Literature DB >> 27023639

Systematic review of clinical outcomes after prophylactic surgery.

C R Davis1, Aej Trevatt1, A Dixit1, V Datta1.   

Abstract

Introduction Prophylactic appendicectomy is performed prior to military, polar and space expeditions to prevent acute appendicitis in the field. However, the risk-benefit ratio of prophylactic surgery is controversial. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence for prophylactic appendicectomy. It is supplemented by a clinical example of prophylactic surgery resulting in life-threatening complications. Methods A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE(®) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Keyword variants of 'prophylaxis' and 'appendicectomy' were combined to identify potential papers for inclusion. Papers related to prophylactic appendicectomy risks and benefits were reviewed. Results Overall, 511 papers were identified, with 37 papers satisfying the inclusion criteria. Nine reported outcomes after incidental appendicectomy during concurrent surgical procedures. No papers focused explicitly on prophylactic appendicectomy in asymptomatic patients. The clinical example outlined acute obstruction secondary to adhesions from a prophylactic appendicectomy. Complications after elective appendicectomy versus the natural history of acute appendicitis in scenarios such as polar expeditions or covert operations suggest prophylactic appendicectomy may be appropriate prior to extreme situations. Nevertheless, the long-term risk of adhesion related complications render prophylactic appendicectomy feasible only when the short-term risk of acute appendicitis outweighs the long-term risks of surgery. Conclusions Prophylactic appendicectomy is rarely performed and not without risk. This is the first documented evidence of long-term complications following prophylactic appendicectomy. Surgery should be considered on an individual basis by balancing the risks of acute appendicitis in the field with the potential consequences of an otherwise unnecessary surgical procedure in a healthy patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicectomy; Appendicitis; Complications; Prophylactic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023639      PMCID: PMC5209958          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  21 in total

1.  Incidental appendectomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Ferzli; G Ozuner; M R Castellano
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-08

Review 2.  Nonoperative treatment of suspected appendicitis in remote medical care environments: implications for future spaceflight medical care.

Authors:  Mark R Campbell; Smith L Johnston; Tom Marshburn; John Kane; Desmond Lugg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Prophylactic surgery prior to extended-duration space flight: is the benefit worth the risk?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; David R Williams; Jeffrey A Jones; J D Polk; James M Vanderploeg; Mark A Talamini; Mark R Campbell; Timothy J Broderick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Appendectomy at cesarean section: a prospective study.

Authors:  A K Parsons; M V Sauer; M T Parsons; J Tunca; W N Spellacy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy: effect of incidental appendicectomy.

Authors:  A V Pollock; M Evans
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-01-01

6.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

7.  Safety of incidental appendectomy.

Authors:  P R Strom; M L Turkleson; H H Stone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Omran; Muhammad Mamdani; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  257 incidental appendectomies during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Deidre T Fisher; Michael S O'Holleran
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nationwide outcomes of incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy versus cholecystectomy alone in children: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Theodore Huerta; Andrew Sundin; Antoine J Ribieras; Rebecca Saberi; Walter Ramsey; Gareth Gilna; Hallie J Quiroz; Chad M Thorson; Juan E Sola; Eduardo A Perez
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.003

2.  Incidental Prophylactic Appendectomy Is Associated with a Profound Microbial Dysbiosis in the Long-Term.

Authors:  Lidia Sánchez-Alcoholado; José Carlos Fernández-García; Carolina Gutiérrez-Repiso; M Rosa Bernal-López; Luis Ocaña-Wilhelmi; Eduardo García-Fuentes; Isabel Moreno-Indias; Francisco J Tinahones
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.