| Literature DB >> 35890015 |
Fangjie Zhou1,2, Zhifei Su1,2, Qinyang Li1,2, Renke Wang1,2, Ying Liao3, Min Zhang1,2, Jiyao Li1,2.
Abstract
Background: Cleft palate (CP) patients have a higher prevalence of oral and respiratory tract bacterial infections than the general population. Nevertheless, characteristics of bacterial differences induced by CP-related anatomical heterogeneity are unknown.Entities:
Keywords: 16S ribosomal RNA; bacterial translocation; cleft palate; high-throughput sequencing; nasal bacteria; oral bacteria; spatial heterogeneity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890015 PMCID: PMC9323727 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11070771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Characteristics of oral and nasal bacterial community in CP children and healthy children. (A) Shannon index and (B) Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray–Curtis of salivary and nasal bacteria in the CP and healthy children. (C) The circos demonstrates the community structure via the relative abundance of the top 15 genus of salivary and nasal bacteria in the two groups. The p values were obtained by analysis of variance (* p < 0.05). HC: healthy children. CPC: cleft palate children.
Figure 2Distinct genera between the CP and healthy children. (A,B) Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe, α = 0.05, log10 LDA score > 2.0) revealed 10 genera (green) with greater relative abundance in the cleft palate nasal bacteria and 5 genera (red) with greater relative abundance in the control children saliva. H: healthy. CP: cleft palate. Post: postoperative.
Figure 3Characteristics of oral and nasal bacterial community in CP, postoperative and healthy adolescents. (A) Shannon index and (B) Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray–Curtis of salivary and nasal bacteria in the three groups. (C) The circlize demonstrates the community structure via the relative abundance of the top 15 species of salivary and nasal bacteria in the three groups. The p values were obtained by analysis of variance (* p < 0.05). HA: healthy adolescents. CPA: cleft palate adolescents. Post A: postoperative adolescents.
Figure 4Distinct genera between the CP, postoperative, and healthy adolescents. (A–C) Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe, α = 0.05, log10 LDA score > 2.0) revealed 21 and 14 genera (green) with greater relative abundance in the CP and postoperative than the healthy group of nasal bacteria. There are only 4 genera with greater relative abundance in the CP group than postoperative group. H: healthy. CP: cleft palate. Post: postoperative.
Figure 5Characteristics of TS O-N bacs in children and adolescents. (A) Venn diagram revealed there were seven TS O-N bacs in children and adolescents. (B) Changes in relative abundance of seven TS O-N bacs in nasal of five populations (CP and healthy children; CP, healthy, and postoperative adolescents). The p values were obtained by LEfSe (* p < 0.05, α = 0.05, log10 LDA score > 2.0).
Figure 6Correlation network analysis of nasal bacteria in five groups (CP and healthy children; CP, healthy, and postoperative adolescents). Correlation network analysis graphs contain nodes and edges. Nodes represent bacterial genera, and edges represent spearman correlation coefficient. Blue edges represent positive correlation and green represent negative correlation. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) with a coefficient of at least 0.6 are exhibited.