Literature DB >> 23460331

Anterior cruciate ligament fatigue failures in knees subjected to repeated simulated pivot landings.

David B Lipps1, Edward M Wojtys, James A Ashton-Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is susceptible to fatigue failure as a result of repetitive loading or whether certain knee morphologic characteristics increase that risk. HYPOTHESES: The number of knee loading cycles required to fail an ACL by fatigue failure is unaffected by the magnitude of the external load delivered to the knee joint. Furthermore, sex, ACL cross-sectional area, and lateral tibial slope will not affect the number of loading cycles to ACL failure. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Knee pairs from 10 cadaveric donors (5 female) of similar age, height, and weight were imaged with 3-T magnetic resonance imaging to measure lateral tibial slope and ACL cross-sectional area. One knee from each pair was then subjected to repeated application of a load of 3 times body weight (3*BW), while the other knee was subjected to a 4*BW load, both involving impulsive compression force, knee flexion moment, and internal tibial torque combined with realistic trans-knee muscle forces. The resulting 3-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics and kinetics were recorded, along with ACL relative strain and quadriceps, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscle forces. The loading cycle was repeated until the ACL ruptured, a 3-mm increase in cumulative anterior tibial translation occurred, or a minimum of 50 trials was reached.
RESULTS: Eight of 10 knees failed under the 4*BW load (mean ± SD cycles to failure, 21 ± 18), while 5 of 10 knees failed under the 3*BW load (mean ± SD cycles to failure, 52 ± 10). Four knees exhibited a 3-mm increase in anterior tibial translation, 7 knees developed partial or complete visible ACL tears, and 2 knees developed complete ACL tibial avulsions. A Cox regression showed that the number of cycles to ACL failure was influenced by the simulated landing force (P = .012) and ACL cross-sectional area (P = .022). Donor sex and lateral tibial slope did not influence the number of cycles to ACL failure.
CONCLUSION: The human ACL is susceptible to fatigue failure when pivot landings of 3*BW or more load the knee repeatedly within a short time span. An ACL with a smaller cross-sectional area is at greater risk for this type of failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results show that the human knee can only withstand a certain number of 3*BW or greater jump loading cycles within a short time period before the ACL will fail. Therefore, limiting the increase in the number and severity of pivot landing maneuvers performed over a week of training would make sense from an injury prevention viewpoint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; fatigue life; morphology; pivot landing; rupture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23460331      PMCID: PMC6388619          DOI: 10.1177/0363546513477836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  30 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Cruciate ligament healing and injury prevention in the age of regenerative medicine and technostress: homeostasis revisited.

Authors:  John Nyland; Austin Huffstutler; Jeeshan Faridi; Shikha Sachdeva; Monica Nyland; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Training Load and Injury: Causal Pathways and Future Directions.

Authors:  Judd T Kalkhoven; Mark L Watsford; Aaron J Coutts; W Brent Edwards; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Femoral entheseal shape and attachment angle as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Callan M Luetkemeyer; Benjamin C Marchi; James A Ashton-Miller; Ellen M Arruda
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 5.  Optimising the 'Mid-Stage' Training and Testing Process After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Morphology of Mouse Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Complex Changes Following Exercise During Pubertal Growth.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Colin T Martin; Danielle N Ochocki; Bonnie T Nolan; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk by Season Period and Competition Segment: An Analysis of National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance Data.

Authors:  Travis Anderson; Erin B Wasserman; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Quantitative comparison of the microscopic anatomy of the human ACL femoral and tibial entheses.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Grace E Carey; Stephen H Schlecht; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Risk of anterior cruciate ligament fatigue failure is increased by limited internal femoral rotation during in vitro repeated pivot landings.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Does limited internal femoral rotation increase peak anterior cruciate ligament strain during a simulated pivot landing?

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; Youkeun K Oh; Asheesh Bedi; James A Ashton-Miller; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.