Literature DB >> 22365840

Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions.

Cornelia Betsch1, Noel T Brewer, Pauline Brocard, Patrick Davies, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Niels Haase, Julie Leask, Frank Renkewitz, Britta Renner, Valerie F Reyna, Constanze Rossmann, Katharina Sachse, Alexander Schachinger, Michael Siegrist, Marybelle Stryk.   

Abstract

A growing number of people use the Internet to obtain health information, including information about vaccines. Websites that allow and promote interaction among users are an increasingly popular source of health information. Users of such so-called Web 2.0 applications (e.g. social media), while still in the minority, represent a growing proportion of online communicators, including vocal and active anti-vaccination groups as well as public health communicators. In this paper, the authors: define Web 2.0 and examine how it may influence vaccination decisions; discuss how anti-vaccination movements use Web 2.0 as well as the challenges Web 2.0 holds for public health communicators; describe the types of information used in these different settings; introduce the theoretical background that can be used to design effective vaccination communication in a Web 2.0 environment; make recommendations for practice and pose open questions for future research. The authors conclude that, as a result of the Internet and Web 2.0, private and public concerns surrounding vaccinations have the potential to virally spread across the globe in a quick, efficient and vivid manner. Web 2.0 may influence vaccination decisions by delivering information that alters the perceived personal risk of vaccine-preventable diseases or vaccination side-effects. It appears useful for public health officials to put effort into increasing the effectiveness of existing communication by implementing interactive, customized communication. A key step to providing successful public health communication is to identify those who are particularly vulnerable to finding and using unreliable and misleading information. Thus, it appears worthwhile that public health websites strive to be easy to find, easy to use, attractive in its presentation and readily provide the information, support and advice that the searcher is looking for. This holds especially when less knowledgeable individuals are in need of reliable information about vaccination risks and benefits.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365840     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  98 in total

1.  Beyond the verbal: Pregnant women's preferences for receiving influenza and Tdap vaccine information from their obstetric care providers.

Authors:  Mallory Ellingson; Allison T Chamberlain
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Negotiating vaccine acceptance in an era of reluctance.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Dangerous agent or saviour? HPV vaccine representations on online discussion forums in Romania.

Authors:  Marcela A Penţa; Adriana Băban
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

4.  Understanding Vaccine Refusal: Why We Need Social Media Now.

Authors:  Mark Dredze; David A Broniatowski; Michael C Smith; Karen M Hilyard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Social media targeting of health messages. A promising approach for research and practice.

Authors:  Cornelia Betsch
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Understanding the use of digital technology to promote human papillomavirus vaccination - A RE-AIM framework approach.

Authors:  Ashley B Stephens; Chelsea S Wynn; Melissa S Stockwell
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Could Social Bots Pose a Threat to Public Health?

Authors:  Jon-Patrick Allem; Emilio Ferrara
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Vaccine hesitancy: an overview.

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Caroline Laberge; Maryse Guay; Paul Bramadat; Réal Roy; Julie Bettinger
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Chinese social media suggest decreased vaccine acceptance in China: An observational study on Weibo following the 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident.

Authors:  Dian Hu; Christine Martin; Mark Dredze; David A Broniatowski
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.