Literature DB >> 35887502

Morphological and Phylogenetic Characterization Reveals Five New Species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales).

Zhiqin Wang1,2, Yao Wang1,2, Quanying Dong1,2, Qi Fan2, Van-Minh Dao3, Hong Yu1,2.   

Abstract

Samsoniella is a very important fungal resource, with some species in the genus having great medical, economic and ecological value. This study reports five new species of Samsoniella from Yunnan Province and Guizhou Province in Southwestern China and Dole Province in Vietnam, providing morphological descriptions, illustrations, phylogenetic placements, associated hosts and comparisons with allied taxa. Based on morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses of combined nrSSU, nrLSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2 sequence data, it was determined that these five new species were located in the clade of Samsoniella and different from other species of Samsoniella. The five novel species had morphologies similar to those of other species in the genus, with bright orange cylindrical to clavate stromata (gregarious). The fertile part lateral sides usually had a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, and superficial perithecia. The phialides had a swollen basal portion, tapering abruptly into a narrow neck and oval or fusiform one-celled conidia, often in chains. The morphological characteristics of 23 species in Samsoniella, including five novel species and 18 known taxa, were also compared in the present study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  isaria-like fungi; micromorphology; phylogenetic analyses; taxonomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35887502      PMCID: PMC9321185          DOI: 10.3390/jof8070747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)        ISSN: 2309-608X


1. Introduction

Samsoniella was established by Mongkolsamrit et al. (2018) based on morphological and molecular evidence to accommodate three isaria-like species: the type species S. inthanonensis and two other species, S. alboaurantia and S. aurantia [1]. Samsoniella species were characterized by the formation of bright orange, cylindrical to clavate stromata (gregarious). The fertile part lateral sides usually had a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, superficial perithecia. Or the formation of anamorphic synnemata, the phialides had a swollen basal portion, tapering abruptly into a narrow neck, conidia oval to fusiform, one-celled, often in chains [1,2]. In order to account for the phylogenetic diversity of isaria-like species and to segregate these isaria-like fungi from the Akanthomyces group, the genus Samsoniella was established [1]. Isaria Pers. was one of the oldest names for asexually typified genera in Cordycipitaceae; however, many entomogenous fungi morphologically similar to Isaria could be found distributed throughout Hypocreales [3]. In 2017, Kepler et al. revealed a polyphyletic distribution of Isaria species within Cordycipitaceae, proposed the rejection of Isaria and combined 11 species of Isaria into Cordyceps Fr., owing to the confusion surrounding the application of Isaria [4]. Two isolates of I. farinosa (CBS 240.32 and CBS 262.58) that remained genetically distant from CBS 111113 were renamed S. alboaurantium [1]. The species of Samsoniella have diverse biological characteristics. The genus currently contains 18 species (http://www.indexfungorum.org, accessed on 1 May 2022), among which S. hepiali is an essential medicinal fungus [1,2]. The chemical profile of S. hepiali is very similar to the profiles of Ophiocordyceps sinensis, and recent studies show that S. hepiali performs various biological pharmacological activities such as anti-cancer, analgesic and hypoglycaemic activity, and is a good substitute for O. sinensis [5]. The related species of S. hepiali may have similar pharmacological activities. However, no research on other members of the genus has yet been reported. During surveys of entomopathogenic fungi from different regions in Yunnan Province, Guizhou Province of Southwestern China and Dole Province of Vietnam, five Samsoniella species were found and identified. Based on morphological evidence together with multigene (nrSSU, nrLSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2) sequence analyses, it was shown that these five new Samsoniella species were distinguished from other species of the genus. They were named S. coccinellidicola, S. farinospora, S. haniana, S. pseudotortricidae and S. sinensis. Furthermore, the morphological characteristics of 23 species in Samsoniella, comprising 5 novel species and 18 known taxa, were also compared.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Isolation

The majority of the specimens used in this study were collected from Yunnan Province in China. Some specimens were collected from the Chu Yang Sin National Park of Dole Province in Vietnam. The specimens were noted and photographed in the fields. The sample was placed in an ice box and brought to the laboratory for preservation at 4 °C. To obtain axenic cultures, the stromata or synnemata were removed from the insect bodies and divided into 3–4 segments, each 2 mm long. The segments were immersed in 30% H2O2 for 30 s and then soaked in sterilized water for 1 minute. After drying on sterilized filter paper, the segments were inoculated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA: fresh potato 200 g/L, dextrose 20 g/L, and agar 18 g/L) plates. The conidia of cordycipitoid fungi at the conidial masses were picked using an inoculating loop and spread on PDA plates containing 0.1 g/L streptomycin and 0.05 g/L tetracycline [2]. Pure cultures were incubated at room temperature (about 25 °C). After isolation into pure cultures, they were transplanted to a PDA slant and stored at 4 °C. The specimens were deposited in the Yunnan Herbal Herbarium (YHH) at the Institute of Herb Biotic Resources, Yunnan University. The strain was deposited at the Yunnan Fungal Culture Collection (YFCC) of the Institute of Herb Biotic Resources, Yunnan University.

2.2. Morphological Observations

For descriptions of the sexual morph, fruiting bodies were photographed and measured using an Olympus SZ61 (Tokyo, Japan) stereomicroscope. Stromata were sectioned at a thickness of ca. 40 µm with a freezing microtome and mounted in water or lactic acid cotton blue on a slide for microscopic studies and photomicrography. The micro-morphological characteristics of the fungi, such as the perithecia, asci and ascospores, were examined using Olympus CX40 (Tokyo, Japan) and BX53 (Tokyo, Japan) microscopes. The circular agar blocks, circa 5 mm in diameter, from a colony were removed and placed on new PDA plates to observe the colony morphology. The colonies on PDA plates were cultured at 25 °C for 2 weeks, and the colony characteristics (size, texture and colour) were photographed with a Canon 700D camera. To observe the asexual morphological characteristics (e.g., conidiophores, phialides and conidia), Olympus CX40 and BX53 microscopes were employed.

