Literature DB >> 35915845

Outcomes of Canceled Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Due to Nonvisualization.

Kelly S Myers1, Eniola T Oluyemi1, Lisa A Mullen1, Babita Panigrahi1, Philip A Di Carlo1, Derek L Nguyen1, Emily B Ambinder1.   

Abstract

Objective: Architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate is an indication for digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-VAB). However, when the finding is not visualized on the day of biopsy, the procedure is canceled. This study reports the outcomes of canceled DBT-VAB of architectural distortion due to nonvisualization.
Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, chart review was performed to identify DBT-VABs of architectural distortion at our institution between June 1, 2017, and November 1, 2020, that were canceled because of nonvisualization at the time of biopsy. Cases without follow-up imaging were excluded. Statistical analysis, including the frequency of cases yielding malignancy by the end of the study period, was performed.
Results: In total, 7.2% (39/544) of architectural distortions recommended for biopsy during the study period were canceled because of nonvisualization, 30 of which had follow-up imaging and were included in the study. Mean patient age was 56 years (standard deviation [SD], 9.6 years) and mean follow-up time was 26.7 months (SD, 11.2 months; range, 8.4-50.9 months). During the follow-up period, 16.7% (5/30) underwent repeat biopsy attempt, with one malignant result (1/30, 3.3%; SD, 18%; 95% confidence interval: 0.6%-16.7%). In total, 86.7% (26/30) of cases were declared benign during the follow-up period and 10% (3/30) remained stable with a BI-RADS 3 assessment category.
Conclusion: During available follow-up, there was a low likelihood that distortions not visualized at the time of DBT-VAB represented malignancy (3.3%, 1/30). While this low malignancy rate is reassuring, imaging follow-up is warranted. © Society of Breast Imaging 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  architectural distortion; breast biopsy; digital breast tomosynthesis; guided biopsy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35915845      PMCID: PMC9334780          DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Imaging        ISSN: 2631-6110


  22 in total

1.  Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.

Authors:  Akshat C Pujara; Jamie Hui; Lilian C Wang
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Breast MRI biopsy cancellation due to lesion nonvisualization.

Authors:  Emily B Ambinder; Kelly S Myers; Lisa A Mullen; Philip Di Carlo; Mary Philip; Roberto Fragomeni; Derek Nguyen; Eniola Oluyemi
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Michelle E Naylor; Heidi E Kosiorek; Yania M Lopez-Alvarez; Adrian M Miller; Victor J Pizzitola; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Matthew Covington; Victor J Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Marina Giurescu; William Eversman; John Lewin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Breast MRI used as a problem-solving tool reliably excludes malignancy.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Dieter H M Szolar; Klaus W Preidler; Manfred Tillich; Pia Reittner; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Cancellation of MR imaging-guided breast biopsy due to lesion nonvisualization: frequency and follow-up.

Authors:  Sandra B Brennan; Janice S Sung; D David Dershaw; Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The utility of breast MRI as a problem-solving tool.

Authors:  Edwin J Yau; Robert L Gutierrez; Wendy B DeMartini; Peter R Eby; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected.

Authors:  Shimaa Abdalla Ahmed; Marwa Samy; Ahmed M Ali; Ramy A Hassan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings?

Authors:  Linda Moy; Kristin Elias; Vashali Patel; Jiyon Lee; James S Babb; Hildegard K Toth; Cecilia L Mercado
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be?

Authors:  Pelin Seher Oztekin; Pinar Nercis Kosar
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.