| Literature DB >> 35898477 |
Qingyang Li1, Li Zhao1, Liling Zhou1, Rongju Liu1, Bo Chen1.
Abstract
In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer is one type of assisted reproductive technology, although the technology is now more mature. Many factors, however, will have an impact on oocyte fertilization, embryo growth, pregnancy outcome, and child safety due to the journey from clinical to the laboratory. The influence of degranulated cells early in fertilization on frozen embryo transfer (FET) results is investigated in this study. This article analyzes 255 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) and FET transplantation at the author's central unit from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. Among them, IVF-assisted conception is the early degranulation of homologous oocyte fertilization. Correlation analysis is performed by observing the embryonic outcome of the early degranulation group and the overnight fertilization group and the clinical outcome after FET. Through data mining analysis, the results show that the polyfertilization rate and 0PN rate for the early degranulation group are significantly higher than the overnight fertilization group (9.87% vs. 8.24% and 3.14% vs. 1.69%). In terms of normal fertilization rate, there is no significant difference between D3 high-quality embryo rate and D5 high-quality blastocyst rate (64.07% vs. 65.15%, 27.5% vs. 26.5%, and 15.97% vs. 17.35%). There is no significant difference in the complete recovery rate of embryos after thawing (93.24% vs. 93.46%), and the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, and live birth rate are not significantly different between the two groups after FET. The offspring outcomes of singletons do not differ significantly between the two groups; however, twins born early degranulate have much greater rates of ultralow birth weight and ultrapreterm children than twins born overnight fertilization (14.29% vs. 0). Therefore, it can be concluded that degranulation of cells early in fertilization is a desirable method to prevent fertilization disorders. However, under the premise of ensuring that no fertilization disorder occurs, it is not appropriate to degranulate all the oocytes of the patient at the early stage of fertilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898477 PMCID: PMC9313951 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4955287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Basic information of the patient.
| Item | Information |
|---|---|
| Number | 255 |
| Woman's age | 30.73 ± 4.5 |
| Infertility years | 4.50 ± 3.06 |
| BMI | 22.81 ± 3.41 |
| AMH | 6.06 ± 3.17 |
| FSH | 6.33 ± 1.38 |
| LH | 6.77 ± 4.3 |
| Infertility factor | - |
| Fallopian tube factor | 151 |
| Endometriosis | 4 |
| Ovulation disorder | 25 |
| Oligospermia | 53 |
| Unknown reason | 17 |
| Old age | 5 |
Comparison of embryonic developmental outcomes.
| Item | Early degranulation | Overnight fertilization |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2PN % | 64.07 (1571/2452) | 65.15 (1810/2778) | NS |
| ≥3PN % | 9.87 (242/2452) | 8.24 (229/2778) | <0.05 |
| 0PN % | 3.14 (77/2452) | 1.69 (47/2778) | <0.001 |
| D3 high-quality embryo rate | 27.50 (432/1571) | 26.52 (480/1810) | NS |
| D5 high-quality embryo rate | 15.97 (176/1102) | 17.35 (209/1204) | NS |
| D6 high-quality embryo rate | 6.72 (74/1102) | 4.65 (56/1204) | <0.05 |
Figure 1Comparison visualization of fertilization and embryo development outcome.
Comparison of cleavage stage embryo recovery rate.
| Item | Early degranulation | Overnight fertilization |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of thawed embryos | 222 | 260 | - |
| Fragments ≤ 10%embryo ratio | 95.05 (211/222) | 93.85 (244/260) | NS |
| Complete recovery rate | 93.24 (207/222) | 93.46 (223/260) | NS |
Comparison of FET clinical outcome.
| Item | ED | OF | MT |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 31.07 ± 4.5 | 30.65 ± 4.8 | 30.38 ± 4.2 | - |
| Transplanted cycle | 116 | 136 | 110 | - |
| Transplanted embryo | 168 | 205 | 222 | - |
| Average transplanted embryo | 1.45 | 1.50 | 2.03 | - |
| Planting rate | 51.19 (86/168) | 48.29 (99/205) | 47.75 (106/222) | NS |
| Clinical pregnancy rate | 66.38 (77/116) | 59.55 (81/136) | 67.27 (74/110) | NS |
| Miscarriage rate | 20.78 (16/77) | 22.22 (18/81) | 12.16 (9/74) | NS |
| Live birth rate | 52.57(61/116)a | 46.32 (63/136)ab | 59.09 (65/110)ac | <0.05 |
Figure 2Comparison visualization of FET Outcome.
Singleton birth comparison.
| Item | ED | OF | MT |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth | 54 | 50 | 42 | - |
| Average weight | 3254.63 ± 500.16 | 3277.96 ± 497.54 | 3264.05 ± 507.86 | NS |
| <1.50 | 0 | 2.0 (1/50) | 0 | NS |
| <2.50 | 3.70 (2/54) | 2.0 (1/50) | 7.14 (3/42) | NS |
| Average gestational age | 38.53 ± 2.01 | 38.89 ± 1.76 | 38.43 ± 1.94 | NS |
| <32 weeks | 1.85 (1/54) | 2.00 (1/50) | 0 | NS |
| <37 weeks | 1.85 (1/54) | 2.00 (1/50) | 9.52 (4/42) | NS |
Twin birth comparison.
| Item | ED | OF | MT |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth | 14 | 26 | 47 | - |
| Average weight | 2314.29 ± 536.16 | 2393.08 ± 338.29 | 2346.17 ± 499.52 | NS |
| <1.5 | 14.29 (2/14)ac | 0bc | 8.51 (4/47)c | <0.05 |
| <2.5 | 57.14 (8/14) | 53.85 (14/26) | 59.57 (28/47) | NS |
| Average gestational age | 35 ± 2.66 | 36.31 ± 1.67 | 35.78 ± 2.68 | NS |
| <32 weeks | 14.29 (2/14)ac | 0bc | 8.51 (4/47)c | <0.05 |
| <37 weeks | 71.43 (10/14)ab | 46.15 (12/26)b | 34.04 (16/47)bc | <0.05 |