Literature DB >> 21852565

Cancellation of MR imaging-guided breast biopsy due to lesion nonvisualization: frequency and follow-up.

Sandra B Brennan1, Janice S Sung, D David Dershaw, Laura Liberman, Elizabeth A Morris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the rate of canceled magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided breast biopsies due to nonvisualization of the lesion and to assess associated features and outcome data for these cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the institutional review board, a HIPAA-compliant retrospective review, in which the requirement for informed consent was waived, was performed for 907 patients scheduled for MR imaging-guided breast biopsy from 2004 to 2008. In 70 patients, MR imaging biopsy was canceled due to lesion nonvisualization. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to identify patient, parenchymal, lesion features and outcome data. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.
RESULTS: Cancellation of MR-guided biopsy due to lesion nonvisualization occurred in 8% (70 of 907) of patients and in 8% (74 of 911) of lesions. Factors associated with a significantly higher cancellation rate included marked and moderate versus mild and minimal background parenchymal enhancement (38 of 316 [12%] vs 32 of 591 [5%], P = .001), extremely and heterogeneously dense versus scattered fibroglandular densities and fatty parenchymal volume (64 of 712 [9%] vs six of 195 [3%], P = .006), and lesions 1 cm or less in size (52 of 520 [10%] vs 22 of 391 [6%], P = .02).The rate of cancellation per year was highest in the first year, with a decrease in subsequent years (14 of 102 [14%] vs 56 of 805 [7%], P = .025). A significantly lower rate was found in women with synchronous breast cancer (nine of 240 [4%] vs 61 of 667 [9%], P = .007), and a significantly higher rate was found in women with a history of cancer (35 of 315 [11%] vs 35 of 592 [6%], P = .01). Among 58 women who had MR imaging follow-up, no cancers were identified. Among three women who underwent mastectomy after cancellation, one had ductal carcinoma in situ in the same quadrant as the MR-depicted lesion. The cancer detection rate among 61 women who underwent either MR imaging or pathologic follow-up was 2% (one of 61) (95% CI: 0.4%, 9%).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided breast biopsy was canceled due to lesion nonvisualization in 8% of the patients. Although the cancer detection rate among the lesions for which biopsy was canceled is low (95% CI: 0%, 9%), short-term follow-up MR imaging is prudent. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852565     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11100720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Luca A Carbonaro; Martina Pancot; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Zanotel; Viviana Londero; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Rhea D Chitalia; Despina Kontos; Linda Moy; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.

Authors:  R Alcantara; V Iotti; M Posso; M Pitarch; N Arenas; B Ejarque; G Besutti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Outcomes of Canceled Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Due to Nonvisualization.

Authors:  Kelly S Myers; Eniola T Oluyemi; Lisa A Mullen; Babita Panigrahi; Philip A Di Carlo; Derek L Nguyen; Emily B Ambinder
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience of a single tertiary referral cancer centre and prospects for the future.

Authors:  Silvia Penco; Anna Rotili; Filippo Pesapane; Chiara Trentin; Valeria Dominelli; Angela Faggian; Mariagiorgia Farina; Irene Marinucci; Anna Bozzini; Maria Pizzamiglio; Anna Maria Ierardi; Enrico Cassano
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Patient outcomes in canceled MRI-guided breast biopsies.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Janie M Lee; Christopher Johansen; Elkan F Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience and preliminary results of 205 procedures.

Authors:  Gracy de Almeida Coutinho Carneiro; Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira; Flávia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes; Maria Julia Gregorio Calas
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

9.  Amount of fibroglandular tissue FGT and background parenchymal enhancement BPE in relation to breast cancer risk and false positives in a breast MRI screening program : A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Suzan Vreemann; Mehmet U Dalmis; Peter Bult; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Clinical Application and Feasibility of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy of Breast Minimal Lesions in Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Ying Song; Jiaqi Liu; Xiangzhi Meng; Zeyu Xing; Menglu Zhang; Feng Ye; Xin Wang; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.