| Literature DB >> 35892637 |
Roberta Ceci1, Mariateresa Maldini2, Mark E Olson3, Domenico Crognale4, Katy Horner4, Ivan Dimauro5, Stefania Sabatini1, Guglielmo Duranti1.
Abstract
The imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and antioxidant defense systems leads to macromolecule and tissue damage as a result of cellular oxidative stress. This phenomenon is considered a key factor in fatigue and muscle damage following chronic or high-intensity physical exercise. In the present study, the antioxidant effect of Moringa oleifera leaf extract (MOLE) was evaluated in C2C12 myotubes exposed to an elevated hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) insult. The capacity of the extract to influence the myotube redox status was evaluated through an analysis of the total antioxidant capacity (TAC), glutathione homeostasis (GSH and GSSG), total free thiols (TFT), and thioredoxin (Trx) activity, as well as the enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and transferase (GST). Moreover, the ability of MOLE to mitigate the stress-induced peroxidation of lipids and oxidative damage (TBARS and protein carbonyls) was also evaluated. Our data demonstrate that MOLE pre-treatment mitigates the highly stressful effects of H2O2 in myotubes (1 mM) by restoring the redox status (TFT, Trx, and GSH/GSSG ratio) and increasing the antioxidant enzymatic system (CAT, SOD, GPx, GST), thereby significantly reducing the TBARs and PrCAR levels. Our study provides evidence that MOLE supplementation has antioxidant potential, allowing myotubes better able to cope with an oxidative insult and, therefore, could represent a useful nutritional strategy for the preservation of muscle well-being.Entities:
Keywords: C2C12 skeletal muscle cells; Moringa oleifera leaf extract (MOLE); enzymatic antioxidant system; oxidative stress; redox status
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892637 PMCID: PMC9330721 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11081435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Relative amounts of constituents of MOLE. Metabolomic analysis was performed on MOLE working solution. Relative percent of different categories of compound was shown in panel (A). SWATH MS/MS spectrum of MOLE extract was performed for glucosinolates analysis. Relative percent were shown in panel (B).
Figure 2MTT assay. C2C12 myotubes were treated with different H2O2 concentrations (0.1–1 mM) for 1 h (dose-dependence, upper panel). Then the effects of MOLE pre-treatments were assayed. C2C12 myotubes were treated with MOLE stock solution dilutions (1/1000 and 1/100 working solution) or vehicle (methanol) in culture media for 24 h. Then, hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) was added to samples pre-treated with vehicle or MOLE for a further hour (lower panel). Cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. Data presented are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments, each performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRLm; # p < 0.05 vs. H2O2.
Figure 3Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and glutathione homeostasis analysis. Measurement of total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total glutathione (tGSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), and reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG) was performed in C2C12 myotubes treated with MOLE stock solution dilutions (1/1000 and 1/100 working solution) or vehicle (methanol) in culture media for 24 h and in samples treated for a further hour with hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) with pre-treatment with vehicle or MOLE. Data presented are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRLm; # p < 0.05 vs. H2O2.
Total free thiols and Thioredoxin activity analysis.
| CTRLm | MOLE 1/1000 | MOLE 1/100 | H2O2 | MOLE 1/1000 | MOLE 1/100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TFT, total free thiols; Trx, thioredoxin; Active Trx, free active form of Trx. C2C12 myotubes were treated with MOLE stock solution dilutions (1/1000 and 1/100 working solution) or vehicle (methanol) in culture media for 24 h. Then, hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) was added to samples pre-treated with vehicle or MOLE for a further hour. After treatments, cells were lysed, and then lysates were used for biochemical analysis. Data presented are the means ± S.D. of three experiments performed in triplicate. a) nmol -SH/g proteins; b) ng Trx/mg proteins. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRLm; # p < 0.05 vs. H2O2.
Enzymatic activity analysis.
| CTRLm | MOLE 1/1000 | MOLE 1/100 | H2O2 | MOLE 1/1000 | MOLE 1/100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione transferase. C2C12 myotubes were treated with MOLE stock solution dilutions (1/1000 and 1/100 working solution) or vehicle (methanol) in culture media for 24 h. Then, hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) was added to samples pre-treated with vehicle or MOLE for a further hour. After treatments, the cells were lysed and then cell lysates were used for biochemical analysis. Data presented are the means ± S.D. of three experiments performed in triplicate. a) U/mg proteins. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRLm; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 vs. H2O2.
Figure 4Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs) and protein carbonyls (PrCar) analysis. Measurement of TBARs and PrCar analysis was performed in C2C12 myotubes treated with MOLE stock solution dilutions (1/1000 and 1/100 working solution) or vehicle (methanol) in culture media for 24 h and in samples treated for a further hour with hydrogen peroxide (1 mM) with pre-treatment with vehicle or MOLE. Data presented are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRLm; ## p < 0.01 vs. H2O2.