| Literature DB >> 35909489 |
Peng Zhang1, Jiekai Ye1, Lixia Huang1, Xiaozhang Ying1, Bo Zhu1, Yanghui Jin1, Jun Fei1, Shiyuan Shi1, Qi Zheng1.
Abstract
Purpose: This study is aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and pedicle screw (PS) fixation of the affected vertebrae in lumbar tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909489 PMCID: PMC9334104 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6312994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Patient baseline data.
| CBT group ( | PS group ( | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 15/12 | 14/11 | 0.984 (0.747 to 1.295) | 0.974 |
| Age (mean) | 51.8 ± 9.9 | 52.6 ± 9.7 | 1.005 (0.938 to 1.076) | 0.752 |
| Number of affected segments | 0.923 | |||
| Single segment | 14 | 13 | ||
| Double segments | 10 | 10 | ||
| Triple segments | 3 | 2 |
CBT: cortical bone trajectory; PS: pedicle screw; M: male; F: female.
Comparison between groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bone fusion time, and follow-up.
| CBT group | PS group | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time (min) | 222.0 ± 12.1 | 229.0 ± 13.7 | 1.055 (0.998 to 1.114) | 0.056 |
| Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | 289.7 ± 51.2 | 303.2 ± 34.7 | 1.010 (0.995 to 1.025) | 0.294 |
| Bone fusion time (mo) | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 0.9 | 2.084 (0.911 to 4.769) | 0.104 |
| Follow-up (mo) | 40.2 ± 5.8 | 41.4 ± 4.2 | 1.067 (0.909 to 1.253) | 0.394 |
CBT: cortical bone trajectory; PS: pedicle screw; min: minute; mo: month.
Figure 1Curves of the mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for incision pain in the groups (a) and VAS for leg pain in the groups (b). Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more intense pain. VAS showed a significant difference between the two groups in VAS scores for incision pain at the 1st day and 3rd day after surgery. The data are shown as the average ± SD. ∗p < 0.05.
Comparison of preoperation and final follow-up JOA scores for the CBT group and PS group.
| CBT group | PS group | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperation | 10.6 ± 1.9 | 10.7 ± 2.3 | 0.933 (0.641 to 1.358) | 0.830 |
| Final follow-up | 25.9 ± 0.9 | 25.4 ± 1.2 | 0.646 (0.338 to 1.233) | 0.098 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 |
CBT: cortical bone trajectory; PS: pedicle screw.
Figure 2A 54-year-old woman had lumbar 2-3 bone destruction. Her preoperative anteroposterior radiograph and CT show (a–d) that the bone destruction involved three columns. This case was treated with affected-vertebra fixation through the combined approaches including posterior CBT screw fixation and anterior debridement and bone grafting (e, f). Follow-up anteroposterior radiograph after 41 months shows good bone union (g–i). The clinical outcome was excellent.
Figure 3A 64-year-old woman had lumbar 4-5 bone destruction. Her preoperative anteroposterior radiograph and CT show (a–d) that the bone destruction involved three columns. This case was treated with affected-vertebra fixation through the combined approaches including posterior PS screw fixation and anterior debridement and bone grafting (e, f). Follow-up anteroposterior radiograph after 37 months shows good bone union (g–i). The clinical outcome was excellent.