Literature DB >> 23912477

Time of insemination culture and outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

X D Zhang1, J X Liu, W W Liu, Y Gao, W Han, S Xiong, L H Wu, G N Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Conflicting results have been reported regarding the technique of brief insemination used in IVF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine if better clinical outcomes of IVF are associated with a brief co-incubation of gametes than with a standard overnight co-incubation. METHODS A computerized search was conducted of the published literature of four databases, using search terms related to gamete, time of co-incubation and outcome measure. Eligible studies compared outcomes of IVF with a brief co-incubation of gametes to that of a control group of standard insemination and reported rates of live birth (primary outcome), normal fertilization, polyspermy, good quality embryos, implantation, clinical pregnancy or ongoing pregnancy (secondary outcomes). A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the data. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using Cochran Q and I² values. RESULTS Brief co-incubation of gametes was associated with significantly higher rates of clinical pregnancy (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.24-2.73) and ongoing pregnancy (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.27-2.33) than standard insemination. Brief co-incubation of gametes was associated also with a significantly higher rate of implantation (RR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.43-2.26) than standard insemination. However, the rates of normal fertilization (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.02), good quality embryos (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.0-1.53) and polyspermy (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.7-1.01) were not significantly different with brief co-incubation of gametes compared with standard insemination. CONCLUSIONS Reduced gamete exposure time may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Drawbacks inherent to the quality of several studies limit the quality of the available evidence. Adequately powered randomized controlled studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of brief insemination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; clinical outcomes; co-incubation of gametes; insemination time; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912477     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  10 in total

1.  Brief co-incubation of gametes benefits the outcomes of newborns.

Authors:  Ruiqi Li; Songbang Ou; Nengyong Ouyang; Lingyan Zheng; Qingxue Zhang; Dongzi Yang; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Long-time vs. short-time insemination of sibling eggs.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Xiao Zhang; Yue Yang; Junliang Zhao; Dayong Hao; Jianrui Zhang; Yanli Liu; Wenbin Wu; Xingling Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Does reducing gamete co-incubation time improve clinical outcomes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rui-Qi Li; Neng-Yong Ouyang; Song-Bang Ou; Ren-Min Ni; Mei-Qi Mai; Qing-Xue Zhang; Dong-Zi Yang; Wen-Jun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Oocyte insemination with the Walking Egg simplified IVF culture system - an investigation into reduced sperm numbers, sperm DNA fragmentation and reactive oxygen species formation.

Authors:  G M Boshoff; W Ombelet; C Huyser
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2018-12

5.  Controlled spermatozoa-oocyte interaction improves embryo quality in sheep.

Authors:  Debora Agata Anzalone; Luca Palazzese; Marta Czernik; Annalaura Sabatucci; Luca Valbonetti; Emanuele Capra; Pasqualino Loi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Time-lapse monitoring of fertilized human oocytes focused on the incidence of 0PN embryos in conventional in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kobayashi; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Kumiko Ishii; Asuka Sato; Natsuko Nakamura; Yoshiko Saito; Hisataka Hasegawa; Maki Fujita; Akira Mitsuhashi; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effect Analysis of Degranulated Cell in Early Fertilization on FET Outcome and Offspring Safety with Data Mining.

Authors:  Qingyang Li; Li Zhao; Liling Zhou; Rongju Liu; Bo Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 8.  Opportunities and Limits of Conventional IVF versus ICSI: It Is Time to Come off the Fence.

Authors:  Martina Balli; Anna Cecchele; Valerio Pisaturo; Sofia Makieva; Giorgia Carullo; Edgardo Somigliana; Alessio Paffoni; Paola Vigano'
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  A global perspective on assisted reproductive technology fertility treatment: an 8-country fertility specialist survey.

Authors:  Céline Audibert; Daniel Glass
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Comparison of embryonic competence and clinical outcomes between early and late cumulus cell removal for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Pallop Pongsuthirak
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2021-11-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.