| Literature DB >> 35888696 |
Joshua P Heynen1,2, Eric J Paxman1,2, Prachi Sanghavi1,2,3, J Keiko McCreary1, Tony Montina2,3, Gerlinde A S Metz1,2.
Abstract
Metabolic risk factors are among the most common causes of noncommunicable diseases, and stress critically contributes to metabolic risk. In particular, social isolation during pregnancy may represent a salient stressor that affects offspring metabolic health, with potentially adverse consequences for future generations. Here, we used proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to analyze the blood plasma metabolomes of the third filial (F3) generation of rats born to lineages that experienced either transgenerational or multigenerational maternal social isolation stress. We show that maternal social isolation induces distinct and robust metabolic profiles in the blood plasma of adult F3 offspring, which are characterized by critical switches in energy metabolism, such as upregulated formate and creatine phosphate metabolisms and downregulated glucose metabolism. Both trans- and multigenerational stress altered plasma metabolomic profiles in adult offspring when compared to controls. Social isolation stress increasingly affected pathways involved in energy metabolism and protein biosynthesis, particularly in branched-chain amino acid synthesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle (lactate, citrate), muscle performance (alanine, creatine phosphate), and immunoregulation (serine, threonine). Levels of creatine phosphate, leucine, and isoleucine were associated with changes in anxiety-like behaviours in open field exploration. The findings reveal the metabolic underpinnings of epigenetically heritable diseases and suggest that even remote maternal social stress may become a risk factor for metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, and adverse mental health outcomes. Metabolomic signatures of transgenerational stress may aid in the risk prediction and early diagnosis of non-communicable diseases in precision medicine approaches.Entities:
Keywords: 1H NMR spectroscopy; biomarkers; developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD); diabetes; metabolomics; multigenerational stress; prenatal maternal stress (PNMS); risk prediction; social isolation stress; transgenerational stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35888696 PMCID: PMC9320469 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12070572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Principle component analysis (PCA) plots showing unsupervised separation between the groups: (A) transgenerationally stressed rats (TPS) vs. non-stressed controls (CONT); (B) multigenerationally stressed rats (MPS) vs. non-stressed controls (CONT); and (C) transgenerationally stressed rats (TPS) vs. multigenerationally stressed rats (MPS). Each PCA was carried out using only the bins that were determined to be significantly altered. Each point (triangle, cross, circle, or square) represents one individual based on the list of blood plasma metabolites found to be statistically significant via a Mann–Whitney U test and VIAVC analysis. Coloured ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals. x and y axes show principal components 1 and 2, respectively, with brackets indicating the variance explained by each principal component. Note that the metabolomes of both TPS and MPS differed substantially from CONT and from each other.
p-values of blood plasma metabolites found to be significant in male Long-Evans rats in either a Mann–Whitney U test, the variable importance analysis based on random variable combination (VIAVC), or both. Rats were either non-stressed (CONT), transgenerationally-stressed (TPS), or multigenerationally-stressed (MPS). Up- or downregulation of the metabolites is also indicated. Metabolites with multiple peaks are represented as metabolite.1, metabolite.2… metabolite.n.
| Group | Metabolite | NMR Chemical Shift Range of Bin (ppm) | Mann-Whitney U Test | VIAVC | VIP Score | Regulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F3-TPS vs. F3-CONT | Creatine phosphate | 3.035641–3.028 | 1.62 × 10−2 | 4.40 × 10−9 | 1.51 | Up |
| Formate | 8.5343705–8.442 | 2.83 × 10−2 | 2.09 × 10−6 | 1.51 | Up | |
| Glucose.1 | 3.715–3.704 | 1.09 × 10−1 | 7.02 × 10−6 | 0.87 | Down | |
| Leucine.1, isoleucine.1, 2-hydroxyisovalerate.1 | 0.9586–0.9476 | 7.27 × 10−2 | 1.12 × 10−47 | 0.84 | Down | |
| Alanine | 1.498–1.4878 | 4.85 × 10−2 | 2.35 × 10−20 | 0.81 | Down | |
| Glucose.2 | 3.526–3.514123 | 3.68 × 10−1 | 1.20 × 10−7 | 0.80 | Down | |
| Leucine.2, isoleucine.2 | 0.9812075–0.9682 | 4.85 × 10−2 | 1.85 × 10−30 | 0.72 | Down | |
| 2-Hydroxyisovalerate.2, 2-oxoisocaproate | 0.9476–0.9133615 | 5.70 × 10−1 | 6.83 × 10−22 | 0.40 | Down | |
| F3-MPS vs. F3-CONT | Singlet at 8.38 ppm | 8.442–8.388584 | 1.09 × 10−1 | 3.46 × 10−37 | 1.54 | Up |
| Formate | 8.5343705–8.442 | 7.27 × 10−2 | 3.03 × 10−54 | 1.14 | Up | |
| Creatine phosphate | 3.035641–3.028 | 2.83 × 10−2 | 2.39 × 10−2 | 1.09 | Up | |
| 3-Methylxanthine | 8.388584–8.0675875 | 3.68 × 10−1 | 4.02 × 10−31 | 1.02 | Up | |
| Threonine | 3.5998105–3.59 | 4.85 × 10−2 | 1.66 × 10−20 | 0.94 | Up | |
| Tyramine.1 | 7.0614405–6.05 | 6.83 × 10−1 | 1.25 × 10−20 | 0.82 | Up | |
| Glucose, betaine | 3.28–3.2684065 | 7.27 × 10−2 | 2.81 × 10−31 | 0.64 | Down | |
| Tyramine.2 | 7.2946365–7.0614405 | 9.33 × 10−1 | 3.90 × 10−27 | 0.35 | Up | |
