| Literature DB >> 35907038 |
Jinhee Kim1,2, So Young Baek3, Stephen H Schlecht4, Mélanie L Beaulieu5, Lindsay Bussau6, Junjie Chen2, James A Ashton-Miller7, Edward M Wojtys8, Mark M Banaszak Holl9.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Certain types of repetitive sub-maximal knee loading cause microfatigue damage in the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) that can accumulate to produce macroscopic tissue failure. However, monitoring the progression of that ACL microfatigue damage as a function of loading cycles has not been reported. To explore the fatigue process, a confocal laser endomicroscope (CLEM) was employed to capture sub-micron resolution fluorescence images of the tissue in situ. The goal of this study was to quantify the in situ changes in ACL autofluorescence (AF) signal intensity and collagen microstructure as a function of the number of loading cycles.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Collagen autofluorescence; Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Microfatigue damage; Non-contact ACL injuries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35907038 PMCID: PMC9339057 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00507-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Orthop ISSN: 2197-1153
Fig. 1Paired knees (A – D) and single knees (E – F) experiment scheme. A Random selection of one of the paired knees for mechanical fatigue testing; B Custom in vitro loading apparatus to deliver 100 consecutive simulated sub-maximal jump landing knee loading cycles in order to repetitively strain the ACL using a weight (W) drop to apply impulsive knee compression along with an internal tibial moment via torsional device (T) activation, and quadriceps (Q), hamstring (H) and gastrocnemius (G) muscle forces. Diagram modified from Oh et al. [24]; C Extraction of ACL with trephine drill results in a femur bone (B) – ACL (L) explant followed by cryosection; D Benchtop confocal multiphoton microscopy for AF and SHG imaging of ACL sections; E Single knee undergoes two 33 consecutive cycles and one time 34 consecutive cycles completing a total of 100 fatigue loading cycles with interruptions due to dual probe imaging; F Dual probe imaging using arthroscope (blue arrow) and CLEM (red arrow) through two ports for joint visualization and AF imaging respectively. CLEM set up includes the base unit, display monitor and the 4 mm diameter handheld probe attached to the base unit
Demographic information for the 10 knees
| Paired knees | Single knees | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specimen | P1 | P2 | P3a | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 |
| M | M | F | F | F | F | F | |
| 34 | 36 | 31 | 38 | 30 | 38 | 26 | |
| L | L | R | L | R | L | R | |
| 185 | 175 | – | 160 | 172 | 165 | 167 | |
| 73 | 82 | 68 | 58 | 82 | 48 | 61 | |
| 5.2 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 4.8 | |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 5 | 9 | 50 | 105 | |
3 paired (P) knees, of which one of each pair would serve as an unloaded control, and the 4 single (S) knees used for repeated measures experiments. PTS denotes lateral posterior tibial slope; M male, F female, L left, R right
aCadaver height not available
Summary of the repeated measures experimental design for each single (S) knee
| Specimen | Mechanical fatigue loading and CLEM imaging sequence |
|---|---|
| Image → 5 preloading cycles → tibial avulsion → dissect → image | |
| Image → 5 preloading cycles → 4 cycles (> 3-mm ATT) → image | |
| Image → 5 preloading cycles → image → 33 cycles → image → 45 cycles → image | |
| Image → 5 preloading cycles → 33 cycles → image → 66 cycles → image → 100 cycles → image |
ATT denotes anterior tibial translation
Fig. 2Representative images of SHG and AF images from specimen P1 using benchtop CMM and compiled paired specimen results. A Control ACL SHG, B Fatigue loaded ACL SHG, C Control ACL AF, D Fatigue loaded ACL AF, E The results of all paired knee samples P1 – P3 reported as the intensity of fatigue loaded ACL as a percentage of contralateral control ACL represented by the dashed line at 100%. All fatigue loaded ACLs displayed a reduced SHG signal intensity compared to their contralateral control, whereas the AF signal intensity was enhanced. Red dashed boxes (100 × 100 μm2) indicate regions of interest (ROI) used to quantify SHG and AF intensity
Fig. 3Representative fiber orientation distribution analysis results of SHG images of control (A-C) and fatigue loaded ACLs (E-G) from specimen P1. A SHG image of a control ACL, with the cropped ROI shown in B; C Color-coded SHG image showing orientation map of fibers; D Normalized distribution of orientation with a narrow peak with FWHM of 15°; E SHG image of a fatigue loaded ACL with the cropped ROI shown in F; G Color-coded SHG images showing orientation map of fibers; H Normalized distribution of orientation displays a dispersed bimodal distribution with a FWHM of 120°
Fig. 4Coherency coefficient of control and fatigue loaded ACL fibers in SHG images from paired knee specimens (P1 - P3). Loss of coherency in the tested ACLs (average coherency coefficient in dashed line: 0.12. ± 0.09) compared to control ACLs (average coherency coefficient in dashed line: 0.29 ± 0.15) indicates a reduction of fiber alignment from fatigue loading (P = 0.003). (solid line: median, box: 1st – 3rd Quartile range, whiskers: 5 – 95% of data, dot: outliers)
Single knee ACL specimens’ overall AF and coherency changes sustained throughout the loading cycles as detected by CLEM
| Specimen | AF and coherency results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative loading cycles a | ACL statusb | Cumulative AF change (%) | Avg. AF%/cycle | Cumulative coherencyc change | |
| 5 | Failed | 19.6**** | 3.9 | −0.18 | |
| 9 | Failed | 30.9**** | 3.4 | −0.02 | |
| 50 | Not failed | 11.5 | 0.2 | −0.23 | |
| 105 | Not failed | 35.8**** | 0.3 | 0.02 | |
aIncluding pre-loading cycles
bDetermined by cumulative ATT threshold of 3 mm sustained by ACL at the end of fatigue loading
cCoherency values range from − 1 (low) to 1 (high) to indicate degree of fiber alignment
****P < 0.0001
Fig. 5Changes in AF intensity and coherency as a function of cumulative fatigue loading cycles separated by ACL region from single knee specimens. Approximate CLEM probe placement marked by circles in the proximal (red), midsubstance (blue) and distal (green) regions in AR image (top row). Open circles indicate continuation of ACL tissue but hidden by surrounding structures. Changes in AF intensity as cumulative percentage (middle row) and coherency (bottom row) as a function of cumulative fatigue loading cycles represented by increasing circle size for every 25 loading cycles