Literature DB >> 3589910

Progress in reconstruction after resection of the head of the pancreas.

J M Funovics, G Zöch, E Wenzl, F Schulz.   

Abstract

Fistulas of the pancreas due to dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy caused severe postoperative complications. Whereas various methods with and without anastomosis of the pancreas are recommended to deal with the pancreatic stump, mortality rates of 20 to 75 per cent have been reported. These different results prompted us to start a prospective, nonrandomized study in which three methods of reconstructing the remnant of the pancreas involving anastomosis were compared with pancreaticocutaneous drainage without anastomosis. One hundred and thirty-one patients with partial pancreaticoduodenectomy entered this trial, 54 female and 77 male patients with an average age of 55.9 years. The indications included: 42 instances of chronic pancreatitis, 44 instances of carcinoma of the pancreas and 45, periampullary carcinoma. We performed 33 end to side pancreaticojejunostomy procedures (four fistulas of the pancreas, a mortality rate of 15.0 per cent), 31 end to end anastomoses (three fistulas of the pancreas, a mortality rate of 6.5 per cent) and 48 double loops with anastomoses of the pancreatic and hepatic duct to separate jejunal loops (nine fistulas of the pancreas, a mortality rate of 2 per cent). Nineteen patients were operated upon using external drainage of the pancreatic stump by means of Penrose drains (five fistulas of the pancreas, a mortality rate of zero per cent). To reduce the fatal risks caused by combined fistulas of the pancreas and biliary tract, the use of separate intestinal loops for anastomoses of the pancreas and biliary tract offers the best solution, since no fatal complications of the pancreaticojejunostomy were observed. In contrast, pancreaticocutaneous drainage was performed upon patients with endangered pancreatic anastomoses due to local morphologic conditions, such as tender pancreatic parenchyma or thin pancreatic ducts. The total loss of exocrine function and the high morbidity rate of 37 per cent is justified in spite of the mortality rate of zero per cent. Total pancreaticoduodenectomy, for technical reasons, represents no acceptable alternative in view of higher mortality rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3589910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  15 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Jan M Langrehr; Marcus Bahra; Dietmar Jacob; Matthias Glanemann; Peter Neuhaus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  How to pass on expertise: pancreatoduodenectomy at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Peter Wamser; Anton Stift; Christian Passler; Peter Goetzinger; Thomas Sautner; Raimund Jakesz; Reinhold Fuegger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Can isolated pancreaticojejunostomy reduce pancreas fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction?

Authors:  Hasan Erdem; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Mehmet Aziret; Enver Reyhan; Alper Sözütek; Selim Sözen; Oktay İrkorucu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 4.  Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis on the continent of Europe.

Authors:  J Cuilleret; G Guillemin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effect of Billroth II or Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for the Gastrojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ji Yang; Chao Wang; Qiang Huang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Use of isolated Roux loop for pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Konstantinos Ballas; Nikolaos Symeonidis; Savvas Rafailidis; Theodoros Pavlidis; Georgios Marakis; Nikolaos Mavroudis; Athanasios Sakantamis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad Hamdy; Ahmad M Sultan; Tarek Salah; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Mohamed Said; Mostaffa Abu Zeied; Tallat Abdallah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Azhar Perwaiz; Dinesh Singhal; Amanjeet Singh; Adarsh Chaudhary
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.