 MPa to 194 MPa) was realized. Likewise, the Young’s
moduli increased from 7.9 GPa to 19.4 GPa. This suggests a significant
improvement in the interfacial cohesion resulting from the recovery
of the native supramolecular interactions after saponification.
Figure 6
Mechanical
properties of dried nanopapers of C6SA-CNF (yellow profile
and shading) and nat-CNF (gray profile and shading)
(A). Representative stress–strain curves for the samples indicate
the recovery of the native, interfibrillar cohesion of nat-CNF (B). The schematic figures in B illustrate the possible nanofibers
surface structure of C6SA-CNF and nat-CNF.
Mechanical
properties of dried nanopapers of C6SA-CNF (yellow profile
and shading) and nat-CNF (gray profile and shading)
(A). Representative stress–strain curves for the samples indicate
the recovery of the native, interfibrillar cohesion of nat-CNF (B). The schematic figures in B illustrate the possible nanofibers
surface structure of C6SA-CNF and nat-CNF.The here-prepared nat-CNF showed
a Young’s
modulus (19 GPa) significantly higher than the moduli of nanopapers
prepared from TEMPO-oxidized CNFs (≤10 GPa)[27−29] or from mechanically
fibrillated cellulose nanofibers (≤13.4 GPa).[30,31] The tensile strength of nat-CNF, in comparison
to reference materials, is moderately high.[27,30] Considering the relatively low apparent density, 1.31 g cm3 (relative porosity of 16%) (Table S3),
the specific tensile strength of nat-CNF is in the
range of those of high-strength nanopapers. This suggests that the
restored cellulose–cellulose interactions induce stronger cohesive
forces, although they were not specifically optimized in the material
formed herein. We expect that the mechanical performance can be further
enhanced by densification of the nanopaper or with improved long-range
order, i.e., with increased coherence between the fibrils.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have shown that the presented
regioselective
succinylation approach enables complete isolation of elementary cellulose
fibrils from wood pulp fibers, without compromising their crystalline
structure and degree of polymerization. This contrasts with nanocellulose
preparation methods based on oxidative treatments, such as the TEMPO-mediated
and periodate oxidation. It is noteworthy that these chemical approaches
are quite distinct, so that their efficiency may differ when applied
to different biomasses, e.g., never-dried vs dried pulps. Moreover,
we showed that the proposed modification enabled complete surface
esterification of the available primary hydroxyl groups of the elementary
fibril, i.e., full surface coverage, and thereby fibrillation into
elementary nanofibrils. The resulting nanofibril dispersions could
be processed using conventional approaches while allowing recovery
of the native supramolecular interactions by a subsequent mild hydrolysis
(saponification), which removed the succinate groups. The reversibility
of the proposed functionalization enables structures composed of elementary
nanofibrils exhibiting their native characteristics, which can help
overcome the current limitations in mechanical performance of nanocelluloses.Other implications can be foreseen from these “native”
nanofibrils, such as optimized interactions with other plant-based
polymers, e.g., hemicelluloses. Structures composed
of native elementary cellulose fibrils, made available by our approaches,
are expected to advance the developments and implementation of materials
from sustainable building blocks. We expect that the introduced methods
will push the upper strength boundaries of nanocelluloses and that
their implementation will result in a wider range of high-end materials.
Experimental Section
Materials
Cellulose fibers of high purity were provided
as never-dried bleached beech sulfite dissolving pulp (50 wt % solid
content) by Lenzing AG (Lenzing, Austria) and used in the production
of the modified pulp sample (C6SA-cellulose). All chemicals were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck Life Science OY, Finland) at a minimum purity
of 99% and were used as received.
Preparation of Regioselectively
Succinylated Cellulose Nanofibrils
(C6SA-CNFs)
Never-dried cellulose fibers (20.0 g wet mass,
10 g dry mass, 61.7 mmol, 50 wt % solid content) was transferred into
a flask. In a separate container, 30.8 mL of a 3 M solution of imidazole
(6.30 g, 92.5 mmol, 1.5 molar equiv) in acetone was stirred with 61.7
mL of a 1 M succinic anhydride solution (6.17 g, 61.7 mmol, 1.0 molar
equiv) in acetone for 10 min. Afterward this mixture was added to
the cellulose fibers and mixed by stirring with a glass rod for 1
min. The container was closed and heated in an oven at 40 °C
for 6.25 h. The reaction was stopped through addition of a saturated
aqeuous solution of NaHCO3 and 30 min equilibration.
To remove the unreacted SA and the imidazole from the cellulose, the
pulp was washed by filtration with deionized water. The cellulose
fibers were suspended in deionized water at 0.25 wt % solid content
with a blender. The C6SA-cellulose suspension was fibrillated in a
high-pressure homogenizer, Gaulin APV-1000 from AxFlow GesmbH (Premstätten,
Austria). The homogenization of the fibers was done in five passes
at a pressure of approximately 800 bar to yield a highly viscous and
transparent dispersion of C6SA-CNF, which was stored at 8 °C.
Further experimental details are given in the Supporting Information.
Authors: Alistair W T King; Valtteri Mäkelä; Stephanie A Kedzior; Tiina Laaksonen; Gabriel J Partl; Sami Heikkinen; Harri Koskela; Harri A Heikkinen; Ashley J Holding; Emily D Cranston; Ilkka Kilpeläinen Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Blaise L Tardy; Bruno D Mattos; Caio G Otoni; Marco Beaumont; Johanna Majoinen; Tero Kämäräinen; Orlando J Rojas Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 72.087
Authors: Tetyana Koso; Marco Beaumont; Blaise L Tardy; Daniel Rico Del Cerro; Samuel Eyley; Wim Thielemans; Orlando J Rojas; Ilkka Kilpeläinen; Alistair W T King Journal: Green Chem Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 11.034