Karina Newhall1,2, Benjamin Albright3, Anna Tosteson4,5, Elissa Ozanne5, Thadeus Trus6, Philip P Goodney7,8. 1. VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA. Karina.A.Newhall@hitcock.org. 2. Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, USA. Karina.A.Newhall@hitcock.org. 3. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 5. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, USA. 7. VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA. 8. Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery performed in the USA. Removal of a non-inflamed appendix during unrelated abdominal surgery (prophylactic or incidental appendectomy) can prevent the downstream risks and costs of appendicitis. It is unknown whether such a strategy could be cost saving for the health system. METHODS: We considered hypothetical patient cohorts of varying ages from 18 to 80, undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures. A Markov decision model using cost per life-year as the main outcome measure was constructed to simulate the trade-off between cost and risk of prophylactic appendectomy and the ongoing risk of developing appendicitis, with downstream costs and risks. Rates, probabilities, and costs of disease, treatment, and outcomes by patient age and gender were extracted from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complications and costs of prophylactic appendectomy. RESULTS: With our base-case assumptions, including added cost of prophylactic appendectomy of $660, we find that prophylactic removal of the appendix is cost saving for males aged 18-27 and females aged 18-28 undergoing elective surgery. The margin of cost savings depends on remaining life-years and increases exponentially with age: a 20-year-old female undergoing elective surgery could save $130 over a lifetime by undergoing prophylactic appendectomy, while a 40-year-old female would lose $130 over a lifetime. When the risk of the prophylactic appendectomy exceeds the risk of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis or the cost exceeds $1080, it becomes more cost saving to forego the prophylactic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic appendectomy can be cost saving for patients younger than age thirty undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures.
BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery performed in the USA. Removal of a non-inflamed appendix during unrelated abdominal surgery (prophylactic or incidental appendectomy) can prevent the downstream risks and costs of appendicitis. It is unknown whether such a strategy could be cost saving for the health system. METHODS: We considered hypothetical patient cohorts of varying ages from 18 to 80, undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures. A Markov decision model using cost per life-year as the main outcome measure was constructed to simulate the trade-off between cost and risk of prophylactic appendectomy and the ongoing risk of developing appendicitis, with downstream costs and risks. Rates, probabilities, and costs of disease, treatment, and outcomes by patient age and gender were extracted from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complications and costs of prophylactic appendectomy. RESULTS: With our base-case assumptions, including added cost of prophylactic appendectomy of $660, we find that prophylactic removal of the appendix is cost saving for males aged 18-27 and females aged 18-28 undergoing elective surgery. The margin of cost savings depends on remaining life-years and increases exponentially with age: a 20-year-old female undergoing elective surgery could save $130 over a lifetime by undergoing prophylactic appendectomy, while a 40-year-old female would lose $130 over a lifetime. When the risk of the prophylactic appendectomy exceeds the risk of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis or the cost exceeds $1080, it becomes more cost saving to forego the prophylactic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic appendectomy can be cost saving for patients younger than age thirty undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures.
Authors: K H Long; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; E R Helgeson; W S Harmsen; C D Smith; D M Ilstrup; Y Baerga-Varela; M G Sarr Journal: Surgery Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Christy Pearce; Carlos Torres; Shawn Stallings; David Adair; Joseph Kipikasa; Christian Briery; Edward Fody Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: James M DeCou; Michael W L Gauderer; John T Boyle; Julie A Green; Randel S Abrams Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2004-01-24 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Carlos Theodore Huerta; Andrew Sundin; Antoine J Ribieras; Rebecca Saberi; Walter Ramsey; Gareth Gilna; Hallie J Quiroz; Chad M Thorson; Juan E Sola; Eduardo A Perez Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 2.003