| Literature DB >> 35887574 |
Carlos Márquez1, Bárbara Angel1, Lydia Lera1,2, Rebecca Bendayan3,4, Hugo Sánchez1, Cecilia Albala1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing aging of the population with the consequent increase of age-associated cognitive disorders pose the challenge of controlling its preventable risk factors, among which vitamin D deficit is a putative factor. Thus, our objective is to explore the association between vitamin D and cognitive performance in a cohort study of community-dwelling Chilean older people.Entities:
Keywords: aging; cognitive function; mild cognitive impairment; vitamin D
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887574 PMCID: PMC9319397 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
General characteristics of the sample by sex.
| Characteristics | Men | Women | Total | Statistics Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 66.59 ± 4.57 | 66.58 ± 4.50 | 66.58 ± 4.52 | <0.98 * |
| MMSE SF (points) | 17 | 17 | 17 | <0.37 *** |
| Vitamin D ng/mL mean SD | 29.61 ± 15.33 | 27.37 ± 14.94 | 28.05 ± 15.08 | <0.035 * |
| Years of | 8.87 ± 4.89 | 8.29 ± 4.61 | 8.47 ± 4.70 | <0.09 * |
| Number of | 1.15 ± 0.96 | 1.27 ± 1.03 | 1.23 ± 1.01 | <0.11 * |
| Diabetes | 44 | 110 | 154 | <0.46 ** |
| High Blood | 170 | 374 | 544 | <0.45 ** |
| Depression | 20 | 122 | 142 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 27.95 ± 4.30 | 29.29 ± 5.04 | 28.88 ± 4.86 | 0.0002 * |
| Smoking | 14 | 57 | 71 | <0.036 ** |
| Drinking | 81 | 84 | 165 | <0.001 ** |
| Sedentary | 191 | 409 | 600 | <0.31 ** |
MMSE SF: Mini mental State Examination Short Form, BMI: Body Mass Index, SD: Standard deviation, * T-Students paired mean, ** Pearson chi2 test, *** Sd test mean.
Vitamin D status according to cognitive status, nutritional state, depression and diabetes.
| Vitamin D Categories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Normal | Deficiency | Severe Deficiency | Total | Statistics Test |
| Cognitive status | - | - | - | - | - |
| Normal | 598 (95.99) | 214 (92.24) | 89 (89.0) | 901 (94.34) | 0.005 * |
| Mild Cognitive Impairment | 25 (4.01) | 18 (7.76) | 11 (11.0) | 54 (6.66) | - |
| Nutritional Status | - | - | - | - | 0.595 * |
| Normal | 127 (20.39) | 42 (18.10) | 18 (18.0) | 187 (19.58) | |
| Undernutrition | 1 (0.16) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.10) | |
| Overweight | 298 (47.83) | 94 (40.52) | 48 (48.0) | 440 (46.01) | |
| Obesity | 197 (31.62) | 96 (41.38) | 34 (34.0) | 327 (34.24) | |
| Depression (GDS-15) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yes | 56 (8.99) | 14 (6.03) | 10 (10.0) | 80 (8.38) | 0.436 * |
| No | 567 (91.01) | 218 (93.97) | 90 (90.0) | 875 (91.62) | - |
| Diabetes | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yes | 101 (16.21) | 42 (18.10) | 22 (22.0) | 165 (17.28) | 0.339 * |
| No | 522 (83.79) | 190 (81.90) | 78 (78.0) | 790 (82.72) | |
GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale, * Pearson chi2 test.
Penalized logistic models for Mild cognitive Impairment risk According to baseline vitamin D status.
| Variables | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Full Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Vitamin D | - | - | - |
| Deficiency | 1.73 (0.86–3.48) | 1.34 (0.64–2.81) | 1.25 (0.64–2.85) |
| Severe deficiency | 3.31 (1.52–7.17) | 2.36 (1.05–5.31) | 2.34 (1.03–5.312) |
| Age | - | 1.13 (1.07–1.21) | 1.14 (1.07–1.21) |
| Sex | - | 1.93 (0.85–4.37) | 1.71 (0.75–3.92) |
| Years of | - | 0.84 (0.78–0.92) | 0.85 (0.78–0.93) |
| Nutritional Status | - | - | - |
| Overweight | - | - | 0.80 (0.32–1.99) |
| Obesity | - | - | 0.93 (0.36–2.49) |
| Depression | - | - | 2.24 (1.17–4.29) |
| Diabetes | - | - | 1.22 (0.49–3.06) |
| High blood | - | - | 0.86 (0.39–1.89) |
| Multimorbidity | - | - | 0.90 (0.40–1.76) |
RR: Relative Risk, 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals.