Literature DB >> 35913567

Blood pressure monitoring following kidney transplantation in children: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive measurements using Doppler as a benchmark technique.

Eytan Kaplan1,2, Gili Kadmon3,4, Elhanan Nahum3,4, Hadas Alfandary4,5, Orly Haskin4,5, Avichai Weissbach3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring following pediatric kidney transplantation is essential for optimizing graft perfusion. Differences between invasive BP and noninvasive BP (NIBP) measurements are sometimes considerable. We aimed to assess agreement between invasive BP and NIBP in pediatric patients after kidney transplantation and compare with measurements obtained by systolic Doppler with manual sphygmomanometer as a reference technique.
METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study, of children aged 18 years or younger, admitted immediately following kidney transplantation to the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center, between May 2019 and June 2021.
RESULTS: Eighty-two paired simultaneous measurements of invasive BP, NIBP, and Doppler BP in 18 patients were compared. Patients were significantly hypertensive, with mean systolic NIBP above the 95th percentile (96 ± 6%). Systolic invasive BP measurements were significantly higher than NIBP (149 ± 20 vs. 136 ± 15 mmHg, p < 0.001). Substantial differences (≥ 20 mmHg) were found in 23% (95% CI 15-34%). Similar disagreement was found between systolic invasive and Doppler BP (150 ± 23 and 137 ± 17 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.001). In contrast, systolic NIBP was in good agreement with Doppler BP (135 ± 17 and 138 ± 18, respectively, p = 0.27). A moderate to strong correlation was found between higher systolic invasive BP and the difference to systolic Doppler BP (Spearman's ρ = 0.63, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In children immediately following kidney transplantation, clinically significant disagreement was found between invasive and noninvasive BP measurements. Invasive BP values were significantly higher than those obtained by Doppler. Better agreement was found between NIBP and Doppler. These issues should be considered when interpreting BP measurements in this sensitive patient population. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Pediatric Nephrology Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure Monitoring; Hypertension; Kidney transplantation; Pediatric intensive care

Year:  2022        PMID: 35913567     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05691-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.651


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of non-invasive vs invasive blood pressure measurement in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  J Zhou; O Elkhateeb; K-S Lee
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Results of a survey of blood pressure monitoring by intensivists in critically ill patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Arjun Chatterjee; Kirk DePriest; Russell Blair; David Bowton; Robert Chin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Comparison between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill premature infants.

Authors:  Sahin Takci; Sule Yigit; Ayse Korkmaz; Murat Yurdakök
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.299

4.  Which pressure to believe? A comparison of direct arterial with indirect blood pressure measurement techniques in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Tanya R Holt; Davinia E Withington; Ellen Mitchell
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Correlation between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in severely burned children.

Authors:  Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Victoria G Rontoyanni; Guillermo Foncerrada; Anthony Nguyen; Karel D Capek; Paul Wurzer; Jong O Lee; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Charles D Voigt; Ludwik K Branski; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Comparing oscillometric noninvasive and invasive intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring in term neonates under general anesthesia: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Tasuku Fujii; Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Methods of blood pressure measurement in the ICU.

Authors:  Li-wei H Lehman; Mohammed Saeed; Daniel Talmor; Roger Mark; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Blood Pressure in Critically Ill Children: Exploratory Analyses of Concurrent Invasive and Noninvasive Measurements.

Authors:  Andrew Goodwin; Mjaye L Mazwi; Jonathan Somer; Steven M Schwartz; Alistair McEwan; Danny Eytan
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-12-02

9.  Oscillometric versus invasive blood pressure measurement in patients with shock: a prospective observational study in the emergency department.

Authors:  Agnes S Meidert; Michael E Dolch; Konstanze Mühlbauer; Bernhard Zwissler; Matthias Klein; Josef Briegel; Stephan Czerner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.