| Literature DB >> 35892961 |
Verena-Maria Schmidt1, Philipp Zelger2, Claudia Woess1, Anton K Pallua3, Rohit Arora4, Gerald Degenhart5, Andrea Brunner6, Bettina Zelger6, Michael Schirmer7, Walter Rabl1, Johannes D Pallua4.
Abstract
It is challenging to estimate the post-mortem interval (PMI) of skeletal remains within a forensic context. As a result of their interactions with the environment, bones undergo several chemical and physical changes after death. So far, multiple methods have been used to follow up on post-mortem changes. There is, however, no definitive way to estimate the PMI of skeletal remains. This research aimed to propose a methodology capable of estimating the PMI using micro-computed tomography measurements of 104 human skeletal remains with PMIs between one day and 2000 years. The present study indicates that micro-computed tomography could be considered an objective and precise method of PMI evaluation in forensic medicine. The measured parameters show a significant difference regarding the PMI for Cort Porosity p < 0.001, BV/TV p > 0.001, Mean1 p > 0.001 and Mean2 p > 0.005. Using a machine learning approach, the neural network showed an accuracy of 99% for distinguishing between samples with a PMI of less than 100 years and archaeological samples.Entities:
Keywords: machine learning; micro-CT; post-mortem interval
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892961 PMCID: PMC9331256 DOI: 10.3390/biology11081105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Segmentation and quantitative analysis of the whole cortical bone (A) and 3 cylinders aligned centrally in the cortical bone around the analyzed sample (B).
Micro-CT parameters with associated abbreviations, description, and unit.
| Metric Measures | Abbreviation | Description | Standard Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone volume ratio | BV/TV | Ratio of bone volume to total volume in the ROI | % |
| Cortical Porosity | Cort Porosity | cortical volume | % |
| Trabecular number | Tb.N | Mean number of trabeculae per unit length | mm−1 |
| Trabecular thickness | Tb.Th | Mean thickness of the trabeculae | mm |
| Trabecular separation | Tb.Sp | Mean distance between trabeculae | Mm |
| Apparent density | Mean1 | Mean density of the ROI | mgHA/mm3 |
| Material density | Mean2 | Mean density of the bone fraction of the ROI | mgHA/mm3 |
Parameters are shown for the five different age classes: class 1 with PMI of 0–2 weeks, class 2 with PMI of 2 weeks–6 months, class 3 with PMI of 6 months–1 year, class 4 with PMI of 1 to 10 years, and class 5 with PMI of >100 years. The values with noticeable differences from one representative sample are presented for each class.
| Age Class | PMI | Analyzed Areas | BV/TV [%] | Cort Porosity | Tb.N [mm] | Tb.Th [mm] | Tb.Sp [mm] | Mean1 [mgHA/cm3] | Mean2 [mgHA/cm3] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–2 wk | whole cortical bone | 0.96 ± 0.10 | 0.041 ± 0.022 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.40 ± 0.65 | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 928 ± 39 | 950± 121 |
| 1 | 0–2 wk | 3 x cylinders aligned centrally | 0.95 ± 0.02 | n.a | 3.1 ± 1.0 | 0.65 ± 0.22 | 2.2 ± 1.4 | 909 ± 31 | 959 ± 15 |
| 2 | 2 wk–6 mth. | whole cortical bone | 0.97 ± 0.027 | 0.038 ± 0.028 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.54 ± 0.60 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 934 ± 41 | 967 ± 22 |
| 2 | 2 wk–6 mth. | 3 x cylinders aligned centrally | 0.96 ± 0.02 | n.a | 3.6 ± 1.4 | 0.75 ± 0.21 | 2.9 ± 1.9 | 894 ± 139 | 940 ± 142 |
| 3 | 6 mth.–1 yr. | whole cortical bone | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.030 ±0.013 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.48 ± 0.47 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 939 ± 31 | 972 ± 12 |
| 3 | 6 mth.–1 yr. | 3 x cylinders aligned centrally | 0.97 ± 0.01 | n.a | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 926 ± 18 | 966 ± 11 |
| 4 | 1 yr.–10 yr. | whole cortical bone | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.059 ± 0.049 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.40 ± 0.78 | 2.6 ± 1.6 | 923 ± 37 | 956 ± 24 |
| 4 | 1 yr.–10 yr. | 3 x cylinders aligned centrally | 0.94 ± 0.05 | n.a | 3.6 ± 1.8 | 0.76 ± 0.20 | 3.0 ± 2.4 | 877 ± 59 | 944 ± 19 |
| 5 | >100 yr. | whole cortical bone | 0.84± 0.23 | 0.141 ± 0.115 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.52 ± 0.40 | 0.76 ± 0.65 | 663 ± 162 | 758 ± 89 |
| 5 | >100 yr. | 3 x cylinders aligned centrally | 0.85 ± 0.11 | n.a | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 674 ± 134 | 776 ± 91 |
BV/TV [%], ratio between the total analyzed area and the bone compartment of a predefined ROI (region of interest). Cort Porosity, Cortical Porosity, cortical volume in %. Tb.N [1/cm], trabecular number, calculated by taking the inverse of the mean distance between the central axes of the structure [60]. Tb.Th [mm], mean trabecular thickness [66]. Tb.Sp [mm], mean trabecular separation [66]. Mean1 [mg HA/cm3], apparent density = Mean density of the bone fraction of the ROI. Mean2 [mg HA/cm3], material density = mean density over bone compartment of the region an-alyzed; HA, hydroxylapatite.
Figure 2Reconstructions of bone microstructure from micro-CT using the whole cortical bone. (A) 3-D surface renders (B) Cortical pores (C) Connected Cortical Bone Size.
Figure 3Reconstructions of bone microstructure from micro-CT using cylinders aligned centrally in the cortical bone. (A) 3-D surface renders (B) Cortical pores (C) Connected Cortical Bone Size.
Figure 4Boxplots of selected values of micro-CT images from all the extraction locations. The Boxplots and the statistical analysis show no significant deviation between a sample taken from the internal of the bones or the external, this result holds for all investigated parameters.
Figure 5Boxplots of the measured parameters. All parameters show statistically significant differences between the PMI classes (class 1: 0–2 weeks PMI; class 2: 2 weeks–6 months PMI; class 3: 6 months–1 year PMI; class 4: 1 year–10 years PMI; class 5: >100 years PMI).
Figure 6(A) Confusion matrix for the neural network-based bone-age classification. (B) shows the confusion matrix for the age-adjusted bone-age classification. Classes from 1 to 5 indicate time frames (class 1: 0–2 weeks PMI; class 2: 2 weeks–6 months PMI; class 3: 6 months–1 year PMI; class 4: 1 year–10 years PMI; class 5: >100 years PMI). For both settings, a sample classified to class 5 has a 99% likelihood to belong to this class, that equates to a 1% likelihood for it to be classified to the wrong category.