| Literature DB >> 35886404 |
Luyao Xie1, Edmund W J Lee2, Vivian W I Fong1, Kam-Hei Hui1, Meiqi Xin3, Pheonix K H Mo1.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, distorted information about the COVID-19 vaccination is widely disseminated through social media. The present study examined the association between perceived information distortion about COVID-19 vaccination on social media, individuals' functional and critical literacy, and addictive social media use (SMU), as well as the moderating roles of functional and critical literacy in the association between perceived information distortion and addictive SMU among social media users in Hong Kong. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted among 411 Chinese citizens from June to August 2021. Findings showed that after adjusting for significant background variables, including age, gender, marital status, education, occupation, and income, functional literacy was negatively associated with addictive SMU. In addition, significant moderation effects of functional literacy and critical literacy were also observed, such that a positive association between perceived information distortion on social media and addictive SMU was significant among participants with lower functional literacy or higher critical literacy. Findings highlight the importance of improving functional literacy in addictive SMU prevention for social media users. Special attention should also be paid to the potential influence of critical literacy on addictive SMUs.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; addictive social media use; critical literacy; functional literacy; perceived information distortion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35886404 PMCID: PMC9322777 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Background characteristics of the participants (N = 411).
| N/Mean | (%/SD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 34.54 | 15.30 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 169 | 41.1 |
| Female | 242 | 58.9 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 263 | 64 |
| Married | 124 | 30.2 |
| Cohabitating/divorced/widowed | 24 | 5.8 |
| Educational level | ||
| Below university | 87 | 21.2 |
| University or above | 324 | 78.8 |
| Occupational status | ||
| Full time | 181 | 44.1 |
| Student | 137 | 33.3 |
| Retired | 38 | 9.2 |
| Part-time/unemployed/housewife | 55 | 13.4 |
| Monthly income | ||
| Below 10,000 | 186 | 45.3 |
| 10,000–19,999 | 68 | 16.6 |
| 20,000–39,999 | 100 | 24.3 |
| 40,000 above | 54 | 13.1 |
| Refuse to disclose | 3 | 0.7 |
| SMA | 67 | 16.3 |
Correlation between variables (N = 411).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 1. Age | 1.00 | |||||||||
| 2. Gender | 0.01 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| 3. Marital Status | 0.69 ** | 0.04 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 4. Education | −0.51 ** | −0.06 | −0.45 ** | 1.00 | ||||||
| 5. Employment | −0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.10 * | 1.00 | |||||
| 6. Monthly income | 0.48 ** | −0.08 | 0.26 ** | −0.07 | −0.67 ** | 1.00 | ||||
| 7. Perceived information distortion | 0.20 ** | 0.01 | 0.08 | −0.06 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 1.00 | |||
| 8. Functional literacy | −0.14 ** | −0.07 | −0.14 ** | 0.11 * | 0.05 | −0.08 | −0.13 ** | 1.00 | ||
| 9. Critical literacy | −0.11 * | 0.01 | −0.08 | 0.11 * | 0.07 | −0.11 * | 0.01 | 0.08 | 1.00 | |
| 10. Addictive SMU | −0.23 ** | 0.04 | −0.18 ** | 0.11 * | 0.03 | −0.14 ** | 0.02 | −0.26 ** | 0.03 | 1.00 |
** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Hierarchical regression analysis of perceived information distortion and functional literacy on addictive SMU (N = 411).
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |
|
| ||||||
| Age | −0.19 * | (−0.33, −0.04) | −0.23 ** | (−0.37, −0.09) | −0.24 ** | (−0.38, −0.10) |
| Education | ||||||
| Below university | ref | ref | ref | |||
| University or above | 0.00 | (−0.12, 0.11) | 0.00 | (−0.11, 0.11) | 0.00 | [−0.11, 0.11] |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single-divorced-cohabited | ref | ref | ref | |||
| Married | −0.04 | (−0.17, 0.08) | −0.04 | (−0.16, 0.08) | −0.04 | [−0.16, 0.08] |
| Monthly income | ||||||
| 10,000 or above | ref | ref | ref | |||
| below 10,000 | 0.04 | (−0.06, 0.14) | 0.04 | (−0.06, 0.13) | 0.04 | [−0.06, 0.13] |
| Incremental | 5.30 *** | – | – | |||
|
| ||||||
| Perceived information distortion (IV) | – | 0.03 | (−0.06, 0.12) | 0.05 | (−0.04, 0.15) | |
| Functional literacy (M1) | – | −0.29 *** | (−0.38, −0.20) | −0.29 *** | (−0.39, −0.20) | |
| Incremental | – | 8.60 *** | – | |||
|
| ||||||
| IV*M1 | – | – | −0.10 * | (−0.19, 0.00) | ||
| Incremental | – | – | 0.90 *** | |||
| Total | 14.80 *** | |||||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1Interaction between perceived information distortion on social media and functional literacy on addictive SMU (N = 411).
Hierarchical regression analysis of perceived information distortion and critical literacy on addictive SMU (N = 411).
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Age | −0.19 * | (−0.33, −0.04) | −0.21 ** | (−0.35, −0.06) | −0.21 ** | (−0.35, −0.06) |
| Education | ||||||
| Below university | ref | ref | ref | |||
| University or above | 0.00 | (−0.12, 0.11) | −0.01 | (−0.12, 0.11) | −0.01 | (−0.12, 0.11) |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single-divorced-cohabited | ref | ref | ref | |||
| Married | −0.04 | (−0.17, 0.08) | −0.04 | (−0.16, 0.09) | −0.04 | (−0.17, 0.09) |
| Monthly income | ||||||
| 10,000 or above | ref | ref | ref | |||
| Below 10,000 | 0.04 | (−0.06, 0.14) | 0.03 | (−0.07, 0.13) | 0.03 | (−0.07, 0.13) |
| Incremental | 5.30 *** | – | – | |||
|
| ||||||
| Perceived information distortion (IV) | – | 0.06 | (−0.03, 0.16) | 0.06 | (−0.04, 0.16) | |
| Critical literacy (M2) | – | 0.00 | (−0.10, 0.09) | −0.01 | (−0.10, 0.09) | |
| Incremental | – | 0.40 ** | – | |||
|
| ||||||
| IV × M2 | – | – | 0.10* | (0.00, 0.19) | ||
| Incremental | – | – | 0.90 *** | |||
| Total | 6.60 *** | |||||
* p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Interaction between perceived information distortion on social media and critical literacy on addictive SMU (N = 411).