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR and Sequencing for Nuclear Genes

Total genomic DNA was extracted from axenic living cultures using the MiniBEST Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The nuclear ribosomal small subunit (nrSSU) was amplified with the primer pair nrSSU-CoF and nrSSU-CoR [6]. The nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU) was amplified with the primer pair LR5 and LR0R [7,8]. The translation elongation factor 1α (tef-1α) was amplified with the primers EF1α-EF and EF1α-ER [9,10]. The largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase II (rpb1 and rpb2) were amplified with the primers RPB1-5′F and RPB1-5′R, RPB2-5′F and RPB2-5′R, respectively [9,10]. In this study, five nuclear gene loci of all the samples were amplified, and the primers used were shown in Table 1. The above five pairs were synthesized by Kunming Xiuqi Technology Co., Ltd. Each 50 µL PCR included 25 μL of 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 0.5 µL of each forward and reverse primer (10 μM), 1 μL of genomic DNA and 23 μL of sterilized distilled water. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed as described by Wang et al. [11]. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.0% agarose gels, purified using a Gel Band Purification Kit (Bio Teke Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and then sequenced on an automatic sequence analyser (BGI Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). When the PCR products could not be sequenced directly, cloning was performed using a TaKaRa PMDTM18-T vector system (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China).
Table 1

PCR primers used in this study.

GenePrimer5′-Sequence-3′References
nrSSUnrSSU-CoFTCTCAAAGATTAAGCCATGC[6]
nrSSU-CoRTCACCAACGGAGACCTTG
nrLSULR5ATCCTGAGGGAAACTTC[7,8]
LR0RGTACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC
tef-1α EF1α-EFGCTCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTTYAT[9,10]
EF1α-ERATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTG
rpb1 RPB1-5′FCAYCCWGGYTTYATCAAGAA[9,10]
RPB1-5′RCCNGCDATNTCRTTRTCCATRTA
rpb2 RPB2-5′FCCCATRGCTTGTYYRCCCAT[9,10]
RPB2-5′RGAYGAYMGWGATCAYTTYGG

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the nrSSU, nrLSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2 sequences. The DNA sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank. Reference sequences were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 1 May 2022). The specimen information and GenBank accession numbers were provided in Table 2. The sequences were aligned using the Clustal X2.0 (developted by European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, the United Kingdom) and MEGA v6.06 (developted by Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan) software with manual adjustment [12,13]. The aligned sequences of five genes were concatenated after sequence alignment and specific processing according to Wang et al. [2]. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the Bayesian Inference (BI) and the Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods employing MrBayes v3.1.2 and RAxML 7.0.3 [14,15]. The BI analysis was run on MrBayes v3.1.2 for five million generations using a GTR + G + I model determined by the jModelTest version 2.1.4 (developted by The University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain) [16]. The GTR + I was selected as the optimal model for the ML analyses, with 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates performed on the five-gene datasets.
Table 2

Names, voucher information, host and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in this study.

