Literature DB >> 20707668

Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.

Susanne Köbler1, Ann-Cathrine Lindblad, Ake Olofsson, Björn Hagerman.   

Abstract

Bilateral amplification seems to be the best solution for bilaterally hearing-impaired persons. Nevertheless, some individuals are unsuccessful with this strategy. The goals of the present study were to develop tests to improve the diagnostic test battery before rehabilitation of hearing-impaired persons with bilateral or unilateral amplification, and to evaluate the tests with normally-hearing subjects and with two groups of hearing-impaired persons. The latter two groups contained 11 successful and 11 unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification respectively. Hearing thresholds, speech recognition in noise, signal analysis ability, binaural abilities, and dichotic tests were used in the investigation. The subjects answered a questionnaire and hearing aid gain curves were measured. The results for the two groups were similar for peripheral hearing functions and binaural performance. The unilateral amplification group showed significantly worse results in speech-in-noise and dichotic tests. Spatial aspects within the questionnaire were correlated to amplification preference. We therefore suggest the inclusion of speech-in-noise, dichotic tests, and questions on spatial orientation into the diagnostic scheme before rehabilitation with hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707668     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.481774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  4 in total

Review 1.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

2.  The speech intelligibility benefit of a unilateral wireless system for hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Christopher G Brennan-Jones; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Fiona H Guy; Dawn L Harrison; Sharon L Suller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Speech Lang Hear       Date:  2013-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.