| Literature DB >> 35896975 |
Ziyang Yu1,2, Chenxi Xu2, Ying Zhang1, Fengying Ji3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To construct a noninvasive radiomics model for evaluating the pathological degree and an individualized treatment strategy for patients with the manifestation of ground glass nodules (GGNs) on CT images.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Lung adenocarcinoma; Pulmonary nodules; Radiomics; Random forest classification
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35896975 PMCID: PMC9327229 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00862-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 2.795
Fig. 1Examples in the dataset of GGNs. The CT images and paraffin sections from left to right (haematoxylin and eosin, H&E, ×100) are AAH, AIS, MIA, and IAC, respectively
Fig. 2Workflow of radiomics
Demographic characteristics of AAH/AIS, MIA and IAC patients in the training and testing cohorts
| Characteristics (mean ± SD) | Training set (n = 168) | Testing set (n = 73) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAH/AIS | MIA | IAC | AAH/AIS | MIA | IAC | |||
| Age (years) | 44.66 ± 7.80 | 44.36 ± 7.27 | 44.17 ± 7.34 | 0.638 | 45.41 ± 7.68 | 44.88 ± 6.84 | 45.08 ± 7.32 | 0.881 |
| Gender (male/female) | 23/27 | 25/33 | 31/29 | 0.700 | 10/12 | 13/12 | 12/14 | 0.701 |
SD standard deviation
The representative radiomics features
| Radiomics features | AAH/AIS | MIA | IAC | F-value/P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum3Ddiameter | 1.82E+01 ± 1.66E+00 | 3.72E+01 ± 3.55E+00 | 5.65E+01 ± 4.07E+00 | 1.81E+03/*** |
| GLCMEntropy_angle0_offset1 | 3.72E+00 ± 2.74E+00 | 5.24E+00 ± 1.30E+00 | 1.27E+01 ± 1.76E+01 | 3.33E+02/*** |
| GLCMEntropy_angle135_offset1 | 4.90E+00 ± 6.82E−01 | 9.02E+00 ± 8.56E−01 | 1.43E+01 ± 5.75E−01 | 2.43E+03/*** |
| HaralickCorrelation_angle90_offset7 | 8.60E+08 ± 2.04E+08 | 6.35E+08 ± 2.09E+08 | 5.29E+08 ± 1.33E+08 | 4.54E+01/*** |
***p value less than 0.001
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of three radiomics models in both the training (a) and testing cohorts (b)
The diagnostic performance of the radiomic models in both the training and testing sets
| Classifier evaluation | Training set (n = 168) | Testing set (n = 73) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAH/AIS | MIA | IAC | AAH/AIS | MIA | IAC | |
| Average AUC | 0.963 | 0.940 | 0.978 | 0.955 | 0.952 | 0.926 |
| (95% CI) | (0.931,0.995) | (0.905,0.974) | (0.959,0.997) | (0.907,0.998) | (0.904,0.997) | (0.863,0.989) |
| Average balanced accuracy (%) | 0.921 | 0.893 | 0.941 | 0.935 | 0.919 | 0.903 |
| Average sensitivity (%) | 0.900 | 0.850 | 0.918 | 0.909 | 0.880 | 0.885 |
| Average specificity (%) | 0.942 | 0.936 | 0.963 | 0.961 | 0.958 | 0.915 |
AUC area under the curve
Fig. 4Summary plot of features impact on the prediction of the SVM model. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values of features in every sample
Fig. 5The distributions of representative radiomics features and the post-hoc statistics results in the three groups. *** denotes statistical significance, p < 0.001. Class 0 represents AAH/AIS; Class 1 represents MIA; and Class 2 represents IAC