| Literature DB >> 35908795 |
Dejun Chen1,2, Siqian Wang3, Yuxing He1,2, Yue Fu1,2, Feijun Zhao1,2, Xiuping Zhou4, Haoquan Yin5, Jia Wan5, Yunting Huang5, Yimou Wu1,2, Longgu Cao6, Tiebing Zeng1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To discover novel serodiagnostic candidates for the serological diagnosis of syphilis.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Treponema pallidumzzm321990; ELISA; Tp0100; Tp1016; recombinant protein; serodiagnosis; syphilis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35908795 PMCID: PMC9459255 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 3.124
FIGURE 1SDS‐PAGE analysis of the expression and purification of recombinant proteins. (A, B) Tp0100 (22 kDa); (C, D) Tp1016 (39 kDa). I, induced with IPTG; M, molecular mass markers; N, noninduced; P, purification.
FIGURE 2Western blotting identification of recombinant proteins Tp0100 and Tp1016 with sera from normal rabbits (1), sera from uninfected human (2), anti‐His monoclonal antibody (3), sera from T. pallidum‐infected rabbits (4), and sera from patients with secondary syphilis (5).
Comparison of sensitivity between recombinant protein‐based ELISAs and LICA Syphilis TP at diverse phases of syphilis
| Protein and sera | IgG (ELISAs) or IgG + IgM (LICA test) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Sensitivity (%) | |
| Tp0100 | |||
| Primary syphilis | 19 | 2 | 90.5 |
| Secondary syphilis | 77 | 1 | 98.7 |
| Latent syphilis | 216 | 12 | 94.7 |
| Tertiary syphilis | 13 | 0 | 100 |
| All | 325 | 15 | 95.6 |
| Tp1016 | |||
| Primary syphilis | 13 | 8 | 61.9 |
| Secondary syphilis | 54 | 24 | 69.2 |
| Latent syphilis | 178 | 50 | 78.1 |
| Tertiary syphilis | 10 | 3 | 76.9 |
| All | 255 | 85 | 75.0 |
| LICA Syphilis TP | |||
| Primary syphilis | 20 | 1 | 95.2 |
| Secondary syphilis | 78 | 0 | 100 |
| Latent syphilis | 221 | 7 | 96.9 |
| Tertiary syphilis | 13 | 0 | 100 |
| All | 332 | 8 | 97.6 |
Comparison of specificity between recombinant protein‐based ELISAs and LICA Syphilis TP in healthy controls and individuals with potentially cross‐reactive infections
| Protein and sera | IgG (ELISAs) or IgG + IgM (LICA test) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Specificity (%) | |
| Tp0100 | |||
| Healthy controls | 1 | 59 | 98.3 |
| Leptospirosis | 1 | 23 | 95.8 |
| Lyme disease | 1 | 19 | 95.0 |
| Hepatitis B | 1 | 55 | 98.2 |
| Tuberculosis | 1 | 19 | 95.0 |
| RA | 0 | 40 | 100 |
| SLE | 0 | 40 | 100 |
| All | 5 | 255 | 98.1 |
| Tp1016 | |||
| Healthy controls | 7 | 53 | 88.3 |
| Leptospirosis | 4 | 20 | 83.3 |
| Lyme disease | 6 | 14 | 70.0 |
| Hepatitis B | 18 | 38 | 67.9 |
| Tuberculosis | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| RA | 10 | 30 | 75.0 |
| SLE | 6 | 34 | 85.0 |
| All | 53 | 207 | 79.6 |
| LICA Syphilis TP | |||
| Healthy controls | 2 | 58 | 96.7 |
| Leptospirosis | 2 | 22 | 91.7 |
| Lyme disease | 2 | 18 | 90.0 |
| Hepatitis B | 2 | 54 | 96.4 |
| Tuberculosis | 1 | 19 | 95.0 |
| RA | 0 | 40 | 100 |
| SLE | 1 | 39 | 97.5 |
| All | 10 | 250 | 96.2 |
Direct comparison of recombinant protein‐based IgG ELISAs and LICA Syphilis TP to clinical diagnosis
| Assay | Clinical diagnosis (gold standard) | Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) | Specificity (%) (95% CI) | Agreement (%) (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |||||
| Tp0100 | ||||||
| Positive | 325 | 5 | 95.6 (92.8–97.3) | 98.1 (95.6–99.2) | 96.7 (95.6–97.8) | 0.93 |
| Negative | 15 | 255 | ||||
| Tp1016 | ||||||
| Positive | 255 | 53 | 75.0 (70.1–79.3) | 79.6 (74.3–84.1) | 77.0 (74.3–79.7) | 0.54 |
| Negative | 85 | 207 | ||||
| LICA Syphilis TP | ||||||
| Positive | 332 | 10 | 97.6 (95.4–98.8) | 96.2 (93.1–97.9) | 97.0 (96.0–98.0) | 0.94 |
| Negative | 8 | 250 | ||||