| F3-TPS vs. F3-MPS | Citrate.1 | 2.68–2.6728 | 6.50 × 10−2 | 5.94 × 10−11 | 1.64 | Down |
| Citrate.2 | 2.543–2.5269 | 8.30 × 10−2 | 3.34 × 10−12 | 1.40 | Down | |
| Citrate.3 | 2.5269135–2.511 | 1.05 × 10−1 | 7.66 × 10−11 | 1.31 | Down | |
| Citrate.4 | 2.6727785–2.62297 | 1.05 × 10−1 | 2.25 × 10−8 | 1.17 | Down | |
| Choline | 3.22–3.203 | 2.07 × 10−2 | 1.75 × 10−13 | 0.91 | Down | |
| Lactate | 4.137413–4.12681 | 3.79 × 10−2 | - | 0.91 | Down | |
| Succinate | 2.412–2.402 | 1.95 × 10−1 | 1.01 × 10−10 | 0.89 | Up | |
| Alanine.1 | 1.487783–1.476 | 8.30 × 10−2 | 9.29 × 10−16 | 0.89 | Down | |
| Alanine.2 | 1.498–1.4878 | 2.34 × 10−1 | 3.88 × 10−10 | 0.83 | Down | |
| Serine.1, creatine | 3.971–3.937 | 2.34 × 10−1 | 4.95 × 10−8 | 0.77 | Up | |
| Serine.2 | 3.8517095–3.849 | 4.99 × 10−2 | 5.3 × 10−3 | 0.65 | Down | |
| Alanine.3 | 3.8066745–3.798575 | 1.61 × 10−1 | 1.27 × 10−8 | 0.45 | Down | |
| Tyramine | 7.2946365–7.0614405 | 2.34 × 10−1 | 2.99 × 10−8 | 0.36 | Up |
Figure 2Pathway-associated metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) for TPS vs. CONT. (A) Plot showing affected biological processes in transgenerationally stressed (TPS) compared to non-stressed (CONT) rats based on metabolites identified as significantly altered between these groups. The p-value for each pathway is shown using the heatmap on the right of the figure and the fold enrichment shows how many times greater than chance the process is involved. (B) Metabolomic pathway analysis showing all matched pathways according to p-values from pathway enrichment analysis and pathway impact values from pathway topology analysis in TPS and non-stressed CONT rats. The y-axis shows the negative natural log of p, such that a higher value on the y-axis gives a lower p-value. The x-axis gives the pathway impact, which correlates to the number of metabolite hits in a particular pathway. Only metabolic pathways with p < 0.05 are labeled. TPS had the highest impact on valine, leucin, and isoleucine biosynthesis.
Figure 3Pathway-associated metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) for MPS vs. CONT. (A) Plot displaying affected biological processes in multigenerationally stressed (MPS) compared to non-stressed control (CONT) rats based on metabolites identified as significantly different between these groups. The p-value for each pathway is indicated in the gradient on the right side. The fold enrichment shows how many times greater than chance the pathway is involved. (B) Metabolomic pathway analysis showing all matched pathways according to p-values from pathway enrichment analysis and pathway impact values from pathway topology analysis in MPS and non-stressed CONT rats. The y-axis shows the negative natural log of p, such that a higher value on the y-axis gives a lower p-value. The x-axis indicates the pathway impact, which correlates to the number of metabolite hits in a particular pathway. Only metabolic pathways with p < 0.05 are labeled. MPS had the highest impact on the glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism.
Figure 4Pathway-associated metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) for TPS vs. MPS. (A) Plot showing affected biological processes in transgenerationally stressed (TPS) compared to multigenerationally stressed (MPS) rats, based on metabolites identified as significantly altered between these groups. The p-value for each pathway is shown using the heatmap on the right of the figure and the fold enrichment shows how many times greater than chance the process is involved. (B) Metabolomic pathway analysis showing all matched pathways according to p-values from pathway enrichment analysis and pathway impact values from pathway topology analysis in TPS vs. MPS rats. The y-axis shows the negative natural log of p, such that a higher value on the y-axis gives a lower p-value. The x-axis indicates the pathway impact, which correlates to the number of metabolite hits in a particular pathway. Only metabolic pathways with p < 0.05 are labeled. The largest difference in pathway activity between TPS and MPS was observed in the glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism.
Spearman’s rank correlations of blood plasma metabolite concentrations of creatine phosphate and leucine/isoleucine in relation to open field (OF) behavioural measurements. Correlation coefficients were obtained utilizing metabolite concentrations from comparisons of non-stressed (CONT) versus multigenerationally-stressed (MPS) Long-Evans rats and non-stressed (CONT) versus transgenerationally-stressed (TPS) Long-Evans rats. *—indicates a correlation with a p-value less than 0.05; **—indicates a correlation with a p-value less than 0.01.
| Creatine Phosphate | Leucine/Isoleucine | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | TPS vs. CONT | MPS vs. CONT | TPS vs. CONT | MPS vs. CONT | ||||
| Rho | Rho | Rho | Rho | |||||
| Total Distance | −0.712 ** | 0.009 | 0.646 * | 0.023 | ||||
| Number of Vertical Moves | −0.636 * | 0.026 | ||||||
| Vertical Time | −0.730 ** | 0.007 | −0.691 * | 0.013 | 0.660 * | 0.02 | ||
| Central Distance | −0.635 * | 0.026 | 0.674 * | 0.016 | 0.656 * | 0.02 | ||
Figure 5Illustration summarizing the experimental design generating lineages of transgenerational prenatal stress (TPS) and multigenerational prenatal stress (MPS) through filial generation zero (F0) to F3.