TaxonVoucher InformationHostGenBank Accession NumberReferences
nrSSUnrLSU tef-1α rpb1 rpb2
Akanthomyces attenuatus CBS 402.78Leaf litterAF339614AF339565EF468782EF468888EF468935[10]
coccidioperitheciatus NHJ 6709 Araneae EU369110EU369042EU369025EU369067EU369086[17]
A. dipterigenus CBS 126.27Hemiptera: MonophlebidaeAF339605AF339556KM283820KR064300KR064303Unpublished
A. lecanii CBS 101247Hemiptera: CoccidaeAF339604AF339555DQ522359DQ522407DQ522466[18]
A. muscarius CBS 143.62Hemiptera: AleyrodidaeKM283774KM283798KM283821KM283841KM283863Unpublished
A. sabanensis ANDES-F 1024Hemiptera: CoccidaeKC633251KC875225KC633266 KC633249[19]
A. sulphureus TBRC 7248 Araneae  MF140722MF140843MF140787MF140812[1]
A. waltergamsii TBRC 7252 Araneae  MF140714MF140834MF140782MF140806[1]
Amphichorda felina YFCC 850Bird droppingsMW181774MW173986MW168227MW168193MW168210[20]
A. felina YFCC 851Bird droppingsMW181775MW173987MW168228MW168194MW168211[20]
A. guana CGMCC 3.17908Bat guanoKY883262KU746711KX855211KY883202KY883228[21]
A. guana CGMCC 3.17909Bat guanoKY883263KU746712KX855212KY883203 [21]
Beauveria acridophila HUA 179219Orthoptera: Acrididae JQ895541JQ958613JX003857JX003841[22]
B. acridophila HUA 179220Orthoptera: AcrididaeJQ895527JQ895536JQ958614JX003852JX003842[22]
B. araneola GZAC 150317 Araneae   KT961699KT961701 [23]
B. asiatica ARSEF 4850Coleoptera: Cerambycidae  AY531937HQ880859HQ880931[24]
B. australis ARSEF 4598Soil  HQ880995HQ880861HQ880933[24]
B. bassiana YFCC 3369Coleoptera: ScarabaeidaeMN576768MN576824MN576994 MN576884 MN576938[2]
B. baoshanensis CCTCC AF 2018011Coleoptera: ChrysomelidaeMG642882MG642840MG642897MG642854MG642867[25]
B. caledonica YFCC 7025 MN576771MN576827MN576997MN576887 MN576941[2]
B. kipukae ARSEF 7032Homoptera: Delphacidae  HQ881005HQ880875HQ880947[24]
B. majiangensis YFCC 852Hemiptera: PentatomidaeMW181776MW173988MW168229MW168195MW168212[20]
B. polyrhachicola YFCC 859Hymenoptera: FormicidaeMW181783MW173995MW168236MW168202MW168219[20]
B.scarabaeidicola ARSEF 5689Coleoptera: ScarabaeidaeAF339574AF339524DQ522335DQ522380DQ522431[20]
B. varroae ARSEF 8257Coleoptera: Curculionidae  HQ881002HQ880872HQ880944[24]
Blackwellomyces cardinalis OSC 93609Lepidoptera: TineidaeAY184973AY184962DQ522325DQ522370DQ522422[18]
B. cardinalis OSC 93610Lepidoptera: TineidaeAY184974AY184963EF469059EF469088EF469106[18]
B. pseudomilitaris BCC 1919Lepidoptera (Larva)MF416588MF416534MF416478 MF416440[4]
B. pseudomilitaris BCC 2091Lepidoptera (Larva)MF416589MF416535MF416479 MF416441[4]
Cordyceps amoene-rosea CBS 107.73Coleoptera (Pupa)AY526464MF416550MF416494MF416651MF416445[26]
C. amoene-rosea CBS 729.73Coleoptera: NitidulidaeMF416604MF416551MF416495MF416652MF416446[26]
C. bifusispora EFCC 5690Lepidoptera (Pupa)EF468952EF468806EF468746EF468854EF468909[10]
C. bifusispora spat 08-133.1Lepidoptera (Pupa)MF416577MF416524MF416469MF416631MF416434[4]
C. cateniobliqua YFCC 3367Coleoptera adultMN576765MN576821MN576991MN576881MN576935[2]
C. exasperata MCA 2288Lepidoptera (Larva)MF416592MF416538MF416482MF416639 [4]
C. militaris YFCC 6587Lepidoptera (Pupa)MN576762MN576818MN576988MN576878MN576932[2]
C. militaris YFCC 5840Lepidoptera (Pupa)MN576763MN576819MN576989MN576879MN576933[2]
C. ninchukispora EGS 38.166 Plant (Beilschmiedia erythrophloia)EF468992EF468847EF468794EF468901 [10]
C. polyarthra MCA 996 Lepidoptera MF416597MF416543MF416487MF416644 [4]
C. pruinosa ARSEF 5413Lepidoptera: LimacodidaeAY184979AY184968DQ522351DQ522397DQ522451[18]
C. pseudotenuipes YFCC 8404 Lepidoptera OL468559 OL468579OL473527OL739573 OL473538[27]
C. tenuipes TBRC 7265 Lepidoptera (Pupa) MF140707MF140827MF140776MF140800[1]
Samsoniella alboaurantium CBS 240.32Lepidoptera (Pupa)JF415958JF415979JF416019JN049895JF415999[1]
S. alboaurantium CBS 262.58Soil  MF416497MF416654MF416448[1]
S. alpina YFCC 5818Hepialidae(Hepialus baimaensis)MN576753MN576809MN576979MN576869MN576923[2]
S. alpina YFCC 5831Hepialidae(Hepialus baimaensis)MN576754MN576810MN576980MN576870MN576924[2]
S. antleroides YFCC 6016Noctuidae (Larvae)MN576747MN576803MN576973MN576863MN576917[2]
S. antleroides YFCC 6113Noctuidae (Larvae)MN576748MN576804MN576974MN576864MN576918[2]
S. aurantia TBRC 7271 Lepidoptera  MF140728MF140846MF140791MF140818[1]
S. aurantia TBRC 7272 Lepidoptera  MF140727MF140845 MF140817[1]
S. cardinalis YFCC 5830Limacodidae (Pupa)MN576732MN576788MN576958MN576848MN576902[2]
S. cardinalis YFCC 6144Limacodidae (Pupa)MN576730MN576786MN576956MN576846MN576900[2]
S. coccinellidicola YFCC 8772 Coccinellidae ON563166 ON621670 ON676514 ON676502 ON568685 This study
S. coccinellidicola YFCC 8773 Coccinellidae ON563167 ON621671 ON676515 ON676503 ON568686 This study
S. coleopterorum A19501Curculionidae (Snout beetle)  MN101586MT642600MN101585[28]
S. cristata YFCC 6021Saturniidae (Pupa)MN576735MN576791MN576961MN576851MN576905[2]
S. cristata YFCC 7004Saturniidae (Pupa)MN576737MN576793MN576963MN576853MN576907[2]
S. farinospora YFCC 8774 Araneae (Spider) ON563168 ON621672 ON676516 ON676504 ON568687 This study
S. farinospora YFCC 9051 Lepidoptera : Hepialus ON563169 ON621673 ON676517 ON676505 ON568688 This study
S. haniana YFCC 8769 Lepidoptera (pupa) ON563170 ON621674 ON676518 ON676506 ON568689 This study
S. haniana YFCC 8770 Lepidoptera (pupa) ON563171 ON621675 ON676519 ON676507 ON568690 This study
S. haniana YFCC 8771 Lepidoptera (pupa) ON563172 ON621676 ON676520 ON676508 ON568691 This study
S. hepiali ICMM 82-2Fungi (O. sinensis)MN576738MN576794MN576964MN576854MN576908[2]
S. hepiali YFCC 661Fungi (O. sinensis)MN576739MN576795MN576965MN576855MN576909[2]
S. hepiali Cor-4Fungi (O. sinensis)MN576743MN576799MN576969MN576859MN576913[2]
S. hymenopterorum A19521Vespidae (Bee)  MN101588MT642603MT642604[28]
S. hymenopterorum A19522Vespidae (Bee)  MN101591MN101589MN101590[28]
S. inthanonensis TBRC 7915Lepidoptera (Pupa) MF140725MF140849MF140790MF140815[1]
S. kunmingensis YHH 16002Lepidoptera (Pupa)MN576746MN576802MN576972MN576862MN576916[2]
S. lanmaoa YFCC 6148Lepidoptera (Pupa)MN576733MN576789MN576959MN576849MN576903[2]
S. lanmaoa YFCC 6193Lepidoptera (Pupa)MN576734MN576790MN576960MN576850MN576904[2]
S. pseudogunii GY407201Lepidoptera (Larvae) MZ827010MZ855233 MZ855239[29]
S. pseudogunii GY407202Lepidoptera (Larvae) MZ831865MZ855234 MZ855240[29]
S. pseudotortricidae YFCC 9052 Lepidoptera (pupa) ON563173 ON621677 ON676521 ON676509 ON568692 This study
S. pseudotortricidae YFCC 9053 Lepidoptera (pupa) ON563174 ON621678 ON676522 ON676510 ON568693 This study
S. pupicola DY101681Lepidoptera (Pupa) MZ827009MZ855231 MZ855237[29]
S. pupicola DY101682Lepidoptera (Pupa) MZ827635MZ855232 MZ855238[29]
S. ramosa YFCC 6020Limacodidae (Pupa)MN576749MN576805MN576975MN576865MN576919[2]
S. sinensis YFCC 8766 Lepidoptera (Larvae) ON563175 ON621679 ON676523 ON676511 ON568694 This study
S. sinensis YFCC 8767 Dermaptera ON563176 ON621680 ON676524 ON676512 ON568695 This study
S. sinensis YFCC 8768 Dermaptera ON563177 ON621681 ON676525 ON676513 ON568696 This study
S. tortricidae YFCC 6013Tortricidae (Pupa)MN576751MN576807MN576977MN576867MN576921[2]
S. tortricidae YFCC 6131Tortricidae (Pupa)MN576750MN576806MN576976MN576866MN576920[2]
S. yunnanensis YFCC 1527Fungi (Cordyceps cicadae)MN576756MN576812MN576982MN576872MN576926[2]
S. yunnanensis YFCC 1824Fungi (Cordyceps cicadae)MN576757MN576813MN576983MN576873MN576927[2]
Simplicillium formicae MFLUCC 18-1379Hymenoptera: FormicidaeMK765046MK766512MK926451MK882623 [30]
S. lamellicola CBS 116.25Fungi (Agaricus bisporus)AF339601AF339552DQ522356DQ522404DQ522462[18]
S. lanosoniveum CBS 704.86Fungi (Hemileia vastatrix)AF339602AF339553DQ522358DQ522406DQ522464[18]
S. lanosoniveum CBS 101267Fungi (Hemileia vastatrix)AF339603AF339554DQ522357DQ522405DQ522463[18]
S. obclavatum CBS 311.74Air above sugarcane fieldAF339567AF339517EF468798  [10]
S. yunnanense YFCC 7133Fungi (A. waltergamsii)MN576728MN576784MN576954 MN576844 [2]
Trichoderma deliquescens ATCC 208838On decorticated conifer woodAF543768AF543791AF543781AY489662DQ522446[31]
T. stercorarium ATCC 62321Cow dungAF543769AF543792AF543782AY489633EF469103[31]

Boldface: data generated in this study.

3. Results

3.1. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analyses

The 92 taxa of eight genera—Akanthomyces, Amphichorda, Beauveria, Blackwellomyces, Cordyceps, Samsoniella, Simplicillium and Trichoderma—were used for the ML and BI phylogenetic analyses. Two Trichoderma strains (Trichoderma deliquescens ATCC 208838 and Trichoderma stercorarium ATCC 62321) were designated as the outgroup. The concatenated sequence dataset of the five genes consisted of 4642 bp of sequence data (1055 bp for nrSSU, 897 bp for nrLSU, 969 bp for tef-1α, 756 bp for rpb1 and 965 bp for rpb2). Both phylogenetic trees from the BI and ML analyses exhibited similar topologies that had seven recognized, statistically well-supported clades in Cordycipitaceae, designated as Akanthomyces, Amphichorda, Beauveria, Blackwellomyces, Cordyceps, Samsoniella and Simplicillium (Figure 1). Most of the well-resolved genera and lineages in Cordycipitaceae shared similar relationships with previous analyses [1,4,10]. The 12 samples of five undescribed species also clustered in the genus Samsoniella clade based on the phylogenetic analyses of the combined dataset and were clearly distinct from S. hepiali and 16 described species, viz., S. alboaurantia, S. alpina, S. antleroides, S. aurantia, S. cardinalis, S. coleopterorum, S. cristata, S. hymenopterorum, S. inthanonensis, S. kunmingensis, S. lanmaoa, S. pseudogunii, S. pupicola, S. ramosa, S. tortricidae and S. yunnanensis (Figure 1). Similarly, phylogenetic relationships between the genus Samsoniella and closely related species, based on multigene dataset (nrLSU, nrSSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2) (see Figure 2). Both phylogenetic trees from the BI and ML analyses exhibited similar topologies and the five undescribed species also clustered in the genus Samsoniella clade that were clearly distinct from S. hepiali and 16 described species.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of Cordycipitaceae inferred from multigene dataset (nrLSU, nrSSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2) based on maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses. Statistical support values greater than 50% are shown at the nodes for BI posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap proportions. Isolates in bold type are those analysed in this study.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships between the genus Samsoniella and closely related species, based on multigene dataset (nrLSU, nrSSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2). Statistical support values greater than 50% are shown at the nodes for BI posterior probabilities/ML bootstrap proportions. Isolates in bold type are those analysed in this study.

SYNOPTIC KEYS Samsoniella Samsoniella alboaurantium Samsoniella alpina Samsoniella antleroides Samsoniella aurantia Samsoniella cardinalis Samsoniella coccinellidicola Samsoniella coleopterorum Samsoniella cristata Samsoniella farinospora Samsoniella haniana Samsoniella hepiali Samsoniella hymenopterorum Samsoniella inthanonensis Samsoniella kunmingensis Samsoniella lanmaoa Samsoniella lepidopterorum Samsoniella pseudogunii Samsoniella pseudotortricidae Samsoniella pupicola Samsoniella ramosa Samsoniella sinensis Samsoniella tortricidae Samsoniella yunnanensis

3.2. Taxonomy

The key morphological characteristics that distinguish the current Samsoniella species were summarized in the literature (Table 3 and Table 4). Including the five new species, there were 23 species of Samsoniella involved in the current study, among which we compared 9 species of the sexual morphs in Samsoniella (Table 3) and 22 species of the asexual morphs in Samsoniella (Table 4).
Table 3

Comparison between the sexual morphs in Samsoniella.

SpeciesStromata (mm)Fertile Part (mm)Perithecia (μm)Asci (μm)Ascospores (μm)Reference
Samsoniella antleroides fasciculate, antler-like, cylindrical to clavate, long 22.3–57.8, oblate terminal branches, long 4.6–26.2clavate to fake-like, lateral sides have a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, 6.3–9.5 × 0.6–2.3superficial, fusiform,294–442 × 131–216cylindrical, 8-spored, 160–248 × 2.1–2.7bola-shaped, septate, 110–184 × 0.8–1.3[2]
S. cardinalis several, cylindrical, long 11.5–18.6clavate, lateral sides have a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, 2.5–6.8 × 0.5–2.6superficial, oblong-ovate to fusiform, 370–485 × 140–238cylindrical, 8-spored, 163–320 × 3.2–4.3bola-shaped, septate, 165–230 × 0.5–0.9[2]
S. cristata solitary or two, crista-like, long 25–40, much branchedcrista-like or subulate, 3.1–18.5 × 0.9–8.0superficial, narrowly ovoid, 370–485 × 150–245cylindrical, 8-spored, 180–356 × 3.0–4.8bola-shaped, septate, 155–290 × 1.0–1.3[2]
S. inthanonensis gregarious, cylindrical to clavate, long 20–50, 1–1.5 broad8–15 long, 1.5–2 broadsuperficial, ovoid, (380–)417.5–474.5(–500) × (150–)205–260(–265)cylindrical, 8-spored, 300 × 2–2.5bola-shaped, 3 or 4septate,221.5–267 × 0.5–1[1]
S. kunmingensis solitary, cylindrical to clavate, long 23, bifurcated,clavate, lateral sides usually have a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, 3.3–4.2 × 0.8–1.2superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform,330–395 × 110–185cylindrical, 8-spored, 150–297 × 3.0–4.6bola-shaped, septate, 127–190 × 0.8–1.5[2]
S. pseudotortricidae solitary to several, long 20–65, unbranched or dichotomous clavate to subulate, lateral side usually have a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 10–17 × 1.5–4.2 superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 285.7–313.2 × 149.2–154.9    This study
S. lanmaoa two to five, orange, long 38–69, palmately branchedclavate, lateral sides usually have a longitudinal ditch without producing perithecia, 8.5–11.2 × 0.6–2.3superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform,360–467 × 124–210cylindrical, 8-spored, 160–325 × 3.3–4.8bola-shaped, septate, 135–260 × 0.9–1.4[2]
S. ramosa fascicular, 15–32 × 0.8–1.5, multi-branched, often confluent at the basehaving no obvious boundary with stipessuperficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 340–435 × 130–197  [2]
S. tortricidae gregarious, long 25–60, unbranched or dichotomousclavate to subulate, lateral side usually has a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 5–15 × 1.2–2.3superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 350–468 × 140–225cylindrical, 8-spored, 170–285 × 2.8–4.0bola-shaped, septate, 120–235 × 0.8–1.3[2]

Boldface: data generated in this study.

Table 4

Comparison between the asexual morphs in Samsoniella.

SpeciesSynnemata (mm)Conidiophores (μm)PhialidesPhialides Size (μm)Conidia (μm)References
Samsoniella alboaurantium  30–400 × 2–2.5 5–8 × 2, tapering fairly abruptly at the tipovate to lemon-shaped, 2.3–2.5(–3) × 1.5–1.8[32]
S. alpina irregularly branched, 3–20 long, cylindrical or clavate stipes with white powdery heads3.1–6.5 × 1.6–2.8verticillate on conidiophores, solitary or verticillate on hyphae4.7–9.5 × 1.9–3.1, wide (apex) 0.5–1.1, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval,2.0–3.1 × 1.3–2.1[2]
S. antleroides  3.5–9.7 × 1.3–3.2 verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 9, sometimes solitary on hyphae3.5–16.3 × 1.7–2.9, wide (apex) 0.5–1.0, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval,2.3–3.5 × 1.6–2.5[2]
S. aurantia irregularly branched starting 15–40 above the ground and continuously to the apex, 25–75 × 1–1.5 verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 4(5–)5.5–8.5(–13) × 2–3, basal portion cylindrical to ellipsoidal, neck 2–4 × 1fusiform,(2–)2.5–3.5(–4) × (1–)1.5(–2)[1]
S. cardinalis  3.1–9.5 × 1.3–2.0verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, sometimes solitary on hyphae4.1–43.5 × 1.3–2.4, wide (apex) 0.6–1.2, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval,2.4–3.2 × 1.4–2.2[2]
S. coccinellidicola I rregularly branched, starting 2–2.5 above the cocoons of insect host, 15–25 × 0.8–1.2 4.8–15 × 1.0–1.9 verticillate, usually in whorls of 2 to 5, or solitary on hyphae 6.0–14.1 × 1.0–2.0 wide (apex) 0.3–0.8, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex fusiform or oval, 1.8–3.0 × 1.3–2.0 This study
S. coleopterorum   verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 45.4–9.7 × 1.2–1.8, a cylindrical to ellipsoidal basal portion, tapering into a short distinct neckfusiform, ellipsoidal or subglobose,1.7–2.5 × 1.2–1.8[28]
S. cristata  3.6–11.5 × 1.7–2.5verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, usually solitary on hyphae4.5–23.2 × 1.6–2.7, wide (apex) 0.5–1.1, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval, 2.4–3.2 × 1.6–2.3[2]
S. farinospora   2.4–14.0 × 0.9–1.8 verticillate, usually in whorls of 2 to 4, or solitary on hyphae 3.0–13.5 × 0.6–1.6, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex oblong to cylindrical, 1.6–2.8 × 0.6–1.2 This study
S. haniana usually unbranched or irregularly branched at the apex, 20–40 × 1–1.8 3.8–10.2 × 1.1–2.9 verticillate, usually in whorls of 2 to 5, or solitary on hyphae 5.4–12.1 × 1.2–2.9, wide (apex) 0.3–1.1 basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex fusiform or oval , 2.3–3.7 × 1.2–2.8 This study
S. hepiali branched or unbranched, 5–41 long4.0–7.6 × 1.4–2.2verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, solitary or opposite on hyphae3.5–13.6 × 1.3–2.1, wide (apex) 0.5–1.0, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval, 1.8–3.3 × 1.4–2.2[2]
S. hymenopterorum   Verticillate, in whorls of 3 to 46.5–10.6 × 1.2–2.0, a cylindrical basal portion, tapering to a distinct neckfusiform to ovoid,1.9–2.5 × 1.5–2.1[28]
S. inthanonensis   verticillate in whorls of 2 to 5, sometimes solitary on hyphae(4–)6.5–10(–12) × (1–)1.5–2(–3), cylindrical basal portion, tapering into a long neck, (1–)2.5(–4) × 0.5–1short fusiform,(2–)3(–3.5) × 1.5–2[1]
S. lanmaoa  3.8–13.3 × 1.5–2.1verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 6, usually solitary on hyphae3.5–20.7 × 1.7–2.6, wide (apex) 0.5–1.1, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval, 1.9–2.7 × 1.4–2.0 [2]
S. lepidopterorum   Verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 45.2–8.5 (–13.1) × 1.1–1.7, ellipsoidal basal portion, tapering into a distinct neckfusiform to subglobose,2.0–2.5 × 1.2–2.0[28]
S. pseudotortricidae   6.6–26.5 × 1.1–2.5 verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, usually solitary on hyphae 5.4–6.9 × 1.0–1.6, wide (apex) 0.5–0.8 basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex fusiform or oval, 0.9–1.5 × 0.8–1.3 This study
S. pseudogunnii   solitary or in whorls of 2 to 96.8–11.0 × 2.2–2.4, cylindrical basal portion, tapering into a short distinct neckfusiform2.8–3.2 × 1.7–2.1[29]
S. pupicola   solitary or in whorls of 2 to 97.0–9.2 × 2.5–3.3, a cylindrical basal portion, tapering into a short distinct neckfusiform,2.5–3.3 × 2.2–2.6[29]
S. ramosa  4.3–10.5 × 1.3–2.4verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 6, usually solitary on hyphae5.3–14.6 × 1.3–2.8, wide (apex) 0.6–1.2, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval,2.0–3.6 × 1.5–2.2[2]
S. sinensis 3.5 5 long , branched, conidia in abundance at the apex. 6.4–10.5 × 1.7–2.1 verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, sometimes solitary on hyphae 5.6–9.3 × 1.5–2.1, wide (apex) 0.6–1.0 basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex spherical, elliptical or fusiform, 2.0 3.1 × 1.3–1.9 This study
S. tortricidae  4.2–12.5 × 1.4–2.4verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 5, usually solitary on hyphae3.6–42.4 × 1.1–2.6, wide (apex) 0.4–0.9, basal portion cylindrical to narrowlylageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval, 2.1–3.0 × 1.3–1.7[2]
S. yunnanensis gregarious, flexuous, fleshy, 4–18 long, with terminal branches of 3–7 × 1.0–2.0 4.2–23.5 × 1.4–2.3verticillate, in whorls of 2 to 7, usually solitary on hyphae4.5–11.6 × 1.2–2.4, wide (apex) 0.6–1.0, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apexfusiform or oval, 2.0–3.3 × 1.1–2.2[2]

Boldface: data generated in this study.

H. Yu, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov. (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Morphology of Samsoniella coccinellidicola. (A) Coccinellidae infected by S. coccinellidicola. (B) Culture character on PDA medium. (C–E) Conidiogenous cells (conidiophores, phialides) and conidia on PDA. (F) Conidia on PDA. Scale A: 5 mm; B: 10 mm; C–E: 10 µm; F: 5 µm.

MycoBank: MB 844383. Etymology: “coccinellidicola” refers to the host (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Holotype: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Xishan Forest Park. On the Coccinellidae buried in soil, 12 August 2017, Yao Wang, (YHH 20178, holotype; YFCC 8772, ex-holotype living culture). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Two synnemata arising from oval cocoons of insect host. Synnemata erect, irregularly branched, starting 2–2.5 mm above the oval cocoons of insect host, 15–25 × 0.8–1.2 mm, pale yellow, isaria-like morph producing a mass of conidia along the synnemata, powdery and floccose. Colonies on PDA fast-growing, 49–52 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white, cottony, sporulating abundantly, reverse white to pale yellow. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 0.7–2.1 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 4.8–15 × 1.0–1.9 µm. Phialides verticillate, usually in whorls of two to five, or solitary on hyphae, 6.0–14.1 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 1.0–2.0 µm wide (base) to 0.3–0.8 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 1.8–3.0 × 1.3–2.0 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum. Host: Coccinellidae. Habitat: On the adults of Coccinellidae sp. buried in soil. Distribution: Currently only known in Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China. Other material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Xishan Forest Park. On the Coccinellidae buried in soil, 12 August 2017, Yao Wang (YHH 20179; YFCC 8773, living culture). Notes: The phylogenetic analysis of five genes showed that S. coccinellidicola was closely related to S. pupicola. Morphologically, the new species S. coccinellidicola was distinctly different from S. pupicola due to its longer phialides (6.0–14.1 µm), smaller conidia (1.8–3.0 × 1.3–2.0 µm) and conidia shape. Moreover, S. coccinellidicola was found to occur on an adult beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), while S. pupicola was found on a Lepidopteran pupa. Based on the previous studies of cordycipitaceous isaria-like fungi as well as our study, there were two species of parasitic Samsoniella in the order Coleoptera, i.e., S. coccinellidicola and S. coleopterorum. However, S. coccinellidicola was easily distinguished from S. coleopterorum by its longer phialides (6.0–14.1 µm). H. Yu, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov. (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Morphology of Samsoniella farinospora. (A) Spider infected by S. farinospora. (B,C) Culture character on PDA medium. (D–F) Conidiogenous cells (conidiophores, phialides) and conidia on PDA. (G) Conidia on PDA. Scale A: 2 mm; B,C: 20 mm; D,E: 5 µm; F,G: 3 µm.

MycoBank: MB 844384. Etymology: The species name refers to the farinose conidia covering the host. Holotype: Vietnam, Dole Province, Chu Yang Sin National Park. On a spider on the back of fresh leaves, 22 October 2017, Hong Yu (YHH 20180, holotype; YFCC 8774, ex-holotype living culture). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycosed hosts covered by dense white to lavender mycelia, produces numerous white, powdery conidia. Colonies on PDA fast-growing, 47–50 mm in diameter after 14 days at 25 °C, villiform, light yellow in the middle with a white edge, middle hyphae thickening, reverse light yellow. Hypha smooth-walled, hyaline, septate, 0.7–1.8 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 2.4–14.0 × 0.9–1.8 µm. Phialides verticillate, usually in whorls of two to four or solitary on hyphae, 3.0–13.5 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 0.6–1.6 µm wide (base). Conidia smooth and hyaline, oblong to cylindrical, one-celled, 1.6–2.8 × 0.6–1.2 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum. Host: Spider, larva of Hepialus. Habitat: On a spider on the back of fresh leaves, with a larva of Hepialus clinging to fallen leaves. Distribution: Currently only known in Chu Yang Sin National Park, Dole Province, Vietnam. Other material examined: Vietnam, Dole Province, Chu Yang Sin National Park. On a larva of Hepialus clinging to fallen leaves, 26 October 2017, Hong Yu (YHH 20188; YFCC 9051, living culture). Notes: Morphologically, S. farinospora resembled the phylogenetically sister species S. hepiali. They had the same host, the Hepialid larva, and isaria-like asexual conidiogenous structures, producing synnemata with powdery conidia at the apex. However, S. farinospora was also found to occur on a spider. Parasitic Samsoniella species on spiders had rarely been reported. In addition, our morphological observation revealed a significant difference in conidia sizes between S. farinospora (1.6–2.8 × 0.6–1.2 µm) and S. hepiali (1.8–3.3 × 1.4–2.2 µm). Both the morphological study and phylogenetic analyses of combined nrSSU, nrLSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2 sequence data supported the idea that this fungus was a distinctive species in the genus of Samsoniella. H. Yu, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov. (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Morphology of Samsoniella haniana. (A,B) Pupa of Lepidoptera infected by S. haniana. (C) Culture character on PDA medium. (D–G) Conidiogenous cells (conidiophores, phialides) and conidia on PDA. Scale A,B: 10 mm; C: 20 mm; D,E: 10 µm; F,G: 5 µm.

MycoBank: MB 844385. Etymology: The haniana was named after the Hani nationality, living in Yunnan. Holotype: China, Yunnan Province, Yuanyang County, Xinjie Town, Duoyishuxia Village. On a pupa of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil, 15 December 2021, Yao Wang (YHH 20175, holotype; YFCC 8769, ex-holotype living culture). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Synnemata arising from every part of the body of the insect host. Synnemata erect, usually irregularly branched at the apex, 20–40 × 1–1.8 mm, pale orange. isaria-like morph producing a mass of conidia at the branch apex, powdery and floccose. Colonies derived from germinating conidia. Colonies on PDA growing well, 24–29 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white, cottony, sporulating abundantly, reverse light orange. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 0.8–2.8 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 3.8–10.2 × 1.1–2.9 µm. Phialides verticillate, usually in whorls of two to five, or solitary on hyphae, 5.4–12.1 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 1.2–2.9 µm wide (base) to 0.3–1.1 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 2.3–3.7 × 1.2–2.8 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum. Host: Pupae of Lepidoptera. Habitat: On the pupae of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil. Distribution: Currently only known in Yuanyang County, Yunnan Province, China; Puer City, Yunnan province, China. Other material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Yuanyang County, Xinjie Town, Duoyishuxia Village. On a pupa of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil, 15 December 2021, Yao Wang (YHH 20176; YFCC 8770, living culture); China, Yunnan province, Puer City, Simao District, Simao Gang Town, Dajiu Village. On a pupa of Lepidoptera in a cocoon buried in soil, 23 August 2021, Zhi-Qin Wang (YHH 20177; YFCC 8771, living culture). Notes: Phylogenetically, S. haniana was identified as a Samsoniella species based on the phylogenetic analyses and was closely related to S. pseudogunii and S. coleopterorum (Figure 1). However, three samples of S. haniana were clustered together with strong statistical support and formed a separate clade. Morphologically, S. haniana differed from S. pseudogunii due to its several synnemata (usually irregularly branched at the apex) and oval conidia. Samsoniella haniana was distinguished from S. coleopterorum with several synnemata (irregularly branched at the apex), longer phialides (5.4–12.1 µm) and larger conidia (2.3–3.7 × 1.2–2.8 µm). H. Yu, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov. (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Morphology of Samsoniella pseudotortricidae. (A,B) Stromata of fungus arising from lepidopteran pupa. (C) Fertile part. (D) Perithecia. (E) Culture character on PDA medium. (F–H) Conidiogenous cells (conidiophores, phialides) and conidia on PDA. Scale A,B: 10 mm; C: 1 mm; D: 300 µm; E: 1 cm; F–H: 10 µm.

MycoBank: MB 844386. Etymology: Referring to macromorphological resemblance of S. tortricidae and S. pseudotortricidae but phylogenetically distinct. Holotype: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Wild Duck Lake Forest Park. On a pupa of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil, 12 August 2017, Hong Yu (YHH 20174, holotype; YFCC 9052, ex-holotype living culture). Sexual morph: Stromata arising from insect cocoon, solitary to several, up to 20–65 mm long, unbranched or dichotomous. Stipes fleshly, flexuous, orange, cylindrical to clavate, 10–43 × 1.1–3.3 mm. Fertile parts reddish orange, clavate to subulate, lateral side usually have a longitudinal section without producing perithecia, 10–17 × 1.5–4.2 mm. Perithecia crowded, superficial, narrowly ovoid to fusiform, 285.7–313.2 × 149.2–154.9 µm. No mature asci or ascospores were observed. Asexual morph: isaria-like. Colonies on PDA grow well, 30–36 mm diameter in 14 days at 25 °C, white, cottony, sporulating abundantly, reverse light orange. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 1.1–1.5 µm wide. Conidiophores smooth-walled, cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 6.6–26.5 × 1.1–2.5 µm. Phialides verticillate, in whorls of two to five, usually solitary on hyphae, 5.4–6.9 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 1.0–1.6 µm wide (base) to 0.5–0.8 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, oblong, fusiform or oval, one-celled, 0.9–1.5 × 0.8–1.3 µm, often in chains. Host: Pupae of Lepidoptera. Habitat: On pupae of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil. Distribution: Currently only known in Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China. Other material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Wild Duck Lake Forest Park. On a pupa of Lepidoptera in cocoons buried in soil, 12 August 2017, Hong Yu (YHH 20189, holotype; YFCC 9053, ex-holotype living culture). Notes:Samsoniella pseudotortricidae was similar to its phylogenetically closely related species S. tortricidae in macromorphology. The stromata were both unbranched or dichotomous, both fertile parts were clavate to subulate, and reddish orange, and the lateral side usually had a longitudinal section without producing perithecia. However, S. pseudotortricidae was easily distinguished by its smaller ascus (285.7–313.2 × 149.2–154.9 µm), smaller phialides (5.4–6.9 × 1.0–1.6 µm) and smaller conidia (0.9–1.5 × 0.8–1.3 µm). It could be easily distinguished phylogenetically from S. tortricidae. H. Yu, Y. Wang & Z.Q. Wang, sp. nov. (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Morphology of Samsoniella sinensis. (A,B) Larva of Lepidoptera infected by S. sinensis. (C) Dermaptera infected by S. sinensis. (D) Culture character on PDA medium. (E–H) Conidiogenous cells (conidiophores, phialides) and conidia on PDA. Scale A,B: 5 mm; C: 3 mm; D: 10 mm; E–H: 10 µm.

MycoBank: MB 844387. Etymology: Named after China (Yunnan and Guizhou provinces), where the species is distributed. Holotype: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Xishan Forest Park. On a larva of Lepidoptera clinging to fallen leaves, 12 August 2018, Hong Yu (YHH 20170, holotype; YFCC 8766, ex-holotype living culture). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Synnemata arising from the host, 3.5–5 mm long, irregularly branched, conidia in abundance at the apex. Colonies fast-growing on PDA, 35–40 mm in 14 days at 25 °C, floccose, crater-shaped, white to pale pink, sporulating abundantly at the centrum, forming a white concentric ring. Reverse pale brown. Hyphae smooth-walled, branched, septate, hyaline, 1.3–3.1 µm wide. Conidiophores cylindrical, solitary or verticillate, 6.4–10.5 × 1.7–2.1 µm. Phialides verticillate, in whorls of two to five, sometimes solitary on hyphae, 5.6–9.3 µm long, basal portion cylindrical to narrowly lageniform, tapering gradually or abruptly toward the apex, from 1.5–2.1 µm wide (base) to 0.6–1.0 µm wide (apex). Conidia smooth and hyaline, spherical, elliptical or fusiform, one-celled, 2.0–3.1 × 1.3–1.9 µm, often in chains. Size and shape of phialides and conidia similar in culture and on natural substratum. Host: Larvae of Lepidoptera, Dermaptera. Habitat: On the larvae of Lepidoptera clinging to fallen leaves or on Dermaptera clinging to fallen leaves. Distribution: Currently only known in Kunming City and Chuxiong City, Yunnan Province, China, and Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China. Other material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Kunming Wild Duck Lake Forest Park. On a pupa of Dermaptera clinging to fallen leaves, 13 August 2017, Yao Wang (YHH 20171; YFCC 8767, living culture); China, Yunnan Province, Chuxiong City, Zixi Mountain. On Dermaptera clinging to fallen leaves, 13 August 2016, Yao Wang (YHH 20172; YFCC 8768, living culture); China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City. On a larva of Lepidoptera, 13 August 2017, Yao Wang (YHH 20173). Notes: Regarding phylogenetic relationships, S. sinensis formed a distinct lineage and was closely related to S. hymenopterorum. Morphologically, synnemata were observed in S. sinensis, and synnemata were not observed in S. hymenopterorum. The phialides of S. sinensis (5.6–9.3 µm) were shorter than those of S. hymenopterorum (6.5–10.6 µm). The conidia of S. hymenopterorum were fusiform to ovoid, 1.9–2.5 × 1.5–2.1 µm, but those of S. sinensis were spherical, elliptical or fusiform, 2.0–3.1 × 1.3–1.9 µm. Samsoniella sinensis was also easily distinguished from S. hymenopterorum by its host. Samsoniella sinensis was found to occur on Lepidoptera and Dermaptera, while S. hymenopterorum was only found to occur on Hymenopterous insects.

4. Discussion

The macromorphology and micromorphology of some Samsoniella species were very similar, and thus, the species were not easy to distinguish using only morphological characteristics [1,2]. In addition, Samsoniella, Beauveria and Cordyceps shared many similar morphological characteristics of sexual morphs, viz., fleshy stromata, red to orange colours, superficial perithecia, cylindrical asci with thickened ascus apex and usually cylindrical and multiseptate ascospores. Samsoniella, Akanthomyces and Cordyceps species produced similar isaria-like asexual conidiogenous structures, such as flask-shaped phialides produced in whorls and conidia with divergent chains [2]. It was more difficult to identify individual Samsoniella species. In the present study, a comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic investigation was conducted in most of the lineages of Samsoniella. The microscopic observations were compared with those for other known species in the genus, revealing some obvious differences, although the morphological features generally overlapped (Table 3 and Table 4). In comparison with other known species, parasitic S. coccinellidicola on adult beetles possessed relatively long phialides, S. farinospora had oblong to cylindrical conidia, S. haniana produced larger conidia, S. pseudotortricidae had smaller conidia and S. sinensis produced a variety of shapes of conidia (viz., spherical, elliptical or fusiform). Based on the five-gene (nrSSU, nrLSU, tef-1α, rpb1 and rpb2) dataset, molecular phylogenetic analyses also supported the existence of the five distinct species in the genus, emphasizing the importance of micromorphology and molecular identification (Figure 1). Samsoniella hepiali has a great medical value due to its therapeutic effects in cardiovascular, respiratory, immunomodulatory, hyposexuality, hyperglycaemia and renal disorder conditions as well as its antitumor properties [2,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China issued File No. 84 on 23 March 2001 and approved S. hepiali mycelia for use as a standalone preparation or a component of health foods (equivalent to dietary supplements in other countries) [40]. Thus, over 260 healthcare products have been developed with S. hepiali as a raw material in the global market, especially the Jinshuibao capsule [2]. To date, S. hepiali has been widely used as an edible and medicinal fungus, generating an impressive economic value of approximately RMB 10 billion a year in China [2]. It seemed to us that the related species of S. hepiali with similar genetic traits should have similar pharmacological activities. In this study, the S. farinospora strain YFCC 9051, isolated from a larva of Hepialus, and the other isolate, such as YFCC 8774, formed an independent clade apart from their allied species of Samsoniella and were further grouped with S. hepiali (see Figure 1). It was suggested that the two species should have a close genetic relationship. Morphologically, the strain YFCC 9051 was very similar to S. hepiali. They shared the same host of the hepialid larva, and both possessed an isaria-like asexual conidiogenous structure, producing synnemata with powdery conidia at the apex. Moreover, the main components in the mycelium of S. farinospora were similar to those in the mycelium of S. hepiali, involving adenosine, alkaloids, amino acids, ergosterol, mannitol, organic acids and polysaccharides (unpublished data). The strains of S. farinospora will be further determined to develop a raw material for healthcare products in future. Previous studies of cordycipitaceous isaria-like fungi showed that species of Samsoniella were globally distributed generalist entomopathogen that were soilborne and had relatively complicated hosts, including Lepidoptera (Hepialidae, Noctuidae, Limacodidae, Saturniidae and Tortricidae), Coleoptera (Curculionidae), Hymenoptera (Formicidae and Vespidae) and two fungi (O. sinensis and C. cicadae) [1,2,41]. Here, an extension of the host range was identified, also including Araneae, Dermaptera and Coccinellidae of Coleoptera, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. Among the hosts of Samsoniella species, Lepidoptera was the major order (Table 2). Because of their broad host range and wide geographical distribution, some species of Samsoniella may have high potential for the interspecific transmission and biological control of pest insects. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of isolates in the field.
  24 in total

1.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Metarhizium frigidum sp. nov.: a cryptic species of M. anisopliae and a member of the M. flavoviride complex.

Authors:  Joseph F Bischoff; Stephen A Rehner; Richard A Humber
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Systematics and evolution of the genus Torrubiella (Hypocreales, Ascomycota).

Authors:  Desiree Johnson; Gi-Ho Sung; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; J Jennifer Luangsa-Ard; Joseph F Bischoff; Ryan M Kepler; Joseph W Spatafora
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2008-10-04

4.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria.

Authors:  Stephen A Rehner; Andrew M Minnis; Gi-Ho Sung; J Jennifer Luangsa-ard; Luis Devotto; Richard A Humber
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing.

Authors:  Diego Darriba; Guillermo L Taboada; Ramón Doallo; David Posada
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Entomopathogens of Amazonian stick insects and locusts are members of the Beauveria species complex (Cordyceps sensu stricto).

Authors:  Tatiana Sanjuan; Javier Tabima; Silvia Restrepo; Thomas Læssøe; Joseph W Spatafora; Ana Esperanza Franco-Molano
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  The polyphyletic nature of Paecilomyces sensu lato based on 18S-generated rDNA phylogeny.

Authors:  J Jennifer Luangsa-Ard; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; Robert A Samson
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Disentangling cryptic species with isaria-like morphs in Cordycipitaceae.

Authors:  Suchada Mongkolsamrit; Wasana Noisripoom; Donnaya Thanakitpipattana; Tuksadon Wutikhun; Joseph W Spatafora; Jennifer Luangsa-Ard
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.