Literature DB >> 35920888

Nationwide outcomes of incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy versus cholecystectomy alone in children: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Carlos Theodore Huerta1, Andrew Sundin1, Antoine J Ribieras1, Rebecca Saberi1, Walter Ramsey1, Gareth Gilna1, Hallie J Quiroz1, Chad M Thorson1,2, Juan E Sola1,2, Eduardo A Perez3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of incidental appendectomy, appendectomy during another index surgery in the absence of appendicitis, has not been evaluated in the pediatric population during cholecystectomy. This study sought to compare nationwide outcomes after cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy in children.
METHODS: Patients ≤ 18 years old who underwent cholecystectomy from 2010-2014 were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. A propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA) with > 40 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization factors was performed between those receiving cholecystectomy alone versus incidental appendectomy at the time of cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: 34,390 patients underwent cholecystectomy (median age 15 [13-17] years). Laparoscopic (92%) approach was utilized most frequently, with 2% requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy. PSMA demonstrated a higher frequency of perforation or laceration of adjacent organs occurring in those receiving cholecystectomy alone during index admission. No significant differences in readmissions within 30 days or the calendar year were detected. Those undergoing cholecystectomy alone had higher overall readmission costs ($11,783 [$4942-$39,836] vs. $6,100 [$2358-$19,719] cholecystectomy with appendectomy; p = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: This nationwide PSMA indicates that incidental appendectomy in pediatric cholecystectomies is not associated with higher postoperative complications, cost, or readmissions. This suggests that incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy is safe, cost-effective, and worthy of future study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendectomy; Cholecystectomy; Incidental appendectomy; Nationwide readmissions; Propensity score-matched analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35920888     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05172-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   2.003


  21 in total

1.  Rationale of incidental appendectomy.

Authors:  M A Silvert; E M Meares
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Comparative analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Afif N Kulaylat; Holden Richards; Keigo Yada; David Coyle; Rita Shelby; Amanda J Onwuka; Jennifer H Aldrink; Karen A Diefenbach; Marc P Michalsky
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic appendectomy: a Markov model.

Authors:  Karina Newhall; Benjamin Albright; Anna Tosteson; Elissa Ozanne; Thadeus Trus; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications of pediatric cholecystectomy: impact from hospital experience and use of cholangiography.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Adrian Dokey; Howard C Jen; Stephen B Shew
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Synchronous splenectomy during cholecystectomy for hereditary spherocytosis: is it really necessary?

Authors:  Raaj K Ruparel; James N Bogert; Christopher R Moir; Michael B Ishitani; Shakila P Khan; Vilmarie Rodriguez; Abdalla E Zarroug
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Pediatric incidental appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  James M Healy; Lena F Olgun; Adam B Hittelman; Doruk Ozgediz; Michael G Caty
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Laparoscopic splenectomy and/or cholecystectomy for children with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Abdulla Alwabari; Lalit Parida; Ahmed Hassan Al-Salem
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Incidental appendectomy: 18-year pathologic survey and cost effectiveness in the nonmanaged-care setting.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Albright; G Peter Fakhre; William W Nields; Philip P Metzger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Systematic review of clinical outcomes after prophylactic surgery.

Authors:  C R Davis; Aej Trevatt; A Dixit; V Datta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Incidental appendectomy--yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature.

Authors:  T E Snyder; J R Selanders